首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2017-03-25
27
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the word "negligence" mean in the passage?
选项
A、ignorance
B、arrogance
C、carelessness
D、depression
答案
C
解析
根据文中第三段的“Mr.Farwell,an engineer,lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track.”可知:法威尔先生是铁路部门的名工程师。当名扳道工因疏忽而导致车头脱离轨道时,法威尔失去了右手。从中可以推知,negligence意为“疏忽,过失”。四个选项中,ignorance意为“无知,愚昧”,arrogance意为“傲慢”,carelessness意为“粗心,疏忽”,depression意为“沮丧;经济大萧条”。据此可知,C项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PKGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
SouthKorea’shagwon(privatetutoringacademies)crackdownisonepartofalargerquesttotamethecountry’scultureofeducati
Itisatouchingscenethateveryparentcanimmediately______becausetheyhavegonethroughthesameritualwiththeirownchil
Wheneverabigcompany______asmallone,theproductalmostalwaysgetsworse.
Don’tcallhimjustacollegeprofessor.Internetentrepreneur,TVpersonality,advisertopresidents,andfriendtotherichan
Inolddays,whenaglimpseofstockingwaslookeduponassomethingfartooshockingtodistracttheseriousworkofanoffice,
Becauseofarecentobstacleinproduction,saleshavedroppedandaccordinglyprofitshave______.
Thinkaboutwhatwouldmakeyoureally,reallyhappy.Moremoney?Wrong.Smiling,well-adjustedkids?Wrongagain.Thefactisw
Americansocietyisnotnap(午睡)friendly.Infact,saysDavidDinges,asleepspecialistattheUniversityofPennsylvaniaSchool
Specializationcanbeseenasaresponsetotheproblemofanincreasingaccumulationofscientificknowledge.Bysplittingupth
随机试题
脂肪动员的限速酶是
按照五味理论,下列药物中具有辛味的是
某患者由印尼入境后2天。频繁腹泻,无腹痛及里急后重,伴有呕吐。最重要的检查是()
A、利水渗湿,健脾B、利水渗湿,退黄C、利尿通淋止泻D、利水通淋,清心E、利水通淋,止痛海金沙的功效是
下列关于电信立法目的表述错误的是()。
病毒式网络营销是通过用户的口碑宣传网络,信息像病毒一样传播和扩散,利用快速复制的方式传向数以千计、数以百万计的受众。根据上述定义,下列选项中没有应用病毒式网络营销手段的是()。
最简单的交换排序方法是()。
Whatisthewomanlookingfor?
WhatisTina’sattitudetowardstheadvertisement?
StatesExperimentwithOut-of-ClassroomLearning[A]AttheendofAugust,mostofOhio’steenagerswillshakeofftheirsummerti
最新回复
(
0
)