首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
admin
2013-04-25
45
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family, cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age persen. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:
(a) get a job and work until they die;
(b) apply for public assistance (you have to be destitute to apply); or
(c) starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.(A)But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
The author thinks that if the bill becomes law, its effect would be ______.
选项
A、indirect
B、unnoticed
C、apparent
D、straightforward
答案
A
解析
本题仍为事实信息题。题目问:作者认为如果该提案成为法律,它的效果会是什么?短文中第十段最后一句说:“If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.”在接下来的几段里,作者讲到赡养父母是个人的责任,并非社会的责任。而有些人碍于情面,不得不重新考虑赡养父母的问题。因此该提案起到了间接的作用,故选项A为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ROyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
CompletethenotesonthepoliceusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachgap.•don’tbeaggressive•donottrytobribepolice
Theprofessorwantsthestudentstopretendthattheyare______.
Questions7-10Completethefollowingtableofinformationaboutthewalks.
Questions28-30DecidewhichTHREEofthefollowingstatementsaretrue,accordingtothespeakers,andwritetheappropriatele
Questions26-27Completetheformulaforsafemaximumheartrate.26.______-age—restingheartrate×27.______+restingheartra
SECTION1Questions1-10Questions1-3
Questions26-30CompletethefollowingsentencesusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Whereisthestudentfrom?Whydoesthisproblemexist?
CompletethenotesbelowbywritingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSinthespacesprovided.TheGovernmentplanstogive【T14】$______to
随机试题
若完成某分项工程需要某种材料的净耗量为0.95t,损耗率为5%,那么,必需消耗量为()t。
新加坡公民王颖与顺捷国际信托公司在北京签订协议,将其在中国的财产交由该公司管理,并指定受益人为其幼子李力。在管理信托财产的过程中,王颖与顺捷公司发生纠纷,并诉至某人民法院。关于该信托纠纷的法律适用,下列哪些选项是正确的?(2017年卷一77题,多选)
甲部门是一个利润中心。下列财务指标中,最适合用来评价该部门对公司利润和管理费用贡献的是()。
2012年5月1日,赵某在回家路上被人用木棍从背后击伤;经过调查,赵某于2012年8月1日掌握确切证据证明将其打伤的是钱某,但忙于事务一直未向钱某主张权利;2013年1月1日,赵某因出差遇险无法行使请求权的时间为2个月。赵某请求人民法院保护其权利的诉讼时效
下列不符合旅游合同客体所指的“物”的条件的是()
Windows操作系统通过()来判断文件是不是一个可执行文件。
在计算机语言中有一种逻辑运算,如果两个数同一位止都是0时,其和为零;一个为0、一个为1时或两个都是1时,其和为1。那么,()。
被评估机组为5年前购置,账面价值20万元人民币,评估时该机组已不再生产了,已经被新型机组所取代。经调查和咨询了解到,在评估基准日,其他企业购置新型机组的取得价格为300万元人民币,专家认定被评估机组与新型机组的功能比为0.7,被评估机组尚可使用5年,预计
A、 B、 C、 D、 C
Foralongtime,researchershavetriedtonaildownjustwhatshapesus—orwhat,atleast,shapesusmost.Andovertheyears,
最新回复
(
0
)