首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
• Read the following article about career development and the questions on the opposite page. • For each question 15-20,mark
• Read the following article about career development and the questions on the opposite page. • For each question 15-20,mark
admin
2010-01-28
66
问题
• Read the following article about career development and the questions on the opposite page.
• For each question 15-20,mark one letter(A,B,C or D)on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
How to get to the top
Marketing used to be the route to the chief executive’s chair,but the world has changed.Now,says Monika Hamori.professor of human resources at Instituto de Empresa in Madrid,it is finance chiefs who are most likely to get the top job,though experience in opera-tions-running parts of the companyis also essential.CFO Magazine found in 2005 that onefifth of chief ex-ecutives in America were former chief financiaI officers,almost double the share of a decade earlier.The importance of quarterly financial reporting,and closer scrutiny since the imposition of the Sarbanesoxley corporategovernance act,have put CFOs in the limelightand given them the chance to shine.
Another factor in reaching the top is whether you stay with the company you joined as a youngster.Ms.Hamori’s research looked at companies in the S&P 500 and the FTSEurofirst 300.She finds that‘lifers’get to the top in 22 years in America and 24 years in Europe:‘Hoppers’who jump between four or more companies,by contrast,take at least 26 years on average to become chief executives.Insiders get promotions that reflect their potential,because their bosses have enough information to be reasonably confident about their ability.When executives switch from one company to another,however,they tend to move less far up the hierarchy,the researchers found.
The time taken to reach the top is falling.The average time from first job to chief executive fell from 28 years in 1980 to 24 in 2001.Successful executives are spending less time than they used to in each intermediate joban average of four yearsand they fill five posts on the way up.down from six.One reason for this acceleration is that company hierarchies are flatter than they used to be.Another important shift is the advent of female chief executives. 1n 2001 women accounted for 11%of bosses at leading American companies.ac-cording to the Hamori/Cappelli survey;in the early 1980s there were none.
America is usually regarded as the home of raw capitalism.with youthful managers hopping from firm to firm and pushing their way to the top.But the HamorL/Cappelli study and another by Booz & Company,a consultancy,show that Europe is a more dynamic and harsher environ-menl than America or Japan for chief executives.For a start,European chief executives are younger,with an average age of 54.compared with over 56 in America.The Hamor/Cappelli study shows that 26%of American bos-ses were lifers,compared with only 18%in Europe.
The Europeans also have a harder time once they get to the top.Booz & Company’s annual survey of chiefexecutive succession shows that 17.6%of European bosses moved on last year.compared with 15%of Americans and 10%of Japanese.Chief executives.the survey found,last longer in America:the average tenure over the past decade was just over nine years.But in Europe the average tenure over the same period was less than seven years.
Moreover.a whopping 37%of changes at the top in Europe were more or less firings,according to Booz,compared with only 27%in America and 12%in Japan.Booz puts this down to the more recent tightening of corporate governance in Europe,Another Booz finding is common to both sides of the Atlantic:looking back over recent years,board disputes and power struggles lie behind a third of chiefexecutive firings.In short,shareholder activism is making its presence felt,putting pressure on bosses to perform.
According to the last paragraph,
选项
A、employees are more likely to be fired as they get higher in position.
B、executives in Japan are more likely to get fired than those in America.
C、corporate governance in America and Japan is too loose.
D、shareholders in both America and Europe put great pressure on the management.
答案
D
解析
本题用筛选法可以很快确定答案D。 只要正确理解本段的第一句话就可以排除A和B。第一句话的意思是“根据Booz的调查,在欧洲,高达37%的高层人事变动都多少带有被解雇的性质,而美国和日本则分别为27%和12%”。A项的意思是“职位越高的职员更容易被解雇”,与本句不符。此外,参考句中“美国和日本(的高层解雇比例)分别为27%和12%”可以判断B为错误。至于选项C,它的意思是“美国和日本的企业管理太过松散”,这并没有在本段提及,而且也不能从段中的第二句“:Booz puts this down to the m
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/OkKd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whoisthetrainingprogramintendedfor?
A、 B、 C、 B~,wasn’tit?对于这种否定型的提问,多数情况下回答都是肯定的。(A)要留意training和train发音的相似。(B)比预想的要好,回答得非常自然。(C)不要只听了Idon’tknow
Whatdidthewomanlearnaboutduringthetraining?
(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.MarketResearch:theimportanceofdoingmarketresearc
Iscapitalmarketimportantornot?Why?Canyougiveexplanationaboutit?
Askingquestions征询
CouldyoutellmewhatinfluenceyouthinkinternationalbusinessishavingonworkpracticesinChina?Why?
•Readthetextbelowaboutthelogistics.•Inmostofthelines41-52thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyinco
•Readthetextbelowabouttelevisionnetwork.•Inmostofthelines41—52thereistoneextraword.Itiseithergrammatically
•Readthetextbelowabouttelevisionnetwork.•Inmostofthelines41—52thereistoneextraword.Itiseithergrammatically
随机试题
若施工中施工图纸或设计变更与工程量清单项目特征表述不一致,发承包双方应(),依据合同约定重新确定综合单价。
美育作为一门独立的学科的出现是以哪一部著作的诞生为标志的()
射野输出因子(OUT)是描述射野输出剂量随射野增大而增加的关系,它定义为
初产妇,23岁。妊娠40周,临产8小时后出现烦躁不安,呼吸加快,下腹疼痛,拒按,胎心听不清,查体见下腹部近肚下方一环状凹陷,导尿为血尿,该患者最可能的诊断是
混悬液型气雾剂属于乳浊液型气雾剂属于
A.软膏剂B.贴剂C.凝胶膏剂D.膏药E.橡胶膏剂由背衬层、药物贮库层、黏胶层和防黏层组成的薄片状贴膏剂是()。
《2000年国际贸易术语解释通则》中,C组贸易术语与其他组的贸易术语的区别是( )。
关于个人教育贷款,以下理解有误的是()。
你发现一个同事在工作中遇到了困难,而你又具有解决这个困难的能力。在这种情况下,你通常采取的做法是()。
IfoursolarsystemhasaHell,it’sVenus.Theairischokedwithfoulandcorrosivesulfur,heavedfromancientvolcanoesand
最新回复
(
0
)