首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
admin
2013-04-25
54
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family, cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age persen. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:
(a) get a job and work until they die;
(b) apply for public assistance (you have to be destitute to apply); or
(c) starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.(A)But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
The author thinks that if the bill becomes law, its effect would be ______.
选项
A、indirect
B、unnoticed
C、apparent
D、straightforward
答案
A
解析
本题仍为事实信息题。题目问:作者认为如果该提案成为法律,它的效果会是什么?短文中第十段最后一句说:“If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.”在接下来的几段里,作者讲到赡养父母是个人的责任,并非社会的责任。而有些人碍于情面,不得不重新考虑赡养父母的问题。因此该提案起到了间接的作用,故选项A为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ROyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Questions34-36CompletethefollowingnotesonthestagesofreversecultureshockusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachgap.
SECTION4Questions31-40Questions31-33CompletethefollowingnotesondifferencesyoumightnoticewhenyougohomeusingNO
SECTION2Questions11-20Questions11-13CompletethefollowinginformationusingONEwordforeachgap.Thespeakerrecommends
SECTION2Questions11-20Questions11-13CompletethefollowinginformationusingONEwordforeachgap.Thespeakerrecommends
SECTION1Questions1-10Questions1-3
Completethesummarybelow.UseNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.PROJECTMANAGENTLastweek’sdefinitionofpro
TheproblemthatConstableGraydescribesis
ChooseyouranswersfromtheboxandwritethelettersA-Hnexttoquestions26-30.SharonandLesterhavedifferent(26)
Completethesentencesbelow.WriteONEWORDAND/ORANUMBERforeachanswer.MountRushmoreIttook______yearstofinishthep
Completethesentencesbelow.WriteONEWORDAND/ORANUMBERforeachanswer.MountRushmoreThegovernmentfinallypaid$_____
随机试题
按文件中的数据存放格式,可以把磁盘文件分为________和________。
体现“逆流挽舟”法的方剂是( )
患者,男,8岁,血尿、少尿l周,伴有眼睑水肿、乏力、腰酸。血压187/105mmHg,既往无肾疾病史。少尿的病因常见于
下列急性化脓性根尖周炎的症状中,叙述错误的是
干式系统、预作用系统均对配水管道的充水时间有限制要求,规定充水时间的目的是()。
证券投资基金通过发行基金单位集中的资金,交由( )管理和运作。
旅游行政管理部门的质监所对导游服务质量进行监控的途径不包括()。
甲、乙两人在银行都有存款,已知甲有存款160元,若甲取出存款的75%,乙取出存款的1/3,则甲的余款是乙的一半,那么乙原来在银行存款()元。
马克思主义认识论与唯心主义认识论的区别在于是否承认()
WhatisMr.Bush’smainpurposeofthetrip?
最新回复
(
0
)