首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Must the Poor Go Hungry Just So the Rich Can Drive? Sports stars like Mo Farah will not change a simple fact: people are sta
Must the Poor Go Hungry Just So the Rich Can Drive? Sports stars like Mo Farah will not change a simple fact: people are sta
admin
2013-09-26
39
问题
Must the Poor Go Hungry Just So the Rich Can Drive?
Sports stars like Mo Farah will not change a simple fact: people are starving because of the west’s thirst for biofuels.
I don’t blame Mo Farah, Pele and Haile Gebrselassie, who lined up, all hugs and smiles, outside Downing Street for a photocall at the prime minister’s hunger summit. Perhaps they were unaware of the way in which they were being used to promote David Cameron’s corporate approach to overseas aid. Perhaps they were also unaware of the crime against humanity over which he presides. Perhaps Cameron himself is unaware of it.
You should by now have heard about the famine developing in the Sahel region of West Africa. Poor harvests and high food prices threaten the lives of some 18 million people. The global price of food is likely to rise still further, as a result of low crop yields in the United States, caused by the worst drought in 50 years. World cereal prices, in response to this disaster, climbed 17% last month.
We have been cautious about attributing such events to climate change; perhaps too cautious. A new paper by James Hansen, head of Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, shows that there has been a sharp increase in the frequency of extremely hot summers. Between 1951 and 1980 these events affected between 0.1% and 0.2% of the world’s land surface each year. Now, on average, they affect 10% . Hansen explains that " the odds that natural variability created these extremes are extremely small, vanishingly small". Both the droughts in the Sahel and the US crop failures are likely to be the result of climate change.
But this is not the only sense in which the rich world’s use of fuel is causing the poor to starve. In the United Kingdom, in the rest of the European Union and in the United States, governments have chosen to deploy a cure as bad as the disease. Despite overwhelming evidence of the harm their policy is causing, none of them will change course.
Biofuels are the means by which governments in the rich world avoid hard choices. Rather than raise fuel economy standards as far as technology allows, rather than promoting a shift from driving to public transport, walking and cycling, rather than insisting on better town planning to reduce the need to travel, they have chosen to exchange our wild overconsumption of petroleum for the wild overconsumption of fuel made from crops. No one has to drive less or make a better car: everything remains the same except the source of fuel. The result is a competition between the world’s richest, and poorest consumers, a contest between overconsumption and survival.
There was never any doubt about which side would win.
I’ve been banging on about this since 2004, and everything I warned of then has happened. The US and the European Union have both set targets and created generous financial incentives for the use of biofuels. The results have been a disaster for people and the planet.
Already, 40% of US com(maize)production is used to feed cars. The proportion will rise this year as a result of the smaller harvest.
Though the market for biodicsel(生物柴油)is largely confined to the European Union, it has already captured 7% of the world’s output of vegetable oil. The European commission admits that its target(10% of transport fuels by 2020)will raise world cereal prices by between 3% and 6% . Oxfam estimates that with every 1% increase in the price of food, another 16 million people go hungry.
By 2021, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development says that 14% of the world’s maize and other coarse grains ,16% of its vegetable oil and 34% of its sugarcane will be used to make people in the gas-guzzling(大量消耗的)nations feel better about themselves. The demand for biofuel will be met, it reports, partly through an increase in production; partly through a " reduction in human consumption". The poor will starve so that the rich can drive.
The rich world’s demand for biofuels is already causing a global land grab. ActionAid estimates that European companies have now seized 5 m hectares of farmland—an area the size of Denmark—in developing countries for industrial biofuel production. Small farmers, growing food for themselves and local markets, have been thrown off their land and deprived. Tropical forests, savannahs(南美大草原)and grasslands have been cleared to plant what the industry still calls "green fuels".
When the impacts of land clearance and the use of nitrogen fertilisers are taken into account, biofuels produce more greenhouse gases than fossil fuels do. The UK, which claims that half the biofuel sold here meets its sustainability criteria, solves this problem by excluding the greenhouse gas emissions caused by changes in land use. Its sustainability criteria are, as a result, worthless.
Even second-generation biofuels are an environmental disaster, either extending the cultivated area or removing the straw and stovers(干草)which protect the soil from erosion and keep carbon and nutrients in the ground. The combination of first- and second-generation biofuels—encouraging fanners to plough up grasslands and to leave the soil bare—and hot summers could create the perfect conditions for a new dust bowl.
Our government knows all this. One of its own studies shows that if the European Union stopped producing biofuels, the amount of vegetable oils it exported to world markets would rise by 20% and the amount of wheat by 33% , reducing world prices.
Preparing for the prime minister’s hunger summit on Sunday, the international development department argued that, with a rising population, " the food production system will need to be radically improved, not just to produce more food but to produce it sustainably and fairly to ensure that the poorest people have the access to food that they need". But another government department—transport—boasts on its website that, thanks to its policies, drivers in this country have now used 4. 4bn litres(升)of biofuel.
Of this 30% was produced from recycled cooking oil. The rest consists of 3bn litres of refined energy snatched from the mouths of the people that Cameron claims to be helping.
Some of those to whom the government is now extending its "nutrition interventions" may have been starved by its own policies. In this and other ways, David Cameron, with the support of various sporting heroes, is offering charity, not justice. And that is no basis for liberating the poor.
The droughts in the Sahel and the US crop failures may result from______.
选项
A、use of fossil fuels
B、space studies and experiments
C、extremely hot summers
D、climate change
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Q227777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Sheassignedpeopletodothisreport.B、Shemadeinvestigationsinthe700schools.C、Shesupportedthereport.D、Shewrotet
A、It’stoowindy.B、Thepeoplethereareterrible.C、Theairispolluted.D、Thebeachesaredirty.C
PartⅡReadingComprehension(SkimmingandScanning)Directions:Inthispart,youwillhave15minutestogooverthepassageq
Mostpeoplewouldbe【C1】______bythehighqualityofmedicine【C2】______tomostAmericans.Thereisalotofspecialization,a
WhensoccerofficialsintheUnitedStateslearnedtheirnationwasselectedto【B1】______the1994worldCupfinals,theyreacte
Nowadays,incominggenerationsreallyrelynowonthepowerofthe"Internet"whenitcomestosearchingforinformation.Justt
CrowsareprobablythemostfrequentlymetandeasilyidentifiablemembersofthenativefaunaoftheUnitedStates.Thegreatn
CrowsareprobablythemostfrequentlymetandeasilyidentifiablemembersofthenativefaunaoftheUnitedStates.Thegreatn
随机试题
A.静脉尿路造影B.CTC.经皮肾穿刺造影D.尿道膀胱造影可以清晰显示肾裂伤程度,尿外渗范围的影像学检查是
A.代谢性酸中毒B.呼吸性酸中毒C.代谢性碱中毒D.呼吸性碱中毒E.无酸碱平衡紊乱实际碳酸氢盐(AB)=标准碳酸氢盐(SB)且<正常值,表明
克罗恩病临床表现个体差异不明显,多数起病隐匿、缓慢。
塔式起重机应安排在第31d(上班时刻)进场投入使用。塔式起重机在工作E与工作G之间没有闲置。
某二级公路有一批梁板采用先张法预制,在施工单位的施工组织设计中摘录了如下几个事项:事项1:多根钢筋同时张拉,并设定固定横梁和活动横粱,横梁须有足够的刚度,受力后挠度应符合规范要求。事项2:按设计要求进行张拉,即0→初应力→105%σ(持荷)→σK事件
论述新课程结构的均衡性、综合性和选择性体现的地方。
“注意”是有选择地指向和集中于一定对象或活动的心理状态。“注意”可按其产生和维持是否出于自觉的意图和努力而分为“有意注意”和“无意注意”。根据以上定义,下列关于同学们状态的描述属于“有意注意”的是()。
FortwocandidatesYourcompanyaresuedforillegalarbitragewithastockbrokerbyastockinvestor.Youhavebeenaskedtore
Whydomenbelievethattheyarebetterandclevererthanwomen?Because______.Beforetheinventionofagriculture,whatdi
UniversitiesBranchOutA)Asneverbeforeintheirlonghistory,universitieshavebecomeinstrumentsofnationalcompetitionas
最新回复
(
0
)