首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Google may be valued at more than $185 billion and boast millions of users, but that doesn’t mean the Internet giant is any matc
Google may be valued at more than $185 billion and boast millions of users, but that doesn’t mean the Internet giant is any matc
admin
2020-05-01
219
问题
Google may be valued at more than $185 billion and boast millions of users, but that doesn’t mean the Internet giant is any match for the diminutive French President Nicolas Sarkozy. On Dec. 8, Sarkozy warned Google he would not allow France to be "stripped" of its literary heritage, an apparent reference to Google’s enormous book-digitizing project. "We won’t let ourselves be stripped of our heritage to the benefit of a big company, no matter how friendly, big or American it is," Sarkozy said during a round-table discussion in eastern France. "We are not going to be stripped of what generations and generations have produced in the French language, just because we weren’t capable of funding our own digitization project."
Sarkozy’s oratorical histrionics are becoming a regular occurrence. But the French President isn’t the only European David ready to stand up to the Internet Goliath and its formidable archiving project. Last October, German Chancellor Angela Merkel reiterated concerns held by many German publishers. The German government, she said, rejected "the scanning of books without any copyright protection like Google is doing. We refuse to permit simple scanning of books without full protection of intellectual-property rights." The French and German complaints are part of a growing move in the European Union to head off Google’s mass digitization of literature. "It is not up to any individual organization to determine policy on a matter as important as the digitization of our global heritage," French Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand told the Journal du Dimanche following a meeting of his E.U. peers in late November to discuss a united, state-led approach to the matter. "I’m not going to leave this issue up to simple laissez-faire."
Google has already digitized some 10 million books—most of them "public domain" works that are out of print, or books whose copyright owners are unknown. Google’s strategy thus far appears to have been to scan first, and deal with any copyright issues later—a method that worries authors and publishers. Justice authorities in the U.S. and in Europe have warned Google that it should not secure a monopoly position that would allow it to single-handedly dictate how much the public must pay to access many of the world’s great books.
Google and its backers—which include industrial partner Sony as well as libraries in the U.S. and Europe—argue that the company brings rare books often only obtainable by students, scholars and researchers to the general public online for free. It says it’s also setting aside funding to pay to unknown copyright owners who step up and ask for
remuneration
, or remove works by those who don’t want to be in Google’s archive.
Opponents—these include several European governments and publishers, and the Open Access Alliance formed by authors and Google rivals like Yahoo! and Microsoft — describe that as a kind of massive, literary landgrab which ignores copyright concerns until owners demand they be paid or their books removed. They also fear Google’s initially free search-and-access service will give way to a pay scheme. Confusing matters further, libraries, publishers and writers in both the U.S. and Europe are split in pro- and anti-Google Book camps.
The California-based giant has already made some concessions to publishers. Under a pending settlement reached with U.S. publishers’ groups, Google has agreed to limit its archiving to works that have been registered in the U.S., or come from the U.K., Australia, and Canada—English-speaking countries whose authors are present in American libraries. That agreement would nominally exclude books from countries like France and Germany, and from China, which has also objected to the digitization project on copyright grounds. Still, the accord must be approved by a U.S. federal court review in February—not a slam-dunk affair, given the American Justice Department’s concerns that the agreement still breaks "fundamental copyright principles".
Google has another court date it is preparing for. Paris publishing group La Martiniere took Google to court after it discovered the firm had scanned and archived books on which La Martiniere holds the copyright. It’s asking for $15 million in damages for the violation. If it wins—a ruling is expected on Dec. 18—the case will help set an important legal precedent on Google’s approach. Google France declined to comment on the court case, but noted its scanning work with 30 libraries and 30,000 private publishers has provoked little legal challenge. Could that change soon? "We feel confident we’ll win on the most important legal points in this case, which is important to establish precedent awaiting the U.S. hearing in February," notes Tessa Destais, an adviser to La Martiniere. "We’re not anti-Google—it’s a wonderful company. We’re simply insisting it obey copyright laws, and start negotiating with publishers as partners."
What can be inferred from the passage?
选项
A、Writers in Europe object to the digitizing project.
B、Google’s digitizing project is popular in the U. S.
C、Google will change its approach and pay for the copyright.
D、Not all the people concerned object to the digitizing project.
答案
D
解析
推断题。由最后一段可知,人们并不是反对谷歌公司的数字化工程,而是希望其遵守版权法,保护作者的合法权益。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PMbK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、SeekasubstitutefortheInternet.B、ExaminetheirpatternsofInternetuse.C、Questionthemselvesnowandthen.D、Usecomput
ThePurposesofLiteraryAnalysisI.IntroductionLiteraryanalysisisinitselfauniversalnecessity.—reason1:enablesrea
ThePurposesofLiteraryAnalysisI.IntroductionLiteraryanalysisisinitselfauniversalnecessity.—reason1:enablesrea
PASSAGETWOWhatdoestheword"leash"implyinPara.7?
PASSAGEONETowhichdirectiondothethornsextendtheirbranchesaccordingtoPara.2?
AdviceforStudents:HowtoTalktoProfessorsI.IntroductionA.Professors:normalpeople,justlikeeveryoneelseB.Student
AdviceforStudents:HowtoTalktoProfessorsI.IntroductionA.Professors:normalpeople,justlikeeveryoneelseB.Student
A、Theyareratherdifficulttoplease.B、Theyarerudetowomendrivers.C、Theyaretalkativeandgenerouswithtips.D、Theyare
Globalwarminggetsblamedforjustabouteverythingthesedays;notenoughsnow,toomuchrain,risingsealevels,whatever.He
随机试题
发散思维
患者,女,30岁。反复上腹痛5年,以餐前明显,伴腹胀。近1周腹痛加重。体格检查未发现明显阳性体征。问题3:提示:患者胃镜检查无明显异常。诊断最可能为1.功能性消化不良2.胆总管结石3.胰腺癌4.功能性腹痛5.急性胰腺炎6.胃食管反流病
建筑物对感应雷的防护措施为()。
按照《电信运营业重大事故报告规定(试行)》,电信运营业重大事故包括()。
开放式基金的买卖价格以()为基础。
当货币乘数m=8,法定存款准备率r=5%,超额准备金率e=3%,则现金漏损率c为()。
(2013年卷二第15题)张某欠李某30万元借款到期未还。张某得知李某准备向人民法院起诉索款,便将自己价值50余万元的房产无偿转让给赵某,从而使自己名下无任何可供执行的财产。根据合同法及相关规定,李某得知这一情况后,可通过下列哪种途径维护自己的合法权益?
中外不同作家的“三部曲”,下列选项中有错误的是:
聚光灯效应:聚光灯在我们的意识中比在现实中更为闪亮的照耀着我们。用在人身上,就是指我们倾向于高估我们的行为、外貌和情感在他人眼中的显著性。根据上述定义,下列体现了聚光灯效应的是:
Whatisthewoman’sreply?
最新回复
(
0
)