首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as
admin
2012-04-23
44
问题
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug.
If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as the debate over health-care reform exploded, this is the season of "17.5k dead women a year. " That’s the body count scaremongers are predicting if the Food and Drug Administration rescinds its provisional approval of the drug Avastin for metastatic breast cancer, a decision expected by year’s end. Although the move has nothing to do with the new health-care law, uncertainty about "Obama-care" has given opponents an opening to terrify people about what’s coming—like bureaucrats rationing health care to save money.
The reality is far different and, for those who care more about helping cancer patients than about scoring political points, much sadder. That’s because in 2008, when the FDA gave "fast track" approval for Avastin in breast cancer that has metastasized—usually to the lungs, bones, liver, or brain—it was conditional on the manufacturer, Genentech, running additional clinical trials of the drug’s safety and efficacy. There was good reason for that. Avastin is an angiogenesis inhibitor, a class of cancer drugs that have not lived up to their hype: although they stop one mechanism by which malignant cells grow blood vessels to sustain them, the cells often activate a different mechanism and go on proliferating.
Although Avastin does extend the lives of patients with metastatic colorectal and kidney cancer, and remains FDA-approved for those uses, the new studies show it does not work the same miracle against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Instead, Avastin increased what’s called progression-free survival (how long before cancer spreads or grows) by about one to three weeks, depending on which chemo agent it was paired with. But it did not keep women alive any longer than chemo alone. To some advocates, progression-free survival without an increase in overall survival is still welcome, since it suggests patients have a better quality of life during their last months.
But it’s hard to make that case for Avastin. Not only did it not keep women alive, but it also caused hypertension, hemorrhaging, bowel perforations, and other side effects. "It seems as if the drug’s toxicity cancels out any benefit," cancer surgeon David Gorski of the Karmanos Cancer Institute told me. Perforated bowels do not equal a better quality of life.
These dismal results are what led an FDA panel to vote 12—1 in July to rescind the conditional approval of Avastin for MBC. Critics of health-care reform, predictably, saw nefarious motives—in particular, evidence that Obamacare will ration expensive drugs. (Avastin costs some $88,000 a year, though few patients live that long. ) The Wall Street Journal editorialized about the "Avastin mugging," and Sen. David Vitter accused the FDA of "assigning a value to a day of a person’s life. "
If Avastin did extend lives for, let’s say, $10,000 a day, Vitter might have a case. But it doesn’t extend life at all. That makes allegations like the 17,500 dead women (from a right-wing blog) "utter demagoguery of the most vile and despicable sort," Gorski wrote on the blog Science-Based Medicine.
There are stories galore of women with metastatic breast cancer who are alive "because of Avastin. " Indeed, patients have been flooding the airwaves and blogosphere with claims that Avastin helped them. But the only way to tell whether Avastin deserves the credit for keeping patients alive is through large studies. "There are always patients who live longer than average," biostatistician Donald Berry of the MD? Anderson Cancer Center told me. "They attribute it to the treatment; people love to make attributions. " But when the proportion of patients alive at any given time in a study is the same whether they are receiving Avastin or not—as the two large trials found—then crediting Avastin is "very likely wrong. " That some women did live longer on Avastin, Berry explained, "may simply reflect the natural heterogeneity of the disease and say nothing about the therapy. "
Doctors can keep prescribing Avastin for metastatic breast cancer off-label, though insurers will not pay for it. Some activists welcome that. There is "no evidence of clinical benefit from Avastin, yet there is harm," says Fran Visco, president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition. "We need to demand more of treatment before we unleash it on the public. " Science-based medicine isn’t always pretty. But it’s better than politics-based medicine, which is what some critics of the Avastin decision are practicing—and much better than deluding ourselves into thinking something works when it doesn’t.
Which of the following is NOT the benefit of Avastin?
选项
A、It can help malignant cells grow blood vessels to sustain them.
B、It can extend the lives of patients with metastatic colorectal and kidney cancer.
C、It can extend the lives of patients with breast cancer.
D、It can help patients have a better quality of life during their last months.
答案
C
解析
首先,要看清题目,找出不正确的选项。所给的三个选项A、C和D分别可从第三段和第四段中得出均为正确的答案,而阿瓦斯丁不能延长乳腺癌病人的生命。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/RGiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、Theyfiredbullets.B、Theydamagedcars.C、Theysetfire.D、Theyattackedrestaurants.A
Ascollegeseniorshurtleintothejobhunt,littlefibsontheresume--forexample,claimingsdegreewhenthey’rethreecredit
WaitingforGodotwaswrittenby______.
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestwaveofmergersandacquisitionseverwitnessed.TheprocesssweepsfromhyperactiveAmer
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestwaveofmergersandacquisitionseverwitnessed.TheprocesssweepsfromhyperactiveAmer
Universitiesarenolongerrelativelyemptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmove,eventothemostunl
A、FatahPartyintendedtoirritatethemilitantgroupHomos.B、FatahPartywantedtostrengthenthelegislativepower.C、FatahP
Backin2000,inspiredbyadesiretohelpthoseinneed,MeganandDennisDoyleofMinneapolisdecidedtheywantedtodomoret
WhenLewisZiskawantedtoseehowawarmerwoodwithmorecarbondioxideintheairwouldaffectcertainplants,hedidn’tset
What’shappening?
随机试题
铲斗挖泥船的中型容量铲斗适用于()。
柴可夫斯基的代表作之一是 ()
28岁一男性,自觉前尿道有轻度痒感,排尿微痛,尿道分泌物稀薄、有黏液性或黏脓性,经诊断为非淋菌性尿道炎,可选用的抗菌药物有
麻醉前最常用的催眠药物是()。
甲乙两国于1996年签订投资保护条约,该条约至今有效。2004年甲国政府依本国立法机构于2003年通过的一项法律,取消了乙国公民在甲国的某些投资优惠,而这些优惠恰恰是甲国按照前述条约应给予乙国公民的。针对甲国的上述作法,根据国际法的有关规则,下列哪一项判
平屋面的涂膜防水构造有正置式和倒置式之分,所谓正置式的是指()。【2014年真题】
根据企业所得税相关规定,下列关于企业所得来源地的说法中,正确的有()。
市场机制才是资源配置最有效的手段,让更多资源流向养老市场只能靠市场。从国外经验观察,完全依靠政府财力实现全民养老是几乎不可能完成的。作为具有一定公益性质的准公共产品,养老服务虽不能全部市场化,但完全可以在明确公办养老机构“保基本、兜底线”职能定位的同时,健
火车驶过长900米的铁路桥,从车头上桥到车尾离桥共用1分25秒,紧接着列车又穿过一条长1800米的隧道,从车头进隧道到车尾离开隧道用了2分40秒,则火车车身长为()。
Readthethearticlebelowabouthoteltheft.ChoosethebestwordtofilleachgapfromA,B,CorD.Foreachquestion(19-33)
最新回复
(
0
)