首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The most obvious difference between real essays and the things one has to write in school is that real essays are not exclusivel
The most obvious difference between real essays and the things one has to write in school is that real essays are not exclusivel
admin
2012-11-30
96
问题
The most obvious difference between real essays and the things one has to write in school is that real essays are not exclusively about English literature. Certainly schools should teach students how to write. But due to a series of historical accidents the teaching of writing has gotten mixed together with the study of literature. And so all over the country students are writing not about how a baseball team with a small budget might compete with the Yankees, or the role of color in fashion, or what constitutes a good dessert, but about symbolism in Dickens.
How did things get this way? To answer that we have to go back almost a thousand years. Around 1100, Europe at last began to catch its breath after centuries of chaos, and once they had the luxury of curiosity they rediscovered what we call "the classics." The effect was rather as if we were visited by beings from another solar system. These earlier civilizations were so much more sophisticated that for the next several centuries the main work of European scholars, in almost every field, was to assimilate what they knew. During this period the study of ancient texts acquired great prestige. It seemed the essence of what scholars did. As European scholarship gained momentum it became less and less important; by 1350 someone who wanted to learn about science could find better teachers than Aristotle in his own era. But schools change slower than scholarship. In the 19th century the study of ancient texts was still the backbone of the curriculum. What tipped the scales, at least in the US, seems to have been the idea that professors should do research as well as teach. This idea was imported from Germany in the late 19th century. Beginning at Johns Hopkins in 1876, the new model spread rapidly. Writing was one of the casualties. Colleges had long taught English composition, But how do you do research on composition? The professors who taught math could be required to do original math, the professors who taught history could be required to write scholarly articles about history, but what about the professors who taught rhetoric or composition? What should they do research on? The closest thing seemed to be English literature.
And so in the late 19th century the teaching of writing was inherited by English professors. This had two drawbacks: (a) an expert on literature need not himself be a good writer, any more than an art historian has to be a good painter, and (b) the subject of writing now tends to be literature, since that’s what the professor is interested in.
It’ s no wonder if this seems to the student a pointless exercise, because we’ re now three steps removed from real work: the students are imitating English professors, who are imitating classical scholars, who are merely the inheritors of a tradition growing out of what was, 700 years ago, fascinating and urgently needed work.
The other big difference between a real essay and the things they make you write in school is that a real essay doesn’t take a position and then defend it. That principle, like the idea that we ought to be writing about literature, turns out to be another intellectual hangover of long forgotten origins.
It’s often mistakenly believed that medieval universities were mostly seminaries. In fact they were more law schools. And at least in our tradition lawyers are advocates, trained to take either side of an argument and make as good a case for it as they can. Whether cause or effect, this spirit pervaded early universities. The study of rhetoric, the art of arguing persuasively, was a third of the undergraduate curriculum. And after the lecture the most common form of discussion was the disputation. This is at least nominally preserved in our present-day thesis defense: most people treat the words thesis and dissertation as interchangeable, but originally, at least, a thesis was a position one took and the dissertation was the argument by which one defended it. Defending a position may be a necessary evil in a legal dispute, but it’s not the best way to get at the truth, as I think lawyers would be the first to admit. It’ s not just that you miss subtleties this way. The real problem is that you can’ t change the question.
And yet this principle is built into the very structure of the things they teach you to write in high school. The topic sentence is your thesis, chosen in advance, the supporting paragraphs the blows you strike in the conflict, and the conclusion -- uh, what is the conclusion? I was never sure about that in high school. It seemed as if we were just supposed to restate what we said in the first paragraph, but in different enough words that no one could tell. Why bother? But when you understand the origins of this sort of "essay," you can see where the conclusion comes from. It’s the concluding remarks to the jury.
Good writing should be convincing, certainly, but it should be convincing because you got the right answers, not because you did a good job of arguing. When I give a draft of an essay to friends, there are two things I want to know: which parts bore them, and which seem unconvincing. The boring bits can usually be fixed by cutting. But I don’ t try to fix the unconvincing bits by arguing more cleverly.
The sort of writing that attempts to persuade may be a valid (or at least inevitable) form, but it’ s historically inaccurate to call it an essay. An essay is something you write to try to figure something out. Figure out what? You don’ t know yet. And so you can’ t begin with a thesis, because you don’ t have one, and may never have one. An essay doesn’t begin with a statement, but with a question. In a real essay, you don’ t take a position and defend it. You notice a door that’ s ajar, and you open it and walk in to see what’ s inside. In the things you write in school you are, in theory, merely explaining yourself to the reader. In a real essay you’ re writing for yourself. You’ re thinking out loud.
Questions aren’t enough. An essay has to come up with answers. They don’ t always, of course. Some- times you start with a promising question and get nowhere. But those you don’ t publish. Those are like experiments that get inconclusive results. An essay you publish ought to tell the reader something he didn’t already know.
But what you tell him doesn’t matter, so long as it’ s interesting. I’ m sometimes accused of meandering. In defend-a-position writing that would be a flaw. There you’ re not concerned with truth. You already know where you’ re going, and you want to go straight there, blustering through obstacles, and hand-waving your way across swampy ground ( 沼泽地 ). But that’s not what you’ re trying to do in an essay. An essay is supposed to be a search for truth. It would be suspicious if it didn’t meander.
Like a river that must flow down at each step, for the essayist this translates to: flow interesting. Of all the places to go next, choose the most interesting. Of course, this doesn’t always work. Sometimes, like a river, one runs up against a wail. Then I do the same thing the river does: backtrack. At one point in this essay I found that after following a certain thread I ran out of ideas. I had to go back seven paragraphs and start over in another direction.
Fundamentally an essay is a train of thought -- but a Cleaned-up train of thought, as dialogue is cleaned- up conversation. Real thought, like real conversation, is full of false starts, It would be exhausting to read. You need to cut and fill to emphasize the central thread, like an illustrator inking over a pencil drawing. But don’ t change so much that you lose the spontaneity of the original.
Err on the side of the river. An essay is not a reference work. It’s not something you read looking for a specific answer, and feel cheated if you don’ t find it. I’d much rather read an essay that went off in an unexpected but interesting direction than one that plodded dutifully along a prescribed course.
The idea that professors should do research as well as teach was imported from Germany in the late 19th century.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
A
解析
本题根据第四段第一、二句而设,“...seems to have been the idea that professors should do research as well as teach. This idea was imported from Germany in the late 19th century.”题干将前两句合二为一。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SMb7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
IdisapproveofdietssostronglybecauseIthinkit’swrongto______yourbodyofcertainfoods.
Hiseffectiveapproachhadwonhima______asatoughmanager.
Tradesecretsand______informationarelikelytobeamongthemostvaluableassetsofmanybusinesses.
Weshouldmakeaclear______betweenthetwoscientifictermsforthepurposeofourdiscussion.
Therearevariousfactorsduringthework,sowemusttakeallthesefully______account.
Itisreportedthatthereisnobetter______formother’smilk.
A、Herdaughterisn’tinherclass.B、Sheisn’trelatedtothestudent.C、Shedoesn’tthinkthatshelookslikethestudent.D、Th
A、Mostofthemweren’tinterestedinthetopic.B、Mostofthemwerewillingtotelltheirstories.C、Someofthemrefusedherin
随机试题
患儿,女,12岁,外伤后复视歪头视物半个月,临床诊断为右眼外直肌麻痹。该患者的代偿头位可能是
患者,男性,8岁,居住于农村。因发热、头痛3天,加重2天住院。3天前患儿突然发热,体温最高38.6℃,伴头痛,大便每日2~3次,稀便。近两天来体温持续在39℃以上,头痛加重,并且出现恶心、呕吐,时有烦躁、抽搐。病前10天当地下暴雨,患者曾赤脚在水中玩耍。体
暂时性牙关紧闭常发生于
定性和定量相结合的分析方法不包括()。
根据《中华人民共和国循环经济促进法》,国家鼓励和支持行业协会在循环经济发展中发挥()作用。
个人消费贷款包括()。
《公安机关人民警察辞退办法》第四条规定:人民警察有下列情形之一,经批评教育、纪律处分仍不改正的,或者经培训试用后仍不合格的,应当予以辞退()。
在5000多年文明发展进程中,中华民族创造了博大精深的灿烂文化。在当下,如何“让收藏在禁宫里的文物、陈列在广阔大地上的遗产、书写在古籍里的文字都活起来”,已成为我们必须面对的现实问题。试想,如果传统文化失去了与时代的连接、缺少了与现代人的情感沟通和心
初中生思维最主要的特点就是其思维的()
中国的饮食方式正在发生许多变化。众所周知,中国的饮食文化具有悠久的历史。人们采用肉、蔬菜、豆制品等能做出各种美味食品。但往往耗时多。这一点与快节奏的现代社会极不相符。如今我们有了许多不同的选择:除传统家常菜外,还有营养保健配餐和方便可口的快餐食品。由于午休
最新回复
(
0
)