首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice
admin
2010-07-19
57
问题
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice synthesizer, or perhaps in sign language, the lucky ape will argue that it has a fundamental right to liberty. "This is going to be a very important case." Duke University law Prof. William Reppy Jr. told the New York Times.
Reppy concedes that apes can talk only at the level of a human 4-year-old, so they may not be ready to discuss abstractions like oppression and freedom. Just last month, one ape did manage to say through a synthesizer: "Please buy me a hamburger." That may not sound like crucial testimony, but lawyers think that the spectacle of an ape saying anything at all in court may change a lot of minds about the status of animals as property.
One problem is that apes probably won’t be able to convince judges that they know right from wrong, or that they intend to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Since they are not persons, they don’t even have legal standing to sue. No problem, says Steven Wise, who taught animal law for 10 years at Vermont law school and is now teaching Harvard law school’s first course in the subject. He says lawyers should be able to use slavery-era statutes that authorized legal nonpersons (slaves) to bring lawsuits. Gary Francione, who teaches animal law at Rutgers University, says that gorillas "should be declared to be persons under the constitution."
Unlike mainstream animal-welfare activists, radical animal-rights activists think that all animals are morally equal and have rights, though not necessarily the same rights as humans. So the law’s denial of rights to animals is simply a matter of bias-speciesism. It’s even an expression of bias to talk about protecting wildlife, since this assumes that human control and domination of other species is acceptable. These are surely far-out ideas. "Would even bacteria have rights?" asks one exasperated law professor, Richard Epstein of the University of Chicago Law School.
For the moment, the radicals want to confine the rights discussion to apes and chimps, mostly to avoid the obvious mockery about litigious lemmings, cockroach liberation, and the issue of whether a hyena eating an antelope is committing a rights violation that should be brought before the world court in the Hague. One wag wrote a poem containing the line, "Every beast within his paws/Will clutch an order to show cause."
The news is that law schools are increasingly involved in animal issues. Any radical notion that vastly inflates the concept of rights and requires a lot more litigation is apt to take root in the law schools. ("Some lawyers say they are in the field to advance their ideology, but some note that it is an area of legal practice that could be profitable," reports the New York Times.)
A dozen law schools now feature courses on animal law, and in some cases at least, the teaching seems to be a simple extension of radical activism. The course description of next spring’s "Animal Law Seminar" at Georgetown University Law Center, for instance, makes clear to students which opinions are the correct ones to have, It talks about the plight of "rightless plaintiffs" and promises to examine how and why laws "purporting to protect" animals have failed.
Ideas about humane treatment of animals are indeed changing. Many of us have changed our minds about furs, zoos, slaughterhouse techniques, and at least some forms of animal experimentation. The debate about greater concern for the animal world continues. But the alliance between the radicals and the lawyers means that, once again, an issue that ought to be taken to the people and resolved by democratic means will most likely be pre-empted by judges and lawyers. Steven Wise talks of using the courts to knock down the wall between humans and apes. Once apes have rights, he says, the status of other animals can be decided by other courts and other litigation.
The advantage of the litigation strategy is that there’s no need to sell radical ideas to the American people. There are almost no takers for the concept of "nonhuman personhood," the view of pets as slaves, or the notion that meat eating is part of "a specter of oppression" that equally afflicts minorities, women, and animals in America. You can supersede open debate by convincing a few judges to detect a "rights" issue that functions as a political trump card. The rhetoric is high-minded, but the strategy is to force change without gaining the consent of the public.
Converting every controversy into a "rights" issue is by now a knee-jerk response. Harvard Law Prof. Mary Ann Glendon, author of Rights Talk, writes about our legal culture’s "lost language of obligation." Instead of casting arguments in terms of human responsibility for the natural world, rights talkers automatically spin out tortured arguments about "rights" of animals and even about the "rights" of trees and mountains. This is how "rights talk" becomes a parody of itself. Let’s hope the lawyers and the law schools eventually get the joke. (853 words)
Which of the following is true?
选项
A、Last month, one 4 years old ape managed to say something through a synthesizer.
B、Bacteria should have rights is a ludicrous statement.
C、All gorillas are suing for their constitutional rights.
D、No one cares about animal rights, in fact.
答案
B
解析
“细菌也有权利”显然是荒谬的,作者在文中也提到了这一点。A选项中“4 years old”没有提及。C、 D错误较为明显。事实上,还是有人在关心动物权利的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PklO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
【B1】【B4】
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisINCORRECTaboutDavid’spersonalbackground?
Theoceanbottom—aregionnearly2.5timesgreaterthanthetotallandareaoftheearth—isavastfrontierthateventodayisl
Societywasfascinatedbyscienceandscientificthingsinthenineteenthcentury.Greatbreakthroughsinengineering,theuseo
Cooperationistheonlysafeguardwehaveagainstthedevelopmentofneurotictendencies.Itisthereforeveryimportantthatch
TheWorldHealthOrganizationsaysitsten-yearcampaigntoremoveleprosyasaworldhealthproblemhasbeensuccessful.Doctor
Inviewoftheobstaclesinlaunchingnewindustriesforwhichaccesstomarketsisacriticallocationfactor,whatkindoffac
DidMarcoPoloTelltheTruth?ThereisacontroversyaboutMarcoPolo’striptoChina.DidMarcoPolotellthetruth?Ifyo
DidMarcoPoloTelltheTruth?ThereisacontroversyaboutMarcoPolo’striptoChina.DidMarcoPolotellthetruth?Ifyo
A、Mexico.B、Urugray.C、China.D、Venezucla.B
随机试题
毛泽东在《论持久战》中指出,中国抗日战争取得胜利最关键的阶段是()
系统地设计、收集、分析和提出数据资料,并提供与企业所面临的特定营销状况有关的调查结果指的是()
下列关于顺规散光哪项是正确的
蝉蜕的主治病证有( )。
同升公司以一套价值100万元的设备作为抵押,向甲借款10万元,未办理抵押登记手续。同升公司又向乙借款80万元,以该套设备作为抵押,并办理了抵押登记手续。同升公司欠丙货款20万元,将该套设备出质给丙。丙不小心损坏了该套设备送丁修理,因欠丁5万元修理费,该套设
下列项目中,在资产负债表中反映的有( )。
我国《票据法》规定的票据包括()。
根据合同法的规定,下列哪些属于当事人可以请求人民法院变更或者撤销的合同?
据考古发现,今广西地域早在100万年前就有原始人类繁衍生息。()
步骤1单击[公式]选项卡[函数库]组中的[逻辑]→[IF]函数,输入数据,如图3—18所示。[*]步骤2单击函数面板,打开对话框,输入数据,如图3—19所示。[*]步骤3单击[确定]按钮,后拖动单元格F3的填充按钮至F7。本题主要考核“
最新回复
(
0
)