首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
admin
2013-09-24
38
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image: libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read more, or at least buy more— several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will—well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way—a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books—have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. I can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless. I was brought up by people who had been taught and who taught me- that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them. I should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient— yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
When the author sees the same books on the shelf year after year, he feels______.
选项
答案
comfortable
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PUc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
AnimalsontheMoveItlookedlikeascenefrom"Jaws"butwithoutthedramaticmusic.Ahugesharkwaslowlyswimmingthrou
Universitiesarenolonger【B1】______emptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmovein,eventothemostunlikel
Generouspublicfundingofbasicsciencewould______considerablebenefitsforthecountry’shealth,wealthandsecurity.
Untiljustafewyearsago,makingababyboyorababygirlwasprettymuchahit-or-miss(偶然的,碰运气的)affair.Notanymore.Paren
Thefirstmoving-picturetheaterwasprobablytheworkofHarryDavis,Pittsburgh’smostprosperousshowman.In1904,herented
Theunauthorized(未经授权的)copyingofcomputerprogramsbyAmericanbusinessesalonedeprivedsoftwarepublishersof$1.6billion
Therecentoutbreakofbirdfluresultsin______.H5N1isaflustrain______.
TheFlyingPhoneBoxAsurpriseforairtravelersThestridesmadeinsatellite-communicationstechnologyinrecentyear
Forsometimepastithasbeenwidelyacceptedthatbabies--andothercreatures--learntodothingsbecausecertainactsleadto
随机试题
Rh血型系统中抗原性最强的抗原是
社区健康促进的核心策略是
男性,35岁,稍长距离步行后感右小腿疼痛,肌肉抽搐而破行,稍休息后症状消失。平时感右足发凉,怕冷,有麻木感,右足背动脉搏动减弱。应考虑()
应收账款计提坏账准备金,其根据是()。
下列关于无形资产的会计处理中,正确的有()。
党和国家机关工作人员在国内交往中,_____收受_____影响公正执行公务的礼品馈赠,因为各种原因_____拒收的礼品,_____登记上交。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
在有史以来的教育中,除()以外,都具有阶级性的特征。
彼得原理:是美国学者劳伦斯.彼得在对组织中人员晋升的相关现象研究后得出的一个结论,即在各种组织中,由于习惯于对在某个等级上称职的人员进行晋升提拔,因而雇员总是趋向于晋升到其不称职的地位。彼得原理有时也被称为“向上爬”原理。下列现象中符合彼得原理的是
有10个家庭各自带孩子参加幼儿园的儿童节联欢,孩子们被分为3组做游戏,每组5人。每个家庭至多带3个孩子,则下列说法中正确的是()
(1991年)将函数f(x)=2+|x|(一1≤x≤1)展开成以2为周期的傅里叶级数,并由此求级数的和.
最新回复
(
0
)