首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What America Won in the "War on Poverty"? A) In support of government action to ease the plight of the poor, President Obama
What America Won in the "War on Poverty"? A) In support of government action to ease the plight of the poor, President Obama
admin
2022-07-28
81
问题
What America Won in the "War on Poverty"?
A) In support of government action to ease the plight of the poor, President Obama commemorated the 50th anniversary of the War on Poverty with his own call for new policies to address the continued struggles of tens of millions of Americans.
B) In his official statement, Obama remarked that, "In the richest nation on earth, far too many children are still born into poverty, far too few have a fair shot to escape it, and Americans of all races and backgrounds experience wages and incomes that aren’t rising… That does not mean…abandoning the War on Poverty. In fact, if we hadn’t declared ’unconditional war on poverty in America,’ millions more Americans would be living in poverty today. Instead, it means we must redouble our efforts to make sure our economy works for every working American."
C) It would seem hard to argue with such sentiments, yet some have done so. Fox News published a piece saying "despite trillions spent, poverty won". Many others react by shaking their heads sadly, acknowledging the noble effort and concluding that it was an unfortunate failure. The implication is clear: government spent a mint and did not end poverty, and now Obama is calling for more of the same.
D) This raises two crucial questions: did the first "war" really fail? And what should we do today?
E) As for the first, when Lyndon Johnson called for an end to poverty on January 8, 1964, he continued the tradition of the New Deal and decades of American policy designed to provide all Americans with basic standards of living—housing, education, healthcare and jobs. Americans believed that an activist government could achieve those goals, hence the trillions of dollars directed at the War on Poverty.
F) Those trillions have over time reduced the official "poverty rate" from 19 percent to 15 percent. Many have concluded that such a minor shift wasn’t worth the massive expense. Johnson’s legacy was destroyed by the chaos unleashed by opposition to the Vietnam War and by the dilemma of the 1970s, and the Reagan revolution of the 1980s was predicated in part on a conviction that the government’s attempt to alleviate the plight of the poor was not only social engineering, but badly-done social engineering.
G) Yet poverty today is of a different order than poverty 50 or 100 years ago. During the Great Depression, millions of Americans were still without electricity or running water. By the 1960s that had changed, but many people still lacked basic healthcare, and the elderly were often at the mercy of their families. Today, there is still widespread poverty as defined by official income statistics, but the conditions of poverty are materially different.
H) In part, that is because of the safety net we have since created. Many conservatives believe that we were better off in a world where private charity groups and religious organizations provided assistance, rather than government programs such as food stamps, welfare, unemployment benefits, social security and disability payments. But while that world did place much greater stock in self-reliance, it also left far more people at a huge disadvantage, struggling for life’s basic necessities. You could— and some do—argue that such a world produced heartier souls more able to cope with life’s vicissitudes (变迁). You could also argue—and should—that such a world was harsh and destructive to many in ways that humans for centuries have strived to ameliorate (改善).
I) Today we have a massive social safety net, thanks to both the New Deal and the substantial expansion of federal and state programs beginning in the 1960s. These programs soon included housing as well. Many have seen more waste than not, and housing programs in particular did not fare well, as the scarred urban landscape of housing projects demonstrates.
J) But that safety net—much of which is not well-captured in the per capita income statistics that are used to assess the poverty rate—did create a set of expectations about the minimum level of necessities that all Americans deserve. That minimum— consisting of adequate shelter, food, heat and air conditioning, public education, and access to healthcare for the elderly—is a reality today.
K) The real criticism, however, and the area we should focus on in the years ahead, is that because Americans are divided about this safety net, we accomplish two things, neither of which are the best. We spend trillions on programs designed to provide some level of basic security, and yet these programs remain controversial. Significant opposition to these programs and the constant threat that they could be cut means that instead of providing security, they create insecurity, and because of that opposition, it becomes almost impossible to discuss how they could be improved, rather than maintained or terminated.
L) The result is something of a worst of all possible worlds: We maintain a vast safety net while pretending that we do not, and many of us act as if safety nets are at best ineffective and at worst immoral. The net result is that as a society, we find ourselves unable to enact needed reforms.
M) The answer, then, is to recognize that in securing many basic necessities, the War on Poverty succeeded, either in actually ensuring that those necessities exist, or in establishing that having them is a fundamental right. Even the most malicious opponents to social safety net programs accept that right, which would not have been the case well into the 20th century. The programs may not have altered the poverty rate, but in part that’s because we have constantly reset and raised the bar about what we consider to be the most basic resources that every American deserves. Our "enough" today is considerably greater than it was fifty years ago.
N) The next solutions to the challenges of today’s poverty, therefore, are not better public housing and Medicaid. We do not need the same approach that various administrations have been advocating for the past 50 years. We need instead a consensus about what we believe are the next level of basic material rights of every citizen—beyond food, clothing and shelter. Many of those—such as self-esteem, the tools to build careers, the ability to navigate a world defined by information rather than manufacturing—are within the ability of government to provide.
O) State and local governments have been laboratories of new initiatives—from work and training programs, to partnerships between local businesses and community colleges, to food banks. Thankfully, such initiatives at all levels of governments require less money than more traditional social services. They also demand more flexibility. Government programs defined not by ideology but by flexibility and the ability to help private and local institutions act—not by giving them grants as the War on Poverty did, but via tax incentives that help run programs—that would be welcome innovation, and the best way to continue the legacy of the War on Poverty. And with the federal government unlikely to spend more in today’s climate, it may also be the only way.
Some people think the War on Poverty is a failure, though they admit it is a moral effort.
选项
答案
C
解析
题干意为,有些人认为“向贫困宣战”是失败的,尽管他们承认它是件好事。根据题干中的关键词failure,admit和moral effort可定位到C段。该段第三句提到,许多其他人的反应是黯然摇头,虽然认同其难能可贵,但还是承认这是场失败。由此可知,题干是对原文的同义转述,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Rix7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Sellingdirecttothepublic.B、Sellingthroughtheirownchains.C、Sellingbyonlinestores.D、Sellingthroughsmallshops.C
A、Byharassingthem.B、Byappealingtothepublic.C、Bytakinglegalaction.D、Byresortingtoforce.A从选项预测本题询问的是通过何种途径实现某一目的。男
A、Thelongerournapis,themoreenergywewillget.B、A20-minutenapwillhelptorestoreourenergy.C、Ashort-timenapdoes
A、Delegationisatickettoforeigntrade.B、Managersshouldn’tmerelybea"doer".C、Leadershipisabornability.D、Delegation
A、10:30PM.B、11:00PM.C、11:30PM.D、12:00PM.D男士说,餐馆周末的营业时间一直到午夜,即12:00pm。故答案是D。关键是分辨weekdays和weekend的不同营业时间,做笔记时要迅速和完整地记下细节,例如:w
A、Europeancountriestendtosupporthavingnaps.B、Workingmenshouldhaveanapregularly.C、Adultsaremorelikelytodevelop
A、BecausetheEarthisheavilypollutedB、Becausenaturecannotrecycleitsresources.C、Becausemoreandmorepeopleliveonth
A、TakemedicinethatcantreatZika.B、Avoidtravelingforseveralmonths.C、Watchoutforthespreadingsituation.D、Trynotto
A、Researchasmanydifferentoptionsaspossible.B、Avoidgoingoverthesameoptionsrepeatedly.C、Focusonwhatispractical.
A、Thecostofgrowingtobaccoincreased.B、Manypeoplebegantogiveupsmoking.C、Thegovernmentbannedsmokingandcigarette.
随机试题
某市人民检察院对甲某的贪污案件进行了侦查,并逮捕了甲某。请回答下列问题。如果甲某还因为涉嫌巨额财产来源不明罪被起诉到人民法院,在法庭审判过程中,甲某认为根据刑事诉讼中的证明责任的分配规则,其不需要证明自己巨额财产来源的合法性,相反,应当由公诉方证明巨额
案情:严甲与周乙二人系邻居,且长期不睦,一日,因门口垃圾堆放又起争吵,继而相殴,因严甲体格较壮,周乙处于劣势,被按倒在地,恰周乙之弟周丙经过,看见哥哥被欺负,怒不可遏,遂前去帮手,周乙抽身回家随手拿了个木棍,朝严甲身上乱抡,严甲遂伤。经医院诊断,严甲肘骨骨
签约成交的形式有()。
关于砌体工程中不得设置脚手眼的说法中,正确的有()。
提出在学校中构筑相互学习的同事关系,在课堂中构筑相互倾听和对话的关系,同时组织家长和市民参与教学、协助教师共同培育儿童,将学校创建为“学习共同体”的改革理念和方略的当代教育家是()
一家商店为回收资金,把甲乙两件商品均以480元一件卖出。已知甲商品赚了20%,乙商品亏了20%,则商店盈亏结果为()。
辛亥革命是20世纪中国的第一次历史性巨变,在中国近代历史上具有伟大意义,主要是
通常,在该图书馆架构无线局域网(WLAN)的设计流程需要经过以下6个阶段:A.设备软硬件安装、调试B.确定无线局域网物理结构C.确定无线局域网逻辑结构D.进行需求分析和现场调研E.验收测试和维护F.进行设备产
算法的一条指令对应几个操作?()
如今,电脑对很多中国家庭来说早已不是新鲜东西了,而渐渐成为他们生活的一部分。对已经退休的老程来说,电脑与他家庭的关系更是非同一般。老程为了正在读医学博士的儿子花去近万元买了一台电脑。儿子通过电脑网络查了很多世界上的先进资料,他的课题因此做得十分顺利
最新回复
(
0
)