首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice
admin
2010-07-19
64
问题
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice synthesizer, or perhaps in sign language, the lucky ape will argue that it has a fundamental right to liberty. "This is going to be a very important case." Duke University law Prof. William Reppy Jr. told the New York Times.
Reppy concedes that apes can talk only at the level of a human 4-year-old, so they may not be ready to discuss abstractions like oppression and freedom. Just last month, one ape did manage to say through a synthesizer: "Please buy me a hamburger." That may not sound like crucial testimony, but lawyers think that the spectacle of an ape saying anything at all in court may change a lot of minds about the status of animals as property.
One problem is that apes probably won’t be able to convince judges that they know right from wrong, or that they intend to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Since they are not persons, they don’t even have legal standing to sue. No problem, says Steven Wise, who taught animal law for 10 years at Vermont law school and is now teaching Harvard law school’s first course in the subject. He says lawyers should be able to use slavery-era statutes that authorized legal nonpersons (slaves) to bring lawsuits. Gary Francione, who teaches animal law at Rutgers University, says that gorillas "should be declared to be persons under the constitution."
Unlike mainstream animal-welfare activists, radical animal-rights activists think that all animals are morally equal and have rights, though not necessarily the same rights as humans. So the law’s denial of rights to animals is simply a matter of bias-speciesism. It’s even an expression of bias to talk about protecting wildlife, since this assumes that human control and domination of other species is acceptable. These are surely far-out ideas. "Would even bacteria have rights?" asks one exasperated law professor, Richard Epstein of the University of Chicago Law School.
For the moment, the radicals want to confine the rights discussion to apes and chimps, mostly to avoid the obvious mockery about litigious lemmings, cockroach liberation, and the issue of whether a hyena eating an antelope is committing a rights violation that should be brought before the world court in the Hague. One wag wrote a poem containing the line, "Every beast within his paws/Will clutch an order to show cause."
The news is that law schools are increasingly involved in animal issues. Any radical notion that vastly inflates the concept of rights and requires a lot more litigation is apt to take root in the law schools. ("Some lawyers say they are in the field to advance their ideology, but some note that it is an area of legal practice that could be profitable," reports the New York Times.)
A dozen law schools now feature courses on animal law, and in some cases at least, the teaching seems to be a simple extension of radical activism. The course description of next spring’s "Animal Law Seminar" at Georgetown University Law Center, for instance, makes clear to students which opinions are the correct ones to have, It talks about the plight of "rightless plaintiffs" and promises to examine how and why laws "purporting to protect" animals have failed.
Ideas about humane treatment of animals are indeed changing. Many of us have changed our minds about furs, zoos, slaughterhouse techniques, and at least some forms of animal experimentation. The debate about greater concern for the animal world continues. But the alliance between the radicals and the lawyers means that, once again, an issue that ought to be taken to the people and resolved by democratic means will most likely be pre-empted by judges and lawyers. Steven Wise talks of using the courts to knock down the wall between humans and apes. Once apes have rights, he says, the status of other animals can be decided by other courts and other litigation.
The advantage of the litigation strategy is that there’s no need to sell radical ideas to the American people. There are almost no takers for the concept of "nonhuman personhood," the view of pets as slaves, or the notion that meat eating is part of "a specter of oppression" that equally afflicts minorities, women, and animals in America. You can supersede open debate by convincing a few judges to detect a "rights" issue that functions as a political trump card. The rhetoric is high-minded, but the strategy is to force change without gaining the consent of the public.
Converting every controversy into a "rights" issue is by now a knee-jerk response. Harvard Law Prof. Mary Ann Glendon, author of Rights Talk, writes about our legal culture’s "lost language of obligation." Instead of casting arguments in terms of human responsibility for the natural world, rights talkers automatically spin out tortured arguments about "rights" of animals and even about the "rights" of trees and mountains. This is how "rights talk" becomes a parody of itself. Let’s hope the lawyers and the law schools eventually get the joke. (853 words)
Which of the following is true?
选项
A、Last month, one 4 years old ape managed to say something through a synthesizer.
B、Bacteria should have rights is a ludicrous statement.
C、All gorillas are suing for their constitutional rights.
D、No one cares about animal rights, in fact.
答案
B
解析
“细菌也有权利”显然是荒谬的,作者在文中也提到了这一点。A选项中“4 years old”没有提及。C、 D错误较为明显。事实上,还是有人在关心动物权利的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PklO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheauthorthinksthatDanesadopta______attitudetowardstheircountry.Theauthor’sreactiontothestatementbytheMinis
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisINCORRECTaboutDavid’spersonalbackground?
ThePresidentduringtheAmericanCivilWarwas______.
ANewZealanderofEuropeandescentisknownasa
Thebesttitleofthispassagewouldbe______.WhatcanheinferredfromtheMichaelFaycase?
WhowrotetheDeclarationofIndependenceandlaterbecametheU.S.President?
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamess【M1】_____bas
得病以前,我受父母宠爱,在家中横行霸道,一旦隔离,拘禁在花园山坡上一幢小房子里,我顿感打入冷宫,十分郁郁不得志起来。一个春天的傍晚,园中百花怒放,父母在园中设宴,一时宾客云集,笑语四溢。我在山坡的小屋里,悄悄掀起窗帘,窥见园中大千世界,一片繁华,自己的哥姐
Inviewoftheobstaclesinlaunchingnewindustriesforwhichaccesstomarketsisacriticallocationfactor,whatkindoffac
TheInternetisabouttotakeoffinChina.Asmanyas9millionpeopleareonline,anumberthatisestimatedtohit20million
随机试题
汇兑心理说认为,人们需要外国货币的理由包括()
A.贲门部B.胃窦C.胃角和胃小弯D.胃体E.幽门部胃溃疡好发于
根据《会计法》的规定,()对本单位的会计工作和会计资料的真实性。完整性负责。
理财规划的原则包括( )。
如果当前资本市场弱式有效,下列说法,正确的是()。
个人在公司任职、受雇,同时兼任该公司董事、监事的,应将董事费、监事费与个人工资收入合并,统一按“工资、薪金所得”项目缴纳个人所得税。()
“一朝被蛇咬,十年怕井绳”属于条件反射的()。
人们相信,属于强震的年代远未结束,因为科学无法给出让人_______的理由。太平洋板块、澳大利亚板块、印度板块,这三个以海洋为主的板块的旋转角速度都在增加,这为大规模地震的爆发_______了足够的能量。已有的研究还表明,全球地震活动显著增强的时间大约滞后
根据我国《专利法》的规定,()的发明创造不能被授予专利权。
某项目的主要约束是质量,为了不让该项目的项目团队感觉时间过于紧张,项目经理在估算项目活动历时的时候应采用(47),以避免进度风险。
最新回复
(
0
)