首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Community courts and community justice prevailed in England at the time of the Norman Conquest (1066). The legal system was ritu
Community courts and community justice prevailed in England at the time of the Norman Conquest (1066). The legal system was ritu
admin
2011-03-10
66
问题
Community courts and community justice prevailed in England at the time of the Norman Conquest (1066). The legal system was ritualistic, dependent upon oaths at most stages of litigation, and permeated by both religious and superstitious notions. The proceedings were oral, very personal, and highly confrontative. Juries were unknown. One party publicly "appealed," or accused, the other before the community meeting at which the presence of both was obligatory. To be absent meant risking fines and outlawry. After the preliminary statements of the parties, the court rendered judgment, not on the merits of the issue nor the question of guilt or innocence, but on the manner by which it should be resolved. Judgment in other words preceded trial because it was a decision on what form the trial should take. It might be by compurgation, by ordeal, or, after the Norman Conquest, by battle. Excepting trial by battle, only one party was tried or, more accurately, was put to his "proof." Proof being regarded as an advantage, it was usually awarded to the accused party; in effect he had the privilege of proving his own case.
Trial by compurgation consisted of a sworn statement to the truth of one’s claim or denial, supported by the oaths of a certain number of fellow swearers. Presumably they, no more than the claimant, would endanger their immortal souls by the sacrilege of false swearing. Originally the oath-helpers swore from their own knowledge to the truth of the party’s claim. Later they became little more than character witnesses, swearing only to their belief that his oath was trustworthy. If he rounded up the requisite number of compurgators and the cumbrous swearing in very exact form proceeded without a mistake, he won his case. A mistake "burst" the oath, proving guilt.
Ordeals were usually reserved for more serious crimes, for persons of bad reputation, for peasants, or for those caught with stolen goods. As an invocation of immediate divine judgment, ordeals were consecrated by the Church and shrouded with solemn religious mystery. The accused underwent a physical trial in which he called upon God to witness his innocence by putting a miraculous sign upon his body. Cold water, boiling water, and hot iron were the principal ordeals, all of which the clergy administered. In the ordeal of cold water, the accused was trussed up and cast into a pool to see whether he would sink or float. On the theory that water which had been sanctified by a priest would receive an innocent person but reject the guilty, innocence was proved by sinking -- and hopefully a quick retrieval -- guilt by floating. In the other ordeals, one had to plunge his hand into a cauldron of boiling water or carry a red hot piece of iron for a certain distance, in the hope that three days later, when the bandages were removed, the priest would find a "clean" wound, one that was healing free of infection~ How deeply one plunged his arm into the water, how heavy the iron or great the distance it was carried, depended mainly on the. gravity of the charge.
The Normans brought to England still another ordeal, trial by battle, paradigm of the adversary system, which gave to the legal concept of "defense" or "defendant" a physical meaning. Trial by battle was a savage yet sacred method of proof which was also thought to involve divine intercession on behalf of the righteous. Rather than let a wrongdoer triumph, God would presumably strengthen the arms of the party who had sworn truly to the justice of his cause. Right, not might, would therefore conquer. Trial by battle was originally available for the settlement of all disputes but eventually was restricted to cases of serious crime.
Whether one proved his case by compurgation, ordeal, or battle, the method was accusatory in character. There was always a definite and known accuser, some private person who brought formal suit and openly confronted his antagonist. There was never any secrecy in the proceedings, which were the same for criminal as for civil litigation. The judges, who had no role whatever in the making of the verdict, decided only which party should be put to proof and what its form should be; thereafter the judges merely enforced an observance of the rules. The oaths that saturated the proceedings called upon God to witness to the truth of the respective claims of the parties, or the justice of their cause, or the reliability of their word. No one gave testimonial evidence nor was anyone questioned to test his veracity.
According to the passage, an oath was declared "burst" during compurgation if the ______.
选项
A、swearer made an error in the exact form of the required ritual
B、swearer could not round up the required number of oath-helpers
C、swearer preferred trial by ordeal, or by battle
D、judges decided that the oath was false or unnecessary
答案
A
解析
此题为细节题。此题定位在第二段,答案在最后两句,“If he rounded up the requisite number of compurgators and the cumbrous swearing in very exact form proceeded without a mistake, he won his case. A mistake "burst" the oath, proving guilt.”据此我们可以判断出A为最佳答案。B为干扰项,C和D不是本题所解。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/RTYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Formostpeople,theideaofgivingapresentationtoagroupofpeopleisafateworsethandeath.Recentresearchhasshownth
WiltChamberlainisretirednow,butheusedtobeafamousbasketballplayer.Hehasset65differentrecordsandevenholdsma
Amongherfellowastronomers,VeraRubinisknownasanexpertobserverofthenightsky,oneofthebest.Herreputationderive
FredCookeofSalfordturned90twodaysagoandtheworldhasbeenbeatingapathtohisdoor.Ifyouhaven’tnoticed,theback
Awisemanoncesaidthattheonlythingnecessaryforthetriumphofevilisforgoodmentodonothing.So,asapoliceoffice
Yetthedifferenceintoneandlanguagemuststrikeus,assoonasitisphilosophythatspeaks:thatchangeshouldremindusth
A、EnglandB、IrelandC、ScotlandD、FranceC
我们这代人,和现在的年轻人不同,我们没有什么择业自主权。所以每一次,不管被派到哪里,我不会想别的,就想着怎么把工作做好,做得最好。也许我这种个性特点和我母亲的教导有关。母亲是个凡事要求尽善尽美的人,她不能原谅一件事没有做好。比如刷马桶,我使劲刷了几次还
Whatdistinguishesmorphologyfromsyntaxdealswiththerulesgoverningthecombinationof
A、starvationB、AIDSC、discriminationD、unemploymentB
随机试题
Wearedeeplyconcernedabouttherecentdevelopmentsoftheissueinthiscountry.
对于环境因素会产生特定反应的某些基因通常称为
患者,男,60岁。有心悸病史8年余,平素心悸气短,面色无华,倦怠乏力,纳呆食少,舌淡红,脉细弱。治疗应选用的方剂为
甲与乙交换房屋,房地产评估机构评估确定甲的房屋价值为34万元,乙的房屋价值为30万元,经协商,乙支付给甲差价款40000元,当地规定的契税税率为5%,则甲、乙应该缴纳的契税分别为()元。
在写字楼市场比较理想的情况下,写字楼市场租金和基础租金之间的关系一般是()
简述如何培养中小学生的情感。
1919年陈独秀在上海创办的《新青年》标志着新文化运动的兴起。()
2/3,8/9,4/3,2,()
如果研究者提出的问题是研究者本人确实希望了解的,但是并不符合研究现场的实际情况,或者当事人认为这个问题对他们来说并不重要,那么研究者应该修改或者摒弃这个问题。根据材料,下列各项说法中正确的是:
IfI(be)______you,Iwouldn’tworryaboutit.
最新回复
(
0
)