首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish govern
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish govern
admin
2016-06-02
21
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as nanny-state social engineering gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity(肥胖症)rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic(慢性的)disease?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of rich and poor. Because its level of income disparity(差异)is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor that in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases.
What was the aim of the major tax overhaul of Denmark in 2009?
选项
A、Decreasing the chronic disease rate.
B、Softening the shock of the global economic crisis.
C、Prohibiting the production of unhealthy food.
D、Changing medical conditions.
答案
B
解析
由题干中的aim,the major tax,Denmark in 2009定位到第三段第二句。该句指出,2009年丹麦政府宣布进行税收制度的全面改革,旨在缓解全球经济危机带来的打击、鼓励使用再生能源、保护环境、减缓气候变化并改善人们的健康状况,由此看出B)最符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/QW5K777K
本试题收录于:
浙江省大学英语三级题库大学英语三级分类
0
浙江省大学英语三级
大学英语三级
相关试题推荐
Duringtheeighteenyearsofthiscareer,FranceBattiatehaswonthe___________ofawideaudienceoutsideItaly.
Youngadults________olderpeoplearemorelikelytopreferonlineshopping.
Harryfirstbecameinterestedinadventuretravelbecausehisfather________.
Translatorsarepeoplewhoreadbooksforus.TolstoywroteinRussian,sosomeonemustreadhimforusandthenwritedownthat
Lisathinksonecanenjoyaholidaywithoutspendingalot.
Yourmothersentyouaparcel.Buttwomonthslateryoustillhaven’treceivedit.Writealettertothepostofficetoaskthe
Namedafteranex-GovernorofNewSouthWales,SydneyistheState’scapitalcity.Locatedonthesouth-eastcoastofAustralia
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthesenseoftrust.Aswithotherpersonalitycomponent
______touchinginHenry’sstoriesisthegallantrywithwhichordinarypeoplestruggletomaintaintheirdignity.
____,theleavesareturninggreen.
随机试题
政策规划主体的特点是
企业购并的含义和方式有哪些?
女,42岁,心悸、失眠多年,脾气急,有时出汗多。查体:无突眼,甲状腺不大,未闻及血管杂音,无震颤。心率92次/分,律整,肺、腹(-);手指及舌伸出呈粗大震颤;甲状腺131I摄取率:3小时29%,24小时45%;T4120nmol/L(正常65~169),
下列情况属于发热的是()。
甲公司工人乙某骑共享单车下班途中,因车座不舒服停在路边弯腰调整车座,正在倒车的小卡车将乙某碰倒碾压,造成其脾脏破裂。丙交警队认定在这起交通事故中乙某不承担主要责任。乙某从丁医院伤好出院后,提出工伤认定,甲公司不认为是工伤。根据《工伤保险条例》,在工伤认定中
建设工程设备采购合同专用合同条款约定买方对合同设备进行监造的,买方监造人员对合同设备的监造,()对合同设备质量的确认。
某施工合同中安全防护、文明施工措施费用为100万元,而施工单位仅投人了70万,剩下的费用挪作他用,建设主管部门发现后责令其改正,同时可以对其处以()罚款。
公司以没有明确市场价格的质押股权进行质押的,应当在()中选择较低者为质押品的公允价值。
一个进程获得了除CPU以外的所有资源,则该进程可能处于()状态。
关于计算机病毒的传播途径,不正确的说法是
最新回复
(
0
)