首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Marion Nestle’s heavyweight criticism against Coca-Cola and PepsiCo comes at an odd moment for the industry. Americans are drink
Marion Nestle’s heavyweight criticism against Coca-Cola and PepsiCo comes at an odd moment for the industry. Americans are drink
admin
2018-06-28
70
问题
Marion Nestle’s heavyweight criticism against Coca-Cola and PepsiCo comes at an odd moment for the industry. Americans are drinking fewer sugary sodas—in 2012 production was 23% below what it had been a decade earlier. Even sales of diet drinks are losing their fizz, as consumers question the merits of artificial sweeteners. From one angle, it would seem that health advocates such as Ms Nestle have won. Yet in America companies still produce 30 gallons of regular fizzy drinks per person per year. In many countries, particularly developing ones, consumption is on the rise.
Ms Nestle, a professor at New York University, is both inspired by recent progress and dissatisfied with it. That is no surprise. Her first book, Food Politics, remains a bible for those who complain about the power of food companies. In her new book she attacks the industry’s most widely consumed, least healthy product. Soda Politics, she says, is a book "to inspire readers to action". As a rallying cry, it is verbose. When readers learn on page 238 that she will pick up a particular subject in chapter 25, it is with no little dismay that they realize they are only on chapter 17. But what the author wants most is to craft a detailed guide to the producers’ alleged violation, and how to stop them.
Ms Nestle says she would have no complaint with sweet fizzy drinks if they were sipped occasionally, as a treat. However, for millions of people in many countries, they are not. In Mexico companies sold 372 cans of fizzy drinks per person in 2012. About half of Americans do not drink them regularly, but those who do are disproportionately poor, less educated, male, Hispanic or black. 10% of Americans down more than four cans a day.
Drinking a lot of sweet fizzy drinks is plainly unhealthy. Unlike a Big Mac, they have no nutritional value; nor do their calories satisfy hunger. One large study found that for each can added to a person’s daily diet, the risk of diabetes jumped by 22%. There are also links between sugar and heart disease, stroke and cancer. Drinking lots of sodas imposes clear costs on individuals, Ms Nestle argues, but it has a broader cost, too. American taxpayers subsidize corn production and let the poor use government food vouchers to buy fizzy drinks. More important, taxpayers
foot
the health bill for those who develop chronic disease.
According to the last paragraph, having too many soda drinks ______.
选项
A、can increase the risk of death
B、will inevitably lead to diabetes
C、may bring the problem of obesity
D、has something to do with certain diseases
答案
D
解析
细节题。定位到最后一段首句:Drinking a lot of sweet fizzy drinks is plainly unhealthy.其中a lot of=too many:fizzy drinks=soda drinks。故答案关键词为plainly unhealthy“显然不健康”。而更加完整的答案来自第三、四两句:One large study found that for each can added to a person’s daily diet,the risk of diabetes jumped by 22%.There are also links between sugar and heart disease.stroke and cancer.这两句明确指出喝太多碳酸饮料导致患糖尿病几率上升,而且摄入过多糖分与心脏病、中风和癌症有关联。故答案为[D]has something to do with certain diseases“与某些疾病有关系”。选项[A]can increase the risk of death“可能增加死亡的风险”;文章说the risk of diabetes jumped“患糖尿病风险增大”,该项属于过分夸大。[B]will inevitably lead to diabetes“势必引发糖尿病”;inevitably“不可避免地”一词过于绝对,原文说的是“患糖尿病风险增加22%”。[C]may bring the problem of obesity“可能造成肥胖症”;该项的obesity“肥胖症”一词在文中并没有出现。综上[D]正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PA6Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
HowdoyouexplaineconomicsinplainEnglish?TheFederalReserveBankofNewYorkhasbeenansweringthequestionwithaneven
HowdoyouexplaineconomicsinplainEnglish?TheFederalReserveBankofNewYorkhasbeenansweringthequestionwithaneven
Ifyouhavehighbloodpressure,you’reingood【C1】______.Hypertensionaffects67millionAmericans,includingnearlytwo-third
Ifyouhavehighbloodpressure,you’reingood【C1】______.Hypertensionaffects67millionAmericans,includingnearlytwo-third
Ifyouhavehighbloodpressure,you’reingood【C1】______.Hypertensionaffects67millionAmericans,includingnearlytwo-third
Asimpleideasupportsscience:"trust,butverify".Resultsshouldalwaysbe【C1】______tochallengefromexperiment.Thatsimple
Twiceayear,inspringandautumn,London’sfashionistasgo【B1】______atthesecondoftheworld’s"bigfour"fashionweeks.Fro
CigarettesmokingisahealthhazardofsufficientimportanceintheUnitedStates.Itwas50yearsagothismonththatAmerica’
Eatinghealthilycostsabout$1.50moreperpersondaily,accordingtothemostthoroughreviewyetoftheaffordabilityofahe
随机试题
A、f(2x)B、2f(x)C、-f(2x)D、-2f(x)A本题考查的知识点为可变上限积分求导:若f(x)为连续函数,则F’(x)=,即可变上限的导数为被积函数在上限处值.因此故选A.[错误防范]有些考生误选B.如果
按腧穴可诊断胃病的穴位有
某患者,毛发脱落,呈斑秃,并伴有乏力,下肢无力、发麻,视力下降,失眠,长期居住在废弃的矿渣附近。该患者最有可能是
个人住房贷款与房价款的比例最高为()。
对于通过函证程序无法证实的应收账款,注册会计师应当执行的最有效的审计程序是( )。注册会计师在审计过程中,可以采用函证程序获取充分、适当的审计证据。根据函证秸序的操作特性,这一程序最易发现下列( )存在的问题。
下列能分别对应帝王的谥号、庙号、年号的是()。
美国《1787年宪法》不允许奴隶制的存在。()
未经()许可,人民警察无权擅自变更、转让或者放弃权力。
乙与丙发生口角,甲知此事后,找到乙,谎称自己受丙所托带口信给乙,若乙不拿3000元给丙,就将派人来打乙,乙很害怕,就托甲将3000元带给丙,甲将钱占为己有。对甲的行为应()。
条件“Not工资额>2000”的含义是
最新回复
(
0
)