首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
One school night this month I sidled up to Alexander, my 15-year-old son, and stroked his cheek in a manner I hoped would seem c
One school night this month I sidled up to Alexander, my 15-year-old son, and stroked his cheek in a manner I hoped would seem c
admin
2015-07-27
7
问题
One school night this month I sidled up to Alexander, my 15-year-old son, and stroked his cheek in a manner I hoped would seem casual. Alex knew better, sensing by my touch, which lingered just a moment too long, that I was sneaking a touch of the stubble that had begun to sprout near his ears. A year ago he would have ignored this intrusion and returned my gesture with a squeeze. But now he recoiled, retreating stormily to his computer screen. That, and a peevish roll of his eyes, told me more forcefully than words, Mom, you are so busted!
I had committed the ultimate folly: invading my teenager’s personal space. "The average teenager has pretty strong feelings about his privacy," Lara Fox, a recent young acquaintance, told me with an assurance that brooked no debate. Her friend Hilary Frankel chimed in: "What Alex is saying is: ’This is my body changing. It’s not yours.’" Intruding, however discreetly, risked making him feel babied "at a time when feeling like an adult is very important to him", she added.
O.K., score one for the two of you. These young women, after all, are experts. Ms. Frankel and Ms. Fox, both 17, are the authors of Breaking the Code (New American Library), a new book that seeks to bridge the generational divide between parents and adolescents. It is being promoted by its publisher as the first self-help guide by teenagers for their parents, a kind of Kids Are From Mars, Parents Are From Venus that demystifies the language and actions of teenagers. The girls tackled issues including curfews, money, school pressures, smoking and sibling rivalry.
Personally, I welcomed insights into teenagers from any qualified experts, and that included the authors. The most common missteps in interacting with teenagers, they instructed me, stem from the turf war between parents asserting their right to know what goes on under their roof and teenagers zealously guarding their privacy. When a child is younger, they write, every decision revolves around the parents. But now, as Ms. Fox told me, "often your teenager is in this bubble that doesn’t include you".
Ms. Fox and Ms. Frankel acknowledge that they and their peers can be quick to interpret their parents’ remarks as dismissive or condescending and respond with a hostility that masks their vulnerability. "What we want above all is your approval," they write. "Don’t forget, no matter how much we act as if we don’t care what you say, we believe the things you say about us."
Nancy Samalin, a New York child-rearing expert and the author of Loving Without Spoiling (McGraw-Hill, 2003), said she didn’t agree with everything the authors suggested but found their arguments reasonable. "When your kids are saying, ’You don’t get it, and you never will’, there are lots of ways to respond so that they will listen," she said, "and that’s what the writers point out."
As for my teenager, Alex, Ms. Fox and Ms. Frankel told me I would have done better to back off or to have asked "Is your skin feeling rougher these days?"
A more successful approach, the authors suggest in their book, would have been for the mother to offer, as Ms. Fox’s own parents did, a later curfew once a month, along with an explanation of her concerns. "My parents helped me see," Ms. Fox told me, "that even though they used to stay out late and ride their bicycles to school, times have changed. These days there is a major fear factor in bringing up kids. Parents worry about their child crossing the street."
The writers said they hoped simply to shed light on teenage thinking. For their parents it did. Reminded by Ms. Fox that teenagers can be quite territorial. Her father, Steven Fox, a dentist, said, "These days I’m better about knocking on the door when I want to come into Lara’s room." "I try to talk to her in a more respectful way, more as an adultish type of teenager rather than a childish type of teenager," he added.
The book Kids Are From Mars, Parents Are From Venus is mentioned in the third paragraph because
选项
A、it has the opposite opinion to the book written by the two girls.
B、it has ranked first on the list of best sellers for several times.
C、it has the same theme with the book written by the two girls.
D、it is another book that the two girls have ever written.
答案
C
解析
推理判断题。第三段主要在介绍一本叫Breaking the Code的书,该段倒数第二句讲到这本书有点像Kids Are From Mars,Parents Are From Venus——解释了青少年的语言和行为,可见两本书的相似之处在于其共同的主题,故答案为[C]。[A]项表述和文章内容相反,可排除。[B]、[D]两项文章没有提到,皆可排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/OcOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
InAmerica,thethreebiggestnewspapersareofthefollowingEXCEPT
Historianshaveonlyrecentlybeguntonotetheincreaseindemandforluxurygoodsandservicestookplaceineighteenth-centur
ThefamousOldFaithfulislocatedin
A、BecauseIndiaandChinafoughtthere.B、Becauseitbecomesdependentontheimport.C、BecausetheIndiangovernmentregardedt
FastfoodispopularinChina.TheworldwidefamousforeigncompanieslikeKFCandMcDonaldareSpreadingtoalmosteverycityi
Themeaningsof"science"and"technology"havechangedsignificantlyfromonegenerationtoanother.Moresimilaritiesthandif
它们保护自己的幼儿是一刻也不肯懈怠的。两只眼睛好像燃着的两团烈火。脖子时常要竖着向四方倾听。全身的神经好像紧张得要断裂一样。这样加紧的防御,有时还要变为攻击。即使你不怀敌意地走近它们,它们也要发出一种怪怪的叫声,飞来啄你。摄取食物的时候,它们自己也决不肯先
WhichofthefollowingworksisNOTwrittenbyWilliamShakespeare?
Accordingtotheinterview,anerdcampisasummercampforchildrenwith______.
在考生时代,我喜欢写自己最爱写的东西;后来到了我当教师的时候,就深深地记着“己所不欲,勿施于人”的格言,我绝不伤害他们的脑筋;有时一次出二三十个题目,由他们自由去选择,或者干脆由他们自己作主,爱写什么就写什么。他们写的情书,偶然也给我修改;说真话,那比他们
随机试题
设若向量组α1,α2,α3与α1,α2,α4等价,则λ的取值范围是().
先天性脑积水的分型及临床表现。
垄断资本主义的基本特征有()。
营养教育是健康教育的组成部分,通过营养教育可以()。[江苏2011年三级真题]
彼得.盖伊在《启蒙运动》中写道:“在文艺复兴时期的文人中间,完全世俗的、完全清醒的世界观,相对来说是很少见的……神圣的东西仍是文艺复兴时期雕塑家、建筑师和画家的中心主题。”这表明文艺复兴()。
以下属于杜威实用主义教育观念的是()
规则是由概念组成的,它反映了概念之间的关系;规则学习以掌握相应的概念为基础,其实质是学生能在体现规则变化的情境中适当应用规则。这种规则就是加涅学习结果分类中的()
教学评价是指依据一定的客观标准,对教学活动及其结果进行()的过程。
(2017年第10题)第一次世界大战,德国战败,1918年12月,陈独秀在《每周评论》的发刊词中说,大战结果是“公理战胜强权”并把美国总统威尔逊称作是“现在世界上第一个好人”。然而,陈独秀在1919年5月4日出版的《每周评论》上的一篇文章中又写道:“什么公
PASSAGETHREEWhatresultedfromaseriesofspeculativeboomsaccordingtoSandage?
最新回复
(
0
)