首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
"The world isn’t flat," writes Edward Glaeser, "it’s paved. " At any rate, most of the places where people prefer to dwell are p
"The world isn’t flat," writes Edward Glaeser, "it’s paved. " At any rate, most of the places where people prefer to dwell are p
admin
2012-03-23
55
问题
"The world isn’t flat," writes Edward Glaeser, "it’s paved. " At any rate, most of the places where people prefer to dwell are paved. More than half of humanity now lives in cities, and every month 5 million people move from the countryside to a city somewhere in the developing world.
For Mr Glaeser, a Harvard economist who grew up in Manhattan, this is a happy prospect. He calls cities "our species’ greatest invention": proximity makes people more inventive, as bright minds feed off one another; more productive, as scale gives rise to finer degrees of specialisation; and kinder to the planet, as city-dwellers are more likely to go by foot, bus or train than the car-slaves of suburbia and the sticks. He builds a strong case, too, for town-dwelling, drawing on his own research as well as that of other observers of urban life. And although liberally sprinkled with statistics, Triumph of the City is no dry work. Mr Glaeser writes lucidly and spares his readers the equations of his trade.
What makes some cities succeed? Successful places have in common the ability to attract people and to enable them to collaborate. Yet Mr Glaeser also says they are not like Tolstoy’s happy families: those that thrive, thrive in their own ways. Titus Tokyo is a national seat of political and financial power. Singapore embodies a peculiar mix of the free market, state-led industrialisation and paternalism. The well-educated citizenries of Boston, Milan, Minneapolis and New York have found new sources of prosperity when old ones ran out.
Mr Glaeser is likely to raise hackles in three areas. The first is urban poverty in the developing world. He can see the misery of a slum in Kolkata, Lagos or Rio de Janeiro as easily as anyone else, but believes that "there’s a lot to like about urban poverty" because it beats the rural kind. Cities attract the poor with the promise of a better lot than the countryside offers. About three-quarters of Lagos’s people have access to safe drinking water; the Nigerian average is less than 30%. Rural West Bengal’s poverty rate is twice Kolkata’s.
The second is the height of buildings. Mr Glaeser likes them tall—and it’s not just the Manhattanite in him speaking. He likes low-rise neighbourhoods, too, but points out that restrictions on height are also restrictions on the supply of space, which push up the prices of housing and offices. That suits those who own property already, but hurts those who might otherwise move in, and hence perhaps the city as a whole.
So Mr Glaeser wonders whether central Paris might have benefited from a few skyscrapers. He certainly believes that his hometown should preserve fewer old buildings. And he thinks that cities in developing countries should build up rather than out. New downtown developments in Mumbai, he says, should rise to at least 40 storeys.
The third, related, area is sprawl, which is promoted, especially in America, by flawed policies nationally and locally. Living out of town may feel green, but it isn’t. Americans live too far apart, drive too much and walk too little. The tax-deductibility of mortgage interest encourages people to buy houses rather than rent flats, buy bigger properties rather than smaller ones and therefore to spread out. Minimum plot sizes keep folk out of, say, Marin County, California. He says that spreading Houston has "done a better job of providing affordable housing than all of the progressive reformers on America’s East and West coasts. "
Cities need wise government above all else, and they get it too rarely. That is one reason why, from Paris in 1789 to Cairo in 2011, they are sources of political upheaval as well as economic advance. The reader may wonder if Mumbai really would be better off as a city of high-rise slums rather than low-rise ones.
The sentence in the first paragraph "The world isn’t flat. . , it’s paved. " implies that
选项
A、the world is a round settled planet.
B、citys are built by human beings.
C、urban life is better than suburban life.
D、people prefer to dwell in the countryside.
答案
B
解析
根据第1段第2、3句可知,大部分人类喜爱居住的地方都是被人类铺平的。故选项B正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/OsiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Lazinessisasin.Everyoneknowsthatwehaveprobablyallhadlecturespointingoutthatlazinessisimmoral,thatitiswaste
Jealousy’sPurposeGoodmorning,everyone.Today’slecturewillfocusonacommonpsychologicalproblem—jealousy.Evolutionar
Inschoolsofvariouslevelsandkinds,groupingofgiftedstudentsisaprettycommonphenomenon.Differentpeople,however,st
Sometimesoon,accordingtoanimal-rightactivities,agreatapewilltestifyinanAmericancourtroom.Speakingthroughavoice
WhichofthefollowingisNOTwrittenbyWilliamButlerYeats?
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTtrue?
______isregardedasthemostsuccessfulreligiousallegoryintheEnglishlanguage.
A语言学概念的实例分析。该题属于句法学的范畴。单词在句中的位置不可随意调换,这是由句法学结构主义学派提出的.Syntagmaticrelation(组合关系)规定的。
A、Adriver.B、Apassenger.C、Apoliceman.D、doctor.C
A、InBritain.B、InAustralia.C、InItaly.D、Noneoftheabove.C
随机试题
10~17岁青少年IDA发病率为
尖锐湿疣的病原是
小儿厌食脾运失健证的用方是小儿厌食胃阴不足证的用方是
A.亲和力及内在活性都强B.具有一定亲和力但内在活性弱C.与亲和力和内在活性无关D.有亲和力、无内在活性,与受体不可逆性结合E.有亲和力、无内在活性,与激动剂竞争相同受体效价高、效能强的激动剂
管道工程施工应遵循()、水管让风管的配管原则。
甲公司有关业务如下:(1)2010年10月20日,甲公司自公开市场取得—项权益性投资,支付价款2000万元,作为交易性金融资产核算。2010年12月31日,该投资的市价为2200万元,2010年税前会计利润为1000万元。(2)2011年12月31日,
2014年,12358全国价格举报管理系统将实现()联网,进一步提升价格监管的信息化水平。
下列关于《矛盾论》表述正确的是()。
某超市以每千克7元的价格购入水果200千克,并以每千克10元的价格售出150千克,剩下可出售的水果按八折甩卖一空。经计算,销售本批水果共获利300元。那么,这批水果的折损率是多少?
以下叙述中,错误的是( )。
最新回复
(
0
)