首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A、To tell people the right time to take notes. B、To help people learn the better way to take notes. C、To study how many words st
A、To tell people the right time to take notes. B、To help people learn the better way to take notes. C、To study how many words st
admin
2016-03-29
79
问题
It’s a fact: Most students can type faster than they can write. So it’s only logical that typing notes on a laptop would be better when listening to a fast-paced lecture or presentation than laboriously writing them on a yellow legal pad, right? Well,(23)it may be logical, but it turns out to be wrong. In a recent series of studies, psychologists Mueller and Oppenheimer compared the performance of students who were asked to write out their notes on paper or to type them on a laptop. The results were stunning: Consistently across all measures, those who wrote out their notes longhand outperformed those who typed them on their laptops. In all cases, students who used laptops took more notes, but their notes were essentially rote transcriptions of the lectures. The information seemed to go from the lecturer to the computer with the student serving as a go-between rather than a learner.(24)In contrast, the notes taken by those writing longhand showed stronger conceptual understanding. Even more surprising, when students were allowed to study their notes before a test a week later, those whose notes were in longhand scored higher across the board. Why is the difference?(25)Mueller and Oppenheimer attribute the results to the differences in the types of cognitive processing that are triggered by slow writing and rapid typing. Because writing by hand is slower, students can’t possibly write down everything they hear. So they take the time to carefully listen, digest, and summarize the material in real time during the lecture. They learn while they listen. Because typing is rapid, students focus on simply getting all the words on paper without actually thinking about what they are typing.
23. What is the purpose of the study?
24. What can we learn about the two types of note-taking?
25. What leads to the difference between the results of the two types of note-taking?
选项
A、To tell people the right time to take notes.
B、To help people learn the better way to take notes.
C、To study how many words students can type per minute.
D、To train students’ computer-related skills.
答案
B
解析
推理判断题。本题问的是此项调查的目的是什么。短文开头提到,大多数学生打字都比写字要快,所以可以由此得出一个合乎逻辑的结论:在听一个快节奏的演讲或展示时,在笔记本电脑上记笔记要比费劲地在便签纸上记笔记好的多。这个结论可能合乎逻辑,但结果却证明是错误的,最近一系列由Mueller和Oppenheimer所做的研究却得出了相反的结论。由此可知,研究帮助人们了解了哪种方法是记笔记的好方法。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/QHL7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Peoplewhodon’tunderstandwhattheiremployersexpectthemtodomaybeheadedforoneofthemostcommonandyetmostavoidab
Peoplewhodon’tunderstandwhattheiremployersexpectthemtodomaybeheadedforoneofthemostcommonandyetmostavoidab
Since2007,theAmericanPsychologicalAssociation(APA)hasconductedasurveyofdifferentaspectsofstressinAmerica.Thisye
A、It’sdull.B、It’sexciting.C、It’ssimple.D、It’scomplicated.C关键是听懂女士话中的比较结构alotlesscomplicatedthanlifeinthecity“乡村的
AlcoholPricing:MulledWhines[A]BydaytouristsflocktoPlazadeEspaaincentralMadridtosnapphotosbesidethesculpture
A、Theythinkthatitisasymbolofmature.B、Theythinkthatsmokingwilleasetheirstressedlife.C、Theythinkthatsmokingl
TherootofthegingerplantiswellknownforitsuseasacookingspiceinChina,JapanandSouthernAsia.Itwasdescribedby
TherootofthegingerplantiswellknownforitsuseasacookingspiceinChina,JapanandSouthernAsia.Itwasdescribedby
Excitingnewresearchindicatesthatgrowingoldermightnotnecessarilymeangrowingmentallyslower.Newstudiesareproviding
随机试题
Ifhehadnotbeenhurt______much,he’dneverresignfromoffice.
下列关于腹部损伤的描述正确的是
A、IVU检查B、肾动脉造影检查C、B超检查D、放射性核素扫描检查E、CT检查尿外渗时,应采取的检查是()
依据《城市房地产管理法》的规定,下列机构中()属于房地产中介服务机构。
二手房买卖成交正式签订成交合同后,经纪企业应协助客户办妥房产()手续。
房屋所有权人按照有关登记办法的规定,向房屋所在地的()申请产权登记。
()负责期货投资者保障基金业务监管,对保障基金的筹集、管理和使用等情况进行定期核查。
美国经济学家阿尔文.汉森于20世纪40年代提出()。
某知名手机生产企业,为满足年轻人的市场需求,不断研发新品种,开发适合年轻人的手机,走集中战略道路。2015年该企业在市场调研的基础上,推出一款专门针对年轻人的手机。生产该手机的固定成本为3000万元,单位变动成本为1500元,产品售价为3000元/部。
曾有媒体报道,某大学将五十四名正副教授“正式解聘”,并对这一所谓教授“下课”事件欢欣鼓舞,理由是我国实质上的“终身教授”制度形同大锅饭,一来“导致高校冗员众多”,二来致使教授不思进取。抑制竞争和创新。以下哪项为真,能有力地对上述措施提出质疑?
最新回复
(
0
)