首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For years the media, food labels, dietitians, and even scientists who should know better have bombarded (轰炸) us with advice to l
For years the media, food labels, dietitians, and even scientists who should know better have bombarded (轰炸) us with advice to l
admin
2013-05-04
22
问题
For years the media, food labels, dietitians, and even scientists who should know better have bombarded (轰炸) us with advice to load up on antioxidants: compounds found mostly in fruits and vegetables that mop up free radicals, which are highly reactive clusters of atoms that have been fingered as the evil-doers responsible for aging and for illnesses from cancer to heart disease.
Not so fast. First, studies piled up showing that taking antioxidants—even such common and seemingly harmless ones as vitamins C and E—as supplements was not beneficial to health and might even be dangerous. Many of the free radicals that are neutralized by antioxidants perform valuable functions in the body. The most important:fighting toxins (毒素) and fighting cancer. Maybe it’s not such an excellent idea to flood the body with something that neutralizes these warriors of the immune system. Or as British chemist and science writer David Bradley noted in his blog,Reactive Reports,"It’s always struck: me as odd that you would want to absorb extra antioxidants anyway, given that oxidizing agents are at the front-line of immune defense against pathogens (病原体) and cancer cells...Suffice to say that taking antioxidant supplements... may not necessarily be good for your health if you already have health problems, especially cancer or an infection. "
The first hints that the trend was crashing came from the hundreds of studies that have tried to assess the health effects of antioxidant supplements. The results have not been pretty. In 2008 the Cochrane Collaboration, an international organization of scientists who assess medical research, carefully checked 67 studies with nearly 400,000 participants. The goal;to determine whether antioxidant supplements reduce mortality in either healthy people or in people with diseases. Conclusion:" We found no evidence to support antioxidant supplements for primary or secondary prevention, and Vitamin A and E may increase mortality. " In analyses of antioxidant supplements and Lou Gehrig’s disease, Alzheimer’s or mild cognitive impairment, and lung cancer, the Cochrane scientists’ verdict was the same: no. And each analysis had an alarming refrain about increasing overall mortality.
It’s not clear why antioxidants in supplement form might be so dangerous. One idea holds that at high doses they become pro-oxidants,stimulating the harmful DNA- and cell-damaging reactions they’re supposed to prevent. But a more likely explanation is that we are seeing the human version of what scientists are finding in studies of lab animals: antioxidants interfere with immune-system cells that fight infection and cancer.
The Cochrane Collaboration have found antioxidant supplements could______.
选项
A、reduce the mortality of unhealthy people
B、increase the overall mortality of people
C、reduce the overall mortality of people
D、reduce the mortality of healthy people
答案
B
解析
事实细节题。定位句指出在2008年,协作网仔细审查了包括将近400,000名参与者在内的67项研究,没有发现任何证据表明抗氧化物补充剂有主要或次要的预防作用,维他命A和E极有可能使死亡率更高。因此,B)“增加人们的死亡率”,符合题意,故为本题答案。A)“减少不健康人群的死亡率”与原文意思相反,故排除;C)“减少人们的死亡率”与原文中的Vitamin A and E may increase mortality意思相反,故排除;D)“减少健康人群的死亡率”,协作网的研究是针对健康人群和非健康人群两大群体的,得出的结果也是关于这两大群体的,该选项与原文increase mortality相反,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/QDB7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
TheShyArchitect:RatanTataCastingaboutforsomeonetorunabigfamilyfirmwhenasuccessfultyrantisduetoretirei
A、Menwerealwaysabletocontroltheirdesiresforfavoritefoods.B、Womencouldn’tcontroltheiremotionforfavoritefoods.C
A、Hehasopenedanewaccount.B、Something’swrongwithhisaccount.C、Hebegantopayacarloan.D、Hehadtodealwithafinan
A、Peopledon’tlikethecolorofthetrashcans.B、Notenoughpeoplevolunteertosortthetrash.C、Collectionsdon’tgetenough
Twoyearsagothismonth,Doubledaypublishedahistoricalthrillerwithanannouncedfirstprintingof85,000andhighhopesth
A、Helosteverythingincludinghiscomputer.B、Hesufferedfromaseriouscaraccident.C、Hewentabroadtojoinhisfamily.D、H
Healthfoodisageneraltermappliedtoallkindsoffoodsthatareconsideredmorehealthfulthanthetypesoffoodswidelyso
Healthfoodisageneraltermappliedtoallkindsoffoodsthatareconsideredmorehealthfulthanthetypesoffoodswidelyso
A、Toestimatetheextremeweather.B、Todevelopthesatellitetechnology.C、Toimproveagriculturaloutput.D、Tolearnhowtoch
随机试题
经皮肾镜取石的适应证不包括
图示等截面梁正确的M图是()。
在以下关于规划制定原则的描述中,哪些描述是正确的?()
下列说法正确的是()。
根据《工程造价咨询企业管理办法》,工程造价咨询企业可被处l万元以上3万元以下罚款的情形是()。
中国公民李某2015年12月取得全年一次性奖金36000元,当月另取得工资收入3000元,李某当月应计算缴纳的个人所得税为()元。
一、注意事项 1.申论考试,与传统作文考试不同,是对分析驾驭材料的能力、解决问题能力、语言表达能力的测试。 2.作答参考时限:阅读材料40分钟,作答110分钟。 3.仔细阅读给定的材料,按照后面提出的“申论要求”依次作答。二、给定材料
老规矩有老规矩的好处。还拿吃饭为例,一个从小到大都在餐桌上守规矩的人,一定擅长自我克制,一定懂得尊重他人。最重要的是,他将来进入其他文化环境以后,也一定能遵守异乡他国完全不同的另一套规矩。为什么?因为仪式是可以改变一个人的,居移气,养移体,看似琐碎无聊的老
宣传(中山大学2019年研;吉林大学2018年研;复旦大学2016、2012年研;华东师大2016年研;华南理工2015年研;人大2008年研;中青政2008年研;中南财大2007年研)
FromthebeginningoftheRepublic,Americanshaveenjoyedaccusingthefirstmagistrateofkinglyambition.Sometimesseriously
最新回复
(
0
)