首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
There is a substantial body of evidence showing that HIV causes AIDS—and that antiretroviral treatment (ART) has turned the vira
There is a substantial body of evidence showing that HIV causes AIDS—and that antiretroviral treatment (ART) has turned the vira
admin
2019-08-17
6
问题
There is a substantial body of evidence showing that HIV causes AIDS—and that antiretroviral treatment (ART) has turned the viral infection from a death sentence into a chronic disease. Yet a small group of AIDS denialists keeps alive the conspiratorial argument that ART is harmful and that HIV science has been corrupted by commercial interests. Unfortunately, AIDS denialist have had a disproportionate effect on efforts to stem the AIDS epidemic. In 2000, South African President Thabo Mbeki took these claims seriously, opting to debate the issue, thus delaying the introduction of ART into the South African public health sector. At least 330,000 South Africans died unnecessarily as a result.
The "hero scientist" of AIDS denialism, University of California, Berkeley, virologist Peter Dues-berg, argues that HIV is a harmless passenger virus and that ART is toxic, even a cause of AIDS. He has done no clinical research on HIV and ignores the many rebuttals of his claims in the scientific literature. In 1993, John Maddox, then editor of Nature, complained that Duesberg was "wrongly using tendentious arguments to confuse understanding of AIDS," and that because he was not engaging as a scientist, he would no longer be granted an automatic "right of reply. "
More recently, in 2009, ADIS activists and HIV scientists, including Nobel Laureate Francoise Barre-Sinoussi, complained to Elsevier, the publisher of Medical Hypotheses, when that journal published a paper by Duesberg defending Mbeki and denying the existence of the African AIDS epidemic. Medical Hypotheses had a policy against peer review, so Elsevier asked The Lancet to oversee a peer review of the paper. When the panel of reviewers unanimously recommended rejection, Elsevier permanently withdrew it and forced Medical Hypotheses to introduce peer review. Last December Duesberg published a reworked version in an Italian journal, sparking further controversy and protests from the journal’s editorial board, one of whom has already resigned.
Efforts by scientists to defend science are supplemented by pro-science activists operating on the Internet. Physician, author, and blogger Ben Goldacre argued in his Guardian column Bad Science that a "ragged band of bloggers from all walks of life" has been very successful at exposing pseudo-scientific claims and cheating alternative practitioners selling quack cures. The Internet now poses a double-edged sword for AIDS denialists. It is becoming a tougher place for people to segregate themselves in a comfortable cocoon of the like-minded. While the web allows denialists to advertise their ideas and build networks, it also exposes potential converts to scientific rebuttals of their claims, as well news about the deaths of the "living icons" —high-profile HIV-positive people who rejected ART.
The key living icon for AIDS denialism was Christine Maggiore. She founded Alive & Well AIDS Alternatives (an organization with Duesberg on its board), campaigned against the use of ART to prevent mothers passing HIV to their babies, and met President Mbeki. Despite her 3-year-old daughter’s succumbing to AIDS, Maggiore remained firmly opposed to HIV science and ART. She opted for alternative therapies and died at the age of 52, from AIDS-related infections.
Scientists often have a tough time responding to anti-science conspiracy theories because their integrity is attacked by the conspiratorial moves made against them. But precisely because living icons like Maggiore lent confidence to AIDS denialism by appearing to offer "living proof" that the science of HIV pathogenesis and treatment is wrong, pro-science activists maintain a list of denialists who have died of AIDS. The weapons of science and reason are still very much in contention, but the gloves have come off in a broader struggle over credibility.
Which of the following would be the best title for the text?
选项
A、Double-sidedness of ART
B、HIV Science in Action
C、The Monster of AIDS Denialism
D、The Fight against AIDS Conspiracy
答案
C
解析
主旨大意题。第一段介绍艾滋病主流派和非主流派观点(即艾滋病否定主义),重点指出非主流派观点给艾滋病治疗带来严重的不良影响;第二、三段进一步介绍非主流派代表人物观点;第四、五段分析网络给非主流派带来的利弊并以活象征论证其带给非主流派的双重作用;末段指出主流派与非主流派之间更广泛的信誉之争业已展开。文章围绕主流派和非主流派展开论述,重在说明非主流派来势汹汹,给主流派带来压力和挑战,故答案为C项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PVra777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Thereissubstantialevidencethatby1926,withthepublicationofTheWearyBlues,LangstonHugheshadbrokenwithtwowell-es
Thereissubstantialevidencethatby1926,withthepublicationofTheWearyBlues,LangstonHugheshadbrokenwithtwowell-es
Thereissubstantialevidencethatby1926,withthepublicationofTheWearyBlues,LangstonHugheshadbrokenwithtwowell-es
Nearlyacenturyago,biologistsfoundthatiftheyseparatedaninvertebrateanimalembryointotwopartsatanearlystageof
Nearlyacenturyago,biologistsfoundthatiftheyseparatedaninvertebrateanimalembryointotwopartsatanearlystageof
Nearlyacenturyago,biologistsfoundthatiftheyseparatedaninvertebrateanimalembryointotwopartsatanearlystageof
Therealstakesweremeasuredinprestige,statepower,andinternational______,thingsthatusuallyfallintothesphereofint
"Commonlanguage"hereusuallymeansaforeignlanguage,butthesamepointappliesinprinciple______anyencounterwithunfami
Ihadneverseensomanypeoplewithsomanydisabilities.Ireturnedhome,silendy______,thinkinghowfortunatewereallywere
随机试题
女性,46岁,偶然发现右乳房肿物10天,肿物未见明显增大。查体:右乳房外上象限1.5cm×1.5cm×1.5cm肿物,质中,无压痛,表面不光滑,边界不清楚,活动度好,与局部皮肤有少许粘连。最可能的诊断是
如果注册会计师采用以控制测试为主的方式进行存货监盘,并准备信赖被审计单位存货盘点的控制措施与程序,则其实施的绝大部分审计程序将限于()。
临床照射一个位于骨组织后的软组织病灶应该选择
竹茹可以治疗的病证是旋覆花可以治疗的病证是
女,19岁。1个月来多汗、易饥饿,有时心悸,体重下降(具体未测)。查体:晨起脉搏112次/分,BP120/55mmHg,甲状腺Ⅰ度肿大,可闻及血管杂音。心电图示窦性心动过速。对Graves病诊断最有意义的体征是
钩端螺旋体病的临床表现为
患者,女性,45岁,失血性休克,正在进行扩容治疗,测得CVP5cmH2O,血压70/55mmHg,应()
工业管道系统试验的类型主要包括()等试验。
根据《危险性较大的分部分项工程安全管理办法》规定,起重吊装工程中属于超过一定规模的危险性较大的分部分项工程有()。
股票基金在2013年12月31日,其净值为1亿元,2014年4月15日基金净值为9500万元;有投资者在2014年4月15日客户申购2000万元,2014年9月1日基金净值为1.4亿元;2014年9月1日,基金分红1000万元,2014年12月31日基金
最新回复
(
0
)