首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Quantitative Research in Education Many education researchers used to work on the assumption that children experience differ
Quantitative Research in Education Many education researchers used to work on the assumption that children experience differ
admin
2022-01-29
61
问题
Quantitative Research in Education
Many education researchers used to work on the assumption that children experience different phases of development, and that they cannot execute the most advanced level of cognitive operation until they have reached the most advanced forms of cognitive process. For example, one researcher Piaget had a well-known experiment in which he asked the children to compare the amount of liquid in containers with different shapes. Those containers had the same capacity, but even when the young children were demonstrated that the same amount of fluid could be poured between the containers, many of them still believed one was larger than the other. Piaget concluded that the children were incapable of performing the logical task in figuring out that the two containers were the same size even though they had different shapes, because their cognitive development had not reached the necessary phase. Critics on his work, such as Donaldson, have questioned this interpretation. They point out the possibility that the children were just unwilling to play the experimenter’s game, or that they did not quite understand the question asked by the experimenter. These criticisms surely do state the facts, but more importantly, it suggests that experiments are social situations where interpersonal interactions take place. The implication here is that Piaget’s investigation and his attempts to replicate it are not solely about measuring the children’s capabilities of logical thinking, but also the degree to which they could understand the directions for them, their willingness to comply with these requirements, how well the experimenters did in communicating the requirements and in motivating those children, etc.
The same kinds of criticisms have been targeted to psychological and educational tests. For instance, Mehan argues that the subjects might interpret the test questions in a way different from that meant by the experimenter. In a language development test, researchers show children a picture of a medieval fortress, complete with moat, drawbridge, parapets and three initial consonants in it: D, C, and G. The children are required to circle the correct initial consonant for ’castle’. The answer is C, but many kids choose D. When asked what the name of the building was, the children responded ’Disneyland’. They adopted the reasoning line expected by the experimenter but got to the wrong substantive answer. The score sheet with the wrong answers does not include in it a child’s lack of reasoning capacity; it only records that the children gave a different answer rather than the one the tester expected.
Here we are constantly getting questions about how valid the measures are where the findings of the quantitative research are usually based. Some scholars such as Donaldson consider these as technical issues, which can be resolved through more rigorous experimentation. In contrast, others like Mehan reckon that the problems are not merely with particular experiments or tests, but they might legitimately jeopardise the validity of all researches of this type.
Meanwhile, there are also questions regarding the assumption in the logic of quantitative educational research that causes can be identified through physical and/or statistical manipulation of the variables. Critics argue that this does not take into consideration the nature of human social life by assuming it to be made up of static, mechanical causal relationships, while in reality, it includes complicated procedures of interpretation and negotiation, which do not come with determinate results. From this perspective, it is not clear that we can understand the pattern and mechanism behind people’s behaviours simply in terms of the casual relationships, which are the focuses of quantitative research. It is implied that social life is much more contextually variable and complex.
Such criticisms of quantitative educational research have also inspired more and more educational researchers to adopt qualitative methodologies during the last three or four decades. These researchers have steered away from measuring and manipulating variables experimentally or statistically. There are many forms of qualitative research, which is loosely illustrated by terms like ’ethnography’, ’case study’, ’participant observation’, ’life history’, ’unstructured interviewing’, ’discourse analysis’ and so on. Generally speaking, though, it has characteristics as follows:
Qualitative researches have an intensive focus on exploring the nature of certain phenomena in the field of education, instead of setting out to test hypotheses about them. It also inclines to deal with ’unstructured data’, which refers to the kind of data that have not been coded during the collection process regarding a closed set of analytical categories. As a result, when engaging in observation, qualitative researchers use audio or video devices to record what happens or write in detail open-ended field-notes, instead of coding behaviour concerning a pre-determined set of categories, which is what quantitative researchers typically would do when conducting ’systematic observation’. Similarly, in an interview, interviewers will ask open-ended questions instead of ones that require specific predefined answers of the kind typical, like in a postal questionnaire. Actually, qualitative interviews are often designed to resemble casual conversations.
The primary forms of data analysis include verbal description and explanations and involve explicit interpretations of both the meanings and functions of human behaviours. At most, quantification and statistical analysis only play a subordinate role. The sociology of education and evaluation studies were the two areas of educational research where criticism of quantitative research and the development of qualitative methodologies initially emerged in the most intense way. A series of studies conducted by Lacey, Hargreaves and Lambert in a boys’ grammar school, a boys’ secondary modern school, and a girls’ grammar school in Britain in the 1960s marked the beginning of the trend towards qualitative research in the sociology of education. Researchers employed an ethnographic or participant observation approach, although they did also collect some quantitative data, for instance on friendship patterns among the students. These researchers observed lessons, interviewed both the teachers and the students, and made the most of school records. They studied the schools for a considerable amount of time and spent plenty of months gathering data and tracking changes over all these years.
Look at the following statements or descriptions (Questions 28-32) and the list of people below.
Match each statement or description with the correct person or people, A, B, C or D
Write the correct letter, A, B, C or D, in boxes on your answer sheet.
NB You may use any letter more than once.
List of People
A. Piaget
B. Mehan
C. Donaldson
D. Lacey, Hargreaves and Lambert
Logical reasoning involving in the experiment is beyond children’s cognitive development.
选项
答案
A
解析
实验所包含的逻辑推理超出了孩子认知能力的发展。关键词logical reasoning、 beyond children’s cognitive development。A项Piaget出现于原文第1段。首先提到他做了一个非常著名的实验,要求孩子去比较不同形状容器中液体的体积,在下面的实验结论中提到:Piaget concluded that the children were incapable of performing the logical task in figuring out that the two containers were the same size even though they had different shapes;this was since their cognitive development had not reached the necessary phase.孩子们无法明白两个容器容量相同,是因为他们认知能力的发展没有达到实验需要的水平。其中cognitive development had not reached the necessary phase对应beyond children’s cognitive development。因此,本题的正确答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/R6AO777K
本试题收录于:
雅思阅读题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思阅读
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
Forgenerations,NativeAmericansusedmythsandlegendstoexplainthemysteriousworldaroundthem.Onesuchetiologicalmyth
Thejudge’sstandinginthelegalcommunity,thoughshakenbyphonyallegationsofwrongdoing,emerged,atlonglast,______.
Newspapersreportthattheformerexecutivehasbeentryingtokeepalowprofilesincehis______exitfromthecompany.
Inarecentstudy,DavidCressyexaminestwocentralquestionsconcerningEnglishimmigrationtoNewEnglandinthe1630s:what
Thispassageisadaptedfrommaterialpublishedin2001.FrederickDouglasswasunquestionablythemostfamousAfricanAmerican
Scientistsformerlybelievedthattherockyplanets—Earth,Mercury,Venus,andMars—werecreatedbytherapidgravitationalcoll
InNovember1753,theBritishauthorSarahFieldingacceptedhalfthepaymentforhernovelTheCryandaskedthattheotherhal
Thispassageisadaptedfrommaterialpublishedin2001.In1998scientistsusingtheneutrinodetectorinKamioka,Japan,were
Indireneedof______,thetravelersfortifiedthemselveswithfoodanddrinkinordertocompletetheirjourney.
Eventhoughtheytendedtobe(i)____strangers,fifteenth-centuryEuropeansdidnotautomaticallyassociate(ii)____anddanger
随机试题
正常心脏后前位不易观察到的是
右下腹疼痛拒按,或右足屈而不伸,伸则痛甚,甚则局部肿痞,或时时发热,自汗恶寒,舌苔薄腻而黄,脉滑数。方剂选用
气雾剂的优点有()。
《建设工程安全生产管理条例》制定的基本法律依据包括()。
若企业不打算享受现金折扣优惠,则应尽量推迟付款的时间。()
如果会计师事务所非审计项目组成员的主要近亲属,通过继承从审计客户获得直接经济利益,则()。
《与朱元思书》是八年级下册第五单元的一篇课文,如果让你给八年级的学生执教这篇课文,你会怎么做呢?请按要求完成后面的题目:附:《与朱元思书》课文与朱元思书①
缺陷补偿,是指个体在充当社会角色时不可能事事成功,当自我角色目标失败时,常常可能会对相关的社会角色的重要性做重新评价,从而进行自我定义以补偿自己角色缺陷。根据上述定义,下列属于缺陷补偿的是()。
求|cos(x+y)|dxdy,其中D={(x,y)|
A、Assoonasshestarteduniversity.B、Aftershedidsomeresearch.C、Aftershetookaliteraturecourse.D、Whenshemetagood
最新回复
(
0
)