首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can Burglars Jam Your Wireless Security System? A)Any product that promises to protect your home deserves careful examination. S
Can Burglars Jam Your Wireless Security System? A)Any product that promises to protect your home deserves careful examination. S
admin
2019-03-15
86
问题
Can Burglars Jam Your Wireless Security System?
A)Any product that promises to protect your home deserves careful examination. So it isn’t surprising that you’ll find plenty of strong opinions about the potential vulnerabilities of popular home-security systems.
B)The most likely type of burglary(入室盗窃)by far is the unsophisticated crime of opportunity, usually involving a broken window or some forced entry. According to the FBI, crimes like these accounted for roughly two-thirds of all household burglaries in the US in 2013. The wide majority of the rest were illegal, unforced entries that resulted from something like a window being left open. The odds of a criminal using technical means to bypass a security system are so small that the FBI doesn’t even track those statistics.
C)One of the main theoretical home-security concerns is whether or not a given system is vulnerable to being blocked from working altogether. With wired setups, the fear is that a burglar(入室盗贼)might be able to shut your system down simply by cutting the right cable. With a wireless setup, you stick battery-powered sensors up around your home that keep an eye on windows, doors, motion, and more. If they detect something wrong while the system is armed, they’ll transmit a wireless alert signal to a base station that will then raise the alarm. That approach will eliminate most cord-cutting concerns—but what about their wireless equivalent, jamming? With the right device tuned to the right frequency, what’s to stop a thief from jamming your setup and blocking that alert signal from ever reaching the base station?
D)Jamming concerns are nothing new, and they’re not unique to security systems. Any device that’s built to receive a wireless signal at a specific frequency can be overwhelmed by a stronger signal coming in on the same frequency. For comparison, let’s say you wanted to "jam" a conversation between two people—all you’d need to do is yell in the listener’s ear.
E)Security devices are required to list the frequencies they broadcast on—that means that a potential thief can find what they need to know with minimal Googling. They will, however, need to know what system they’re looking for. If you have a sign in your yard declaring what setup you use, that’d point them in the right direction, though at that point, we’re talking about a highly targeted, semi-sophisticated attack, and not the sort of forced-entry attack that makes up the majority of burglaries. It’s easier to find and acquire jamming equipment for some frequencies than it is for others.
F)Wireless security providers will often take steps to help combat the threat of jamming attacks. SimpliSafe, winner of our Editors’ Choice distinction, utilizes a special system that’s capable of separating incidental RF interference from targeted jamming attacks. When the system thinks it’s being jammed, it’ll notify you via push alert(推送警报). From there, it’s up to you to sound the alarm manually.
G)SimpliSafe was singled out in one recent article on jamming, complete with a video showing the entire system being effectively bypassed with handheld jamming equipment. After taking appropriate measures to contain the RF interference to our test lab, we tested the attack out for ourselves, and were able to verify that it’s possible with the right equipment. However, we also verified that SimpliSafe’s anti-jamming system works. It caught us in the act, sent an alert to my smartphone, and also listed our RF interference on the system’s event log. The team behind the article and video in question make no mention of the system, or whether or not it detected them.
H)We like the unique nature of that software. It means that a thief likely wouldn’t be able to Google how the system works, then figure out a way around it. Even if they could, SimpliSafe claims that its system is always evolving, and that it varies slightly from system to system, which means there wouldn’t be a universal magic formula for cracking it. Other systems also seem confident on the subject of jamming. The team at Frontpoint addresses the issue in a blog on its site, citing their own jam protection software and claiming that there aren’t any documented cases of a successful jam attack since the company began offering wireless security sensors in the 1980s.
I)Jamming attacks are absolutely possible. As said before, with the right equipment and the right know-how, it’s possible to jam any wireless transmission. But how probable is it that someone will successfully jam their way into your home and steal your stuff?
J)Let’s imagine that you live in a small home with a wireless security setup that offers a functional antijamming system. First, a thief is going to need to target your home, specifically. Then, he’s going to need to know the technical details of your system and acquire the specific equipment necessary for jamming your specific setup. Presumably, you keep your doors locked at night and while you’re away, so the thief will still need to break in. That means defeating the lock somehow, or breaking a window. He’ll need to be jamming you at this point, as a broken window or opened door would normally release the alarm. So, too, would the motion detectors in your home, so the thief will need to continue jamming once he’s inside and searching for things to steal. However, he’ll need to do so without tripping the anti-jamming system, the details of which he almost certainly does not have access to.
K)At the end of the day, these kinds of systems are primarily designed to protect against the sort of opportunistic smash-and-grab attack that makes up the majority of burglaries. They’re also only a single layer in what should ideally be a many-sided approach to securing your home, one that includes common sense things like sound locks and proper exterior lighting at night. No system is impenetrable, and none can promise to eliminate the worst case completely. Every one of them has vulnerabilities that a knowledgeable thief could theoretically exploit. A good system is one that keeps that worst-case setting as improbable as possible while also offering strong protection in the event of a less-extraordinary attack.
SimpliSafe’s device can send a warning to the house owner’s cellphone.
选项
答案
G
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/OzZ7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Becauselivestockproductionishighlyefficient.B、Becausemorepeoplewillbecomewealthier.C、Becauseitmayhelpdoublefo
A、Onewhoviolatesthetrafficregulation.B、Drivers-to-be.C、Onewhofailsintheroadtestexamination.D、Licenseexaminers.B
A、Thedecliningoilproduction.B、TheoutbreakoftheH1N1flu.C、ThedecliningGDPinMexico.D、TheeconomicdownturnintheUS
A、Theyrequestedtotransfertoasaferdepartment.B、Theyquitworktoprotecttheirunbornbabies.C、Theysoughthelpfromuni
A、Peoplewhoeatspoiledfoodmaygetsick.B、Farmershavetothrowawayspoiledproducts.C、Farmershavetosellthespoiledpr
随机试题
女性患者,50岁,2年前无明显谤因开始近事遗忘,逐渐出现逸事遗忘,1年前言语不清并进行性加重,定向力、计算力障碍,精神亢奋,余神经系统查体无异常。头MRI示脑萎缩。该患者最可能的诊断是
窝沟龋中主要的致龋菌为
基金营销的微观环境指与公司关系密切、能够影响公司服务顾客的能力的各种因素,主要包括()。
甲公司欠乙公司100万元到期货款无力偿还。乙公司经过调查后得知下列情况:丙公司与甲公司之间存在买卖合同,甲公司已经付款,但丙公司未按期交货;甲公司与丁公司之间存在大型机器设备买卖合同,丁公司分期付款,在付清全部货款之前甲公司保留该机器设备的所有权,现丁公司
如果你的一个亲人病了,而你手头没有足够的钱去给亲人交住院费。此时。你负责一个案件的当事人愿意为你垫付这笔钱。你将如何对待?
左边是给定的纸盒的外表面,下列哪一项能由它折叠而成?
记f(x)=,则方程f(x)=0的根().
一次和一个少言的朋友一起坐车,车程一个钟头左右,我们几乎一声不吭。我原本怕冷场,想找些话题,后来发现这寻找是不必要的。对于一个少言者,在他不想说时,【C1】______。碰到少言的人,也别轻易下定义,别轻易惊扰他的沉默。在另一个空间,他或许是个极
Specializationcanbeseenasaresponsetotheproblemofanincreasingaccumulationofscientificknowledge.Bysplittingupt
我们完全不知道他的计划。
最新回复
(
0
)