首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Rules for Unconventional Research After years of observing and sometimes participating in the "fringe science" arena, I’ve c
Rules for Unconventional Research After years of observing and sometimes participating in the "fringe science" arena, I’ve c
admin
2013-06-03
34
问题
Rules for Unconventional Research
After years of observing and sometimes participating in the "fringe science" arena, I’ve come up with a set of rules which I try to follow.
Rule One: If I’ve made a discovery which violates the laws of conventional physics, then I’ve almost definitely made a mistake somewhere.
Seriously! Even though I’m involved with non-mainstream science, I intentionally maintain this "skeptic" belief for many reasons. If I let myself start "knowing" that I’ve found anomaly, I will stop, trying to double-check the results, trying to think up conventional explanations, trying to look for mistakes, looking for subtle ways I’ve fooled myself. I’ve seen how easy it is for people to talk themselves into things. I want to avoid these traps. Second, if I keep strongly suspecting an error, I will resist the temptation to let my ego get the better of me. I know the extent and the power of my ego, and that delusions of being great are very easy to fall into.
Rule Two: Publicise it and let others help me find my mistake. Avoid SECRECY, the destroyer of new science.
This rule is a natural consequence of rule one: If I intentionally maintain a conviction that there is a mistake somewhere, then wide publicity is the fastest way to get help in finding it. If instead I hide my discovery from all the greedy people who want to steal it, then I also subvert (搅乱) the whole process of idea-testing by fellow researchers. If my discovery is a mistake or delusion, others may help me discover this, but if I keep it secret, I may remain deluded for decades.
I’ve come to see that there is one big thing that ruins these fields of amateur research. That thing is SECRECY. Every time amateurs think they’ve stumbled across something important, they go silent and treat their discovery as a Big Important Secret which must be preserved at all costs from the many enemies who want to steal it. This is garbage! At the same time, it wrecks their discovery by burying it. True, there are often business reasons, but the majority of "weird science" discoveries are not kept secret for this reason. They are kept secret because of shameful human psychology, because of inventors’ desire for attention, because of our need to control, and because of our need to be important, to gain fame and accolades, etc. I can say such things because I too have suffered from this kind of "inventor’s disease". I solved the problem by posting my inventions on Internet! If a single inventor discovers something wonderful, but it does no good at all for mankind, and is not really a discovery at all, it is an ego trip. Only if an inventor discovers something wonderful and then STARTS SELLING PRODUCTS, or better yet, TELLS EVERYONE THE SECRET, does it make the world a better place.
Rule Three: Figure out what other o/u inventors did, and then do the opposite!
Inventors over and over have announced o/u discoveries, yet where are they now? Secrecy is the biggest one. Another one is to assume that everyone wants to steal your valuable discovery. Another one is the attempt to sell the discovery to governments or giant corporations. Another is the loss of humility and pursuit of fame. Another is the assumption that scientists will automatically hall your discovery, and that businesses will compete for rights to manufacture it.
Therefore, in order to succeed, we must do some historical research, discover the guaranteed routes to failure, and then avoid them.
Rule Four: Keep a journal. If you notice something strange, WRITE IT DOWN.
Human minds are funny about anything which violates our expectations. Our minds want to maintain a coherent world, so we tend to forget things which don’t fit. Amateur scientists should never stop fighting against this tendency in themselves. Avoid too much skepticism. Search for "weird" unexpected phenomena. And if ever you see some, write them down ! Here’s a story about my own encounter with this issue.
I was using a VandeGraaff generator to power a "Franklin’s Wheel" electrostatic (静电的) motor. I was working in a dusty shop, and little hairs would jump onto the brass knobs of the Franklin motor. I wiped them away, but one of the hairs simply would not leave. It was a thin gray hair about 2mm long, and even though I wiped and wiped, the same hair kept jumping back to the knob. But then I looked more closely and realized that something weird was going on. That hair was a ghost. When I viewed it against a white background, it was completely invisible. When I viewed it against a normal complicated background, it looked like a tiny fiber of transparent glass. "Very weird?" I thought to myself. "I must remember to play with it tomorrow when I have more time." Ten years later I read an article in ESJ about fiber-like air flows created by the polished knobs of a Wimshurst machine. THAT WAS IT! That "ghost hair" thing! But then I realized that it had not just slipped my mind ten years earlier. Instead my brain had edited it out. I had been trying to fit that "fiber" into my prior experience, and having no luck, it was confusing me. It was an interesting phenomenon, but it was also deeply unsettling. I was going to look at it more closely, but my subconscious got there first and protected my "reality" by giving me amnesia (失忆症) ! When I read Charles Yost’s article about it in ES J, my original memories came back, but I noticed that they had a weird "feel" to them. To me they felt like I was remembering a dream, as if the "ghost hair" event had happened to somebody else. l suspect that my brain had stored the memories in a different way than normal. I had no access to them until something broke through the amnesia, and then the "feel" of the memory was different than the "feel" of a normal conscious recollection which is accessible through usual mental association. I suspect that this sort of thing is common in science. Somebody announces a great discovery, and many other people remember seeing clear evidence for the same thing. Is the discoverer a great genius, or was he/she simply the only one with the good sense to write down an observed anomaly, and then to follow it up?
The writer sums up the four rules based on his own experience.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/S4g7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、ShediedacrossfromtheUSDepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment.B、USDepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopmentthre
Treesarearenewableresourcethatwhenmanagedproperlycan______ourneedsindefinitely.
Idon’texpecttoomuchofthisEnglishproficiencytest,____________(能考及格我就很满意了).
Doyoufindgettingupinthemorningsodifficultthatit’s【S1】______?Thismightbecalledlaziness,butDr.Kleitmanhasan
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteaboutOnlineEducation.Youshouldwriteatleast120wordsfollowingtheout
【C1】______hundredsofyears,artistshavebeencraftingbeautifulteapotstobrewjusttheright【C2】______oftea.TheYixing
Aslongagoasthefourteenthcentury,anEnglishmanmade______thediscoverythatpeoplewouldratherpaylargesumsofmoney
Although"liedetectors"arewidelyusedbygovernments,policedepartmentsandbusinesses,theresultsarenotalwaysaccurate.
A、Hetoldnooneabouthisdisease.B、Heworkedhardtopayforhismedication.C、Hedependedonthenursesinhisfinaldays.D
RightandLeft-handednessinHumansWhydohumans,virtuallyaloneamongallanimalspecies,displayadistinctleft-orrigh
随机试题
垂体门脉系统损伤时,哪些激素不减少
洋地黄中毒特征性的心电图表现为
背景资料:某项目部在北方地区承担某城市主干路道路工程施工任务,设计快车道宽为11.25m,辅路宽为9m。项目部应业主要求,将原计划安排在次年4月初施工的沥青混凝土面层,提前到当年11月上、中旬,抢铺出一条快车道以缓解市交通。问题:为保证本次沥青面层
李某本科毕业后获得法学硕士学位,在某律所工作6年以后,李某打算进入期货行业发展,但是没有通过期货从业资格考试,根据规定,李某可以担任期货公司的()职务。
中国人世以来,伴随着中国汽车的“井喷式”增长,钢铁业也实现了持续快速增长。近年来跨国钢铁企业争先恐后地来到中国,更严酷的竞争已经来到中国钢铁企业的家门口。如何把握发展的机遇,抢占市场,在未来的竞争中赢得主动,是钢铁企业必须面对和思考的问题。钢铁行
位于某市区的一家房地产开发公司,2008年度开发建设办公楼一栋,12月与某生产性外商投资企业签订一份购销合同,将办公楼销售给该生产性外商投资企业,销售金额共计1200万元。合同载明,外商投资企业向房地产开发公司支付货币资金900万元,另将一块未作任何开发的
最早编制的智力量表是_________。
(2016年)若是微分方程y′+p(x)y=q(x)的两个解,则q(x)=()
(37)搜索引擎没有自己的数据,当用户输入检索关键词时,它将用户的请求同时向多个搜索引擎递交,对返回的结果进行重复排除、重新排序等处理后,作为自己的结果返回给用户。
"Ifwintercomes,canspringbefarbehind?"isanepigrammaticlineby______
最新回复
(
0
)