2. 考研
  3. Not long ago, Barack Obama was hoping that high-speed trains would provide America with the desired benefits. First, building th

Not long ago, Barack Obama was hoping that high-speed trains would provide America with the desired benefits. First, building th

admin2021-09-17  50
问题    Not long ago, Barack Obama was hoping that high-speed trains would provide America with the desired benefits. First, building the special tracks and locomotives would put a division or two of America’s army of unemployed back to work. Then, once built, the trains would get people out of cars and planes and to their destinations in a way that would be cleaner and use less foreign oil. But those dreams have mostly died. Republicans have decided that government spending, not outdated infrastructure, is the real problem, and Republican governors in Florida, Wisconsin and Ohio have rejected federal money to begin building.
   Only in California does the dream live on. As Governor Jerry Brown, aged 73 and a Democrat, likes to remember, another big railway project in the 19th century connected the young state to the rest of America. Of late, he has compared his state’s planned high-speed train to the Panama and Suez canals.
   California’s voters used to agree. In a 2008 ballot measure, they approved $9 billion in bonds to fund just such a train. As advertised, it was to connect the two big population centres, Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay area. The project was to cost $33 billion and be completed as early as 2020.
   Then the iron law of infrastructure projects asserted itself. According to current estimates, the train would in fact cost three times as much or more, and take 13 years longer to build. Mr. Obama still wants to help; he has asked Congress for $35 billion in railway funding over five years, of which $3.5 billion may go to California. But even with the bond funds, those dollops would cover less than 13% of the estimated cost. Republicans are in no mood to allocate more.
   It gets worse. After the ballot measure, it was decided that construction should begin not in the two population centres but in the vast and flat farmlands of the Central Valley, where building is much easier. A highspeed train would then run through sparsely populated countryside, with hardly anybody riding it. Some call this a "train to nowhere" , others a white elephant. Using a rather more original metaphor Richard White, a professor of history at Stanford, calls it "a Vietnam of transportation: easy to begin and difficult and expensive to stop" .
   
Only in California does the dream live on because_____.
选项 A、its governor is a Democrat
B、Brown likes to remember another big railway project in the 19th century
C、Brown regards the planned high-speed train as very important
D、California’s voters are all supportive
答案C
解析 细节题。根据题干关键词定位至第二段。此段讲到加利福尼亚州建造高铁尚存希望的原因主要是州长布朗。他“喜欢回忆19世纪另一项宏伟的铁路工程，该工程使成立不久的加利福尼亚州与美国的其他地区相连通”，因此， “他把计划修建的高铁与巴拿马运河及苏伊士运河作对比，该计划一样势在必行”。因此C项“布朗认为已计划修建的高铁非常重要”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/S41Z777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)