首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swe
(1) Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swe
admin
2017-02-25
24
问题
(1) Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swept aside by the mechanical loom. Over the past 30 years the digital revolution has displaced many of the mid-skill jobs that underpinned 20th-century middle-class life. Typists, ticket agents, bank tellers and many production-line jobs have been dispensed with, just as the weavers were.
(2) For those who believe that technological progress has made the world a better place, such churn is a natural part of rising prosperity. Although innovation kills some jobs, it creates new and better ones, as a more productive society becomes richer and its wealthier inhabitants demand more goods and services. Optimism remains the right starting-point, but for workers the dislocating effects of technology may make themselves evident faster than its benefits. Even if new jobs and wonderful products emerge, in the short term income gaps will widen, causing huge social dislocation and perhaps even changing politics.
(3) Why be worried? It is partly just a matter of history repeating itself. In the early part of the Industrial Revolution the rewards of increasing productivity went disproportionately to capital; later on, labor reaped most of the benefits. The pattern today is similar. The prosperity unleashed by the digital revolution has gone overwhelmingly to the owners of capital and the highest-skilled workers. Over the past three decades, labor’s share of output has shrunk globally from 64% to 59%. Meanwhile, the share of income going to the top 1% in America has risen from around 9% in the 1970s to 22% today. Unemployment is at alarming levels in much of the rich world, and not just for cyclical reasons. Fifteen years ago, 65% of working-age Americans were in work; since then the proportion has fallen, during good years as well as bad, to the current level of 59%.
(4) Worse, it seems likely that this wave of technological disruption to the job market has only just started. From driverless cars to clever household gadgets, innovations that already exist could destroy swathes of jobs that have hitherto been untouched. The public sector is one obvious target: it has proved singularly resistant to tech-driven reinvention. But the step change in what computers can do will have a powerful effect on middle-class jobs in the private sector too.
(5) Until now the jobs most vulnerable to machines were those that involved routine, repetitive tasks. But thanks to the exponential rise in processing power and the ubiquity of digitised information ("big data"), computers are increasingly able to perform complicated tasks more cheaply and effectively than people. Clever industrial robots can quickly "learn" a set of human actions. Services may be even more vulnerable. Computers can already detect intruders in a closed-circuit camera picture more reliably than a human can. By comparing reams of financial or biometric data, they can often diagnose fraud or illness more accurately than any number of accountants or doctors.
(6) At the same time, the digital revolution is transforming the process of innovation itself. Thanks to off-the-shelf code from the internet and platforms that host services (such as Amazon’s cloud computing), provide distribution (Apple’s app store) and offer marketing (Facebook), the number of digital startups has exploded. Just as computer-games designers invented a product that humanity never knew it needed but now cannot do without, so these firms will no doubt dream up new goods and services to employ millions. But for now they are singularly light on workers. When Instagram, a popular photo-sharing site, was sold to Facebook for about $1 billion in 2012, it had 30 million customers and employed 13 people. Kodak, which filed for bankruptcy a few months earlier, employed 145,000 people in its heyday.
(7) The problem is one of timing as much as anything. Google now employs 46,000 people. But it takes years for new industries to grow, whereas the disruption a startup causes to incumbents is felt sooner. Airbnb may turn homeowners with spare rooms into entrepreneurs, but it poses a direct threat to the lower end of the hotel business—a massive employer.
(8) If this analysis is halfway correct, the social effects will be huge. Many of the jobs most at risk are lower down the ladder (logistics, haulage), whereas the skills that are least vulnerable to automation (creativity, managerial expertise) tend to be higher up, so median wages are likely to remain stagnant for some time and income gaps are likely to widen.
(9) Anger about rising inequality is bound to grow, but politicians will find it hard to address the problem. Shunning progress would be as futile now as the Luddites’ protests against mechanised looms were in the 1810s, because any country that tried to stop would be left behind by competitors eager to embrace new technology. The freedom to raise taxes on the rich to punitive levels will be similarly constrained by the mobility of capital and highly skilled labour.
(10) The main way in which governments can help their people through this dislocation is through education systems. One of the reasons for the improvement in workers’ fortunes in the latter part of the Industrial Revolution was because schools were built to educate them—a dramatic change at the time. Now those schools themselves need to be changed, to foster the creativity that humans will need to set them apart from computers. There should be less rote-learning and more critical thinking. Technology itself will help, whether through MOOCs (massive open online courses) or even video games that simulate the skills needed for work.
(11) Yet however well people are taught, their abilities will remain unequal, and in a world which is increasingly polarised economically, many will find their job prospects dimmed and wages squeezed. The best way of helping them is not, as many on the left seem to think, to push up minimum wages. Jacking up the floor too far would accelerate the shift from human workers to computers. Better to top up low wages with public money so that anyone who works has a reasonable income, through a bold expansion of the tax credits that countries such as America and Britain use.
(12) Innovation has brought great benefits to humanity. Nobody in their right mind would want to return to the world of handloom weavers. But the benefits of technological progress are unevenly distributed, especially in the early stages of each new wave, and it is up to governments to spread them. In the 19th century it took the threat of revolution to bring about progressive reforms. Today’s governments would do well to start making the changes needed before their people get angry.
It can be concluded that the author is towards _____ technological progress.
选项
A、indifferent
B、neutral
C、positive
D、negative
答案
B
解析
最后一段首先肯定了科技进步带来的创新的长处,强调没有人会愿意回到过去,接着又提到科技浪潮的初期会引起分配不均,这又是其弊端,所以作者看到其利弊双方,是中立的,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/OY7O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Itcanbetemptingtohidefromthepeople,placesandtaskswhichmakelifestressful.Byremovingyoufromthesituation,it’s
Itcanbetemptingtohidefromthepeople,placesandtaskswhichmakelifestressful.Byremovingyoufromthesituation,it’s
Itcanbetemptingtohidefromthepeople,placesandtaskswhichmakelifestressful.Byremovingyoufromthesituation,it’s
Itcanbetemptingtohidefromthepeople,placesandtaskswhichmakelifestressful.Byremovingyoufromthesituation,it’s
Everyculturehasacceptedstandardswhenitcomestopersonalhygiene.ForeignvisitorsshouldthereforebeawareofwhatAmer
WaltWhitmanwasapioneeringfigureofAmericanpoetry.Hisinnovation,firstofall,liesinhisuseof______poetrywithouta
HowtoApproachDiscursiveWriting?Howtoimprovetheeffectivenessofstudents’writing?Therearesixstageswhichshould
AtHarvardCollegeinSeptember,acontroversyeruptedovertheadoptionofa"freshmanpledge,"whichforthefirsttimeasked
AtHarvardCollegeinSeptember,acontroversyeruptedovertheadoptionofa"freshmanpledge,"whichforthefirsttimeasked
AtHarvardCollegeinSeptember,acontroversyeruptedovertheadoptionofa"freshmanpledge,"whichforthefirsttimeasked
随机试题
简述专门的学前科学教育活动的类型。
人们看书时,用红笔圈出重点,便于重新阅读,是利用了知觉的【】
t.i.d.的含义是
下列选项中,不属于政府采购特点的是()。
根据《机电产品国际招标投标实施办法》的规定,采用最低评标价法评标的,投标文件如有缺漏项,评标时须将()计入其评标总价。
根据《水利工程建设重大质量与安全事故应急预案》,按事故的严重程度和影响范围,将水利工程建设质量与安全事故分为()级。
有关估算指标的作用说法不正确的是()。
1.2014年1月14日,中共中央总书记、国家主席、中央军委主席习近平在中国共产党第十八届中央纪律检查委员会第三次全体会议上发表重要讲话。他强调,坚持党要管党、从严治党,强化党对党风廉政建设和反腐败工作统一领导,强化反腐败体制机制创新和制度保障,加强思想政
有人认为,每年都有大量的移民涌入英国,占用了大量的公共资源,并抢走了本地人的就业机会,所以这些人支持英国“脱欧”。以下哪项如果为真,最能质疑上述观点?
一桩投毒谋杀案,作案者要么是甲,要么是乙,二者必有其一,所用毒药或者是毒鼠强或者是乐果,二者至少其一。如果上述断定为真。则以下哪项推断一定成立?I.该投毒案不是甲投毒鼠强所为,因此一定是乙投乐果所为。Ⅱ.在该案侦破中发现甲投了
最新回复
(
0
)