首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
"The world isn’t flat," writes Edward Glaeser, "it’s paved. " At any rate, most of the places where people prefer to dwell are p
"The world isn’t flat," writes Edward Glaeser, "it’s paved. " At any rate, most of the places where people prefer to dwell are p
admin
2012-03-23
51
问题
"The world isn’t flat," writes Edward Glaeser, "it’s paved. " At any rate, most of the places where people prefer to dwell are paved. More than half of humanity now lives in cities, and every month 5 million people move from the countryside to a city somewhere in the developing world.
For Mr Glaeser, a Harvard economist who grew up in Manhattan, this is a happy prospect. He calls cities "our species’ greatest invention": proximity makes people more inventive, as bright minds feed off one another; more productive, as scale gives rise to finer degrees of specialisation; and kinder to the planet, as city-dwellers are more likely to go by foot, bus or train than the car-slaves of suburbia and the sticks. He builds a strong case, too, for town-dwelling, drawing on his own research as well as that of other observers of urban life. And although liberally sprinkled with statistics, Triumph of the City is no dry work. Mr Glaeser writes lucidly and spares his readers the equations of his trade.
What makes some cities succeed? Successful places have in common the ability to attract people and to enable them to collaborate. Yet Mr Glaeser also says they are not like Tolstoy’s happy families: those that thrive, thrive in their own ways. Titus Tokyo is a national seat of political and financial power. Singapore embodies a peculiar mix of the free market, state-led industrialisation and paternalism. The well-educated citizenries of Boston, Milan, Minneapolis and New York have found new sources of prosperity when old ones ran out.
Mr Glaeser is likely to raise hackles in three areas. The first is urban poverty in the developing world. He can see the misery of a slum in Kolkata, Lagos or Rio de Janeiro as easily as anyone else, but believes that "there’s a lot to like about urban poverty" because it beats the rural kind. Cities attract the poor with the promise of a better lot than the countryside offers. About three-quarters of Lagos’s people have access to safe drinking water; the Nigerian average is less than 30%. Rural West Bengal’s poverty rate is twice Kolkata’s.
The second is the height of buildings. Mr Glaeser likes them tall—and it’s not just the Manhattanite in him speaking. He likes low-rise neighbourhoods, too, but points out that restrictions on height are also restrictions on the supply of space, which push up the prices of housing and offices. That suits those who own property already, but hurts those who might otherwise move in, and hence perhaps the city as a whole.
So Mr Glaeser wonders whether central Paris might have benefited from a few skyscrapers. He certainly believes that his hometown should preserve fewer old buildings. And he thinks that cities in developing countries should build up rather than out. New downtown developments in Mumbai, he says, should rise to at least 40 storeys.
The third, related, area is sprawl, which is promoted, especially in America, by flawed policies nationally and locally. Living out of town may feel green, but it isn’t. Americans live too far apart, drive too much and walk too little. The tax-deductibility of mortgage interest encourages people to buy houses rather than rent flats, buy bigger properties rather than smaller ones and therefore to spread out. Minimum plot sizes keep folk out of, say, Marin County, California. He says that spreading Houston has "done a better job of providing affordable housing than all of the progressive reformers on America’s East and West coasts. "
Cities need wise government above all else, and they get it too rarely. That is one reason why, from Paris in 1789 to Cairo in 2011, they are sources of political upheaval as well as economic advance. The reader may wonder if Mumbai really would be better off as a city of high-rise slums rather than low-rise ones.
The sentence in the first paragraph "The world isn’t flat. . , it’s paved. " implies that
选项
A、the world is a round settled planet.
B、citys are built by human beings.
C、urban life is better than suburban life.
D、people prefer to dwell in the countryside.
答案
B
解析
根据第1段第2、3句可知,大部分人类喜爱居住的地方都是被人类铺平的。故选项B正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/OsiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Jealousy’sPurposeGoodmorning,everyone.Today’slecturewillfocusonacommonpsychologicalproblem—jealousy.Evolutionar
Thedeclineinmoralstandards--whichhaslongconcernedsocialanalysts---hasatlastcapturedtheattentionofaverageAmerica
Weuselanguageeveryday.Weliveinaworldofwords.Hardlyanymomentpasseswithsomeonetalking,writingorreading.Indee
Inaperfectlyfreeandopenmarketeconomy,thetypeofemployer—governmentorprivate-shouldhavelittleornoimpactonthee
Speech-acttheory*vasfirstdevelopedby______.
Nooneknowswhenthefirstcalendarwasdeveloped.Butitseemspossiblethatitwasbasedonlunarmonths.Whenpeoplestarted
Scienceisacumulativebodyofknowledgeaboutthenaturalworld,obtainedbytheapplicationofaparticularmethodpractised
我一直以为大学校长是高瞻远瞩、指导学术与教育大方向的决策人,而不是管馒头稀饭的保姆,但这也暂且不提。这一类型的教育者的用心,毋庸置疑,当然是善意的。问题是,我们论“事”的时候,用心如何根本不重要,重要的是实际的后果,而教育的后果何其严重!在这种过度呵护的幼
Canada’sEducationSystemTheCanadiangovernmentprovides【1】publiceducationforallstudentsfromKindergartentoGrade12.
Lastyear’seconomyshouldhavewontheOscarforbestpicture.Growthingrossdomesticproductwas4.1percent;profitssoared
随机试题
设f(x)在[0,1]上连续,在(0,1)上可导,且f(0)=f(1)=0,若f(x)在[0,1]上的最大值为M>0。设n>1,证明:存在c∈(0,1),使得f(c)=;
"Igetbywithalittlehelpfrommyfriends"isapopularlyric(抒情诗)withage-oldwisdombehindit.【B1】______peopleneedpeop
中华田园犬,雄性,2岁,昨晚外出未归,今晨发现患犬精神沉郁。呼吸急促,体温39℃。左胸侧壁中下部有创口,被血块、泥土及被毛所污染,创围略肿胀,按压有捻发音,胸侧位X线检查,肺野透明度增加,心脏前缘心尖部轮廓上抬。患犬胸壁创属于()
下列哪项对鉴别燥邪犯肺证和肺阴虚证最有意义
现代破产法上的破产一般包括哪几种程序?()。
甲对拆迁不满,在高速公路中间车道用树枝点燃一个焰高约20厘米的火堆,将其分成两堆后离开。火堆很快就被通行车辆轧灭。关于本案,下列哪一选项是正确的?(2016年卷二12题)
某项目招标文件的评标办法中,将投标人的项目负责人资格、业绩设定为重要评标因素,且投标报价的评价权重占了60%。该招标项目最有可能是()。
下列属于实质性加工标准的有( )。
解决科技与经济结合的问题始终是科技体制改革的核心,以往的改革从技术商品化、科技运行机制、组织结构、人事制度等方面采取了一系列措施,主要着力在微观组织层面。改革进程发展到今天,需要更多地从宏观管理层面思考问题。换句话说,改革已经改到了推动科技体制改革的政府管
中国古代哲学家张载提出“凡可状皆有也;凡有皆象也;凡象皆气也。”这是
最新回复
(
0
)