首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
admin
2017-09-22
42
问题
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25.
For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
Are You Afraid of MOOCs?
Are MOOCs and other online materials a threat to quality public higher education, and to our role as professors? The members of the philosophy department at San Jose State University think so. They recently issued an open letter to Michael Sandel, a professor of Harvard University, objecting to his role in encouraging the use of MOOCs at public universities. The controversy stems from San Jose State’s contract with edX, a company that provides MOOCs, including one based on Sandel’s course on justice at Harvard. San Jose State has agreed to use materials provided by edX, but the philosophy department has refused to use Sandel’s online lectures in its courses. Though MOOCs are still new, many of the arguments presented by the San Jose State philosophy professors do not ring true in light of my experience.
We should begin by distinguishing two issues. The philosophy professors state that they have felt pressured by their administration to use the materials from Sandel’s course. The administration denies exerting any such pressure. Whatever the truth of the matter, that is an issue of academic freedom, and not about the pedagogical merits of using MOOCs and other online materials. I certainly agree that professors should be, responsible for the content and pedagogy in their own courses.
The real issue, then, is whether the availability and use of online materials, whether through MOOCs or through other channels, is a threat to quality education, especially at public universities. Many of the arguments presented in the letter presuppose an either/or, all-or-nothing approach when it comes to face-to-face versus online teaching. But the whole point of a hybrid, or blended, course is that it combines both. And it is difficult to see why it makes a great deal of difference whether the online content is delivered via a MOOC or not.
Nothing will ever replace the face-to-face discussions that occur in the classroom. But in many traditional, on-campus courses, little discussion occurs. In a lecture course with hundreds, or even just scores, of students, much of the time in the classroom is inevitably spent with the professor lecturing and the students(hopefully)taking notes-or at least listening attentively. In courses with a significant lecture component, the advantages of using online lectures are undeniable. I know from my own experience that, if my attention wanes for a few moments, it is very convenient to simply go back and play a portion again. One can do the same if one doesn’t quite understand something the first time. And one need not miss material to take a bathroom break.
The availability of high-quality online lectures is an opportunity to rethink how we spend our time in the classroom. If an online lecture presents the material, or walks students through an argument, we are freed to spend more time discussing the aspects of the material that are most difficult-or most interesting. We can do other kinds of activities that we might not have time for if we felt obliged to present the material in the traditional way. Yes, hybrid courses usually involve less face-to-face time, but that time can be better and more effectively spent.
The crucial thing is that
the instructor remains in the driver’s seat
-and that takes us back to academic freedom. As long as individual professors are choosing what material to assign or recommend, running their in-class discussions and adding material that they think is not adequately covered in the online lectures, choosing the assignments and tests, and grading those tests, there is no threat to the professoriate, or to the quality of education at universities, public or otherwise.
With the help of online lectures, professors can______.
选项
A、use the classroom time more effectively
B、have more face-to-face time with students
C、develop more materials for offline instruction
D、enjoy more free time and breaks between classes
答案
A
解析
根据第5段最后一句“Yes,hybrid courses…more effectively spent”,可排除B,确定选A,而C,D文中没有提到。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/S59d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
Readthefollowingstatement:Onlyunderofficiallawsoradministrativeregulationscanwedefendastableandreliableexa
YouareBarbaraCrust,themotherofRoger.YouwritealettertoinviteAlfred,Roger’sbestfriendatschool,tocomeandstay
HereisaletterwhichcomplainsaboutthequalityoftheTVsetboughtinastore.Readtheletterandcompletethegiveninfor
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
Lookatthefollowingadvertisement.ChinaDailyWewouldliketohearyouropinionsaboutthe
Readthefollowingletterandcompletethegiveninformationform.Writeaword,phraseornumberinthespaces1-5.De
随机试题
断层面两侧的岩块按其运动方向,相对上升的一盘为上升盘,相对下降的一盘为下降盘。上盘只能是上升盘,不可为下降盘。()
1998年中共中央决定在县级以上党政领导班子、领导干部中开展党性党风教育活动,其主要内容是()
在诱发同种移植排斥反应中免疫原性最强的细胞是
下列哪项不能诱发窦性心动过速
运输除药用阿片外的麻醉药品和罂粟壳,生产和供应单位在发货人记事栏加盖医疗单位购用麻醉药品需
一对斜齿圆柱齿轮的正确啮合条件是()。
甲公司拥有一条生产线,生产的产品主要销往国外。甲公司以人民币为记账本位币,销往国外的产品采用美元结算。甲公司2015年年末对该生产线进行减值测试。相关资料如下:(1)该生产线的原值为5000万元,已计提累计折旧1000万元,预计尚可使用2年。假定该生产线
下列关于单位犯罪的表述中,错误的是()。(2009年单选6)
Itwassupposedtobethenew-mediaelection.E-mail,blogging,socialnetworkingandtweetingwereexpectedtosurgeinimporta
一般认为,模块独立的概念是模块化、抽象、______和局部化概念的直接结果。
最新回复
(
0
)