首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical
admin
2013-01-20
50
问题
Scientists researching hypnosis have uncovered evidence that counters some of the skepticism about the technique. One skeptical hypothesis is that hypnosis may be the product of "vivid imagination", a now discredited charge stemming from the observation that many people who are hypnotizable can be led to experience compellingly realistic auditory and visual hallucinations. Nothing that an auditory hallucination and the act of imagining a sound are both self-generated and that,like real hearing,a hallucination is experienced as the product of an external source, Henry Szechtman used PET (positron emission tomography) to image the brain activity of hypnotized subjects invited to imagine a scenario and then experiencing a hallucination. By monitoring regional blood flow in areas activated during both hearing and auditory hallucination but not during simple imagining, the investigators sought to determine where in the brain a hallucinated sound is mistakenly "tagged"as authentic and originating in the outside world.
Szechtman imaged the brain activity of eight very hypnotizable subjects who had been prescreened for their ability to hallucinate under hypnosis. During the session,the subjects were under hypnosis and lay in the PET scanner with their brain activity being monitored under four conditions:at rest;while hearing an audiotape of a voice,while imagining hearing the voice again;and during the auditory hallucination they experienced after being informed that the tape was playing once more,although it was not. The tests suggested that a region of the brain called the right anterior cingulate cortex was just as active while the vol-unteers were hallucinating as it was while they were actually hearing the stimulus. In contrast, that brain area remained dormant while the subjects were imagining that they heard the stimulus.
The second major objection raised by critics argues that hypnosis’ ability to blunt pain results from either simple relaxation or a placebo response. McGlashan established that while hypnosis was only as effective in reducing pain as a sugar pill for poorly hypnotizable people,highly hypnotizable subjects benefited three times more from hypnosis than from the placebo. In response to these successes,Rainville devised experiments to determine which brain structures are involved in pain relief during hypnosis,attempting to locate the brain structures associated with the suffering component of pain,as distinct from its sensory aspects. Using PET, he and other scientists found that hypnosis reduced the activity of the anterior cingulate cortex—an area known to be involved in pain—but did not affect the activity of the somatosensory cortex, where the sensations of pain are processed.
Despite the value of these findings,the mechanisms underlying hypnotic pain relief are still poorly understood. The model favored by most researchers is that the analgesic effect of hypnosis occurs in higher brain centers than those involved in registering the painful sensation, accounting for the fact that most autonomic responses that routinely accompany pain—such as increased heart rate—are relatively unaffected by hypnotic suggestions of analgesia.
The research described in the passage is primarily concerned with answering which of the following questions?
选项
A、What research guarantees the reality of the effects that hypnosis has on brain activity, and what is their causal mechanism?
B、How are experiments devoted to disproving the "vivid imagination"objection to hypnosis different from those devoted to disproving the"placebo effecfthesis?
C、How can researchers reproduce the useful effects of hypnosis in a medical setting?
D、What technical advances have permitted researchers to reject skeptical explanations of the phenomenon of hypnosis?
答案
C
解析
内容理解题。问的是文章主要回答了那些问题。根据原文,第二段讲了催眠对大脑活动作用;第三段讲了催眠止痛的大脑机制问题。所以正确答案是C选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SN2O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
IfyouhavereallybeenstudyingEnglishforsolong,it’sabouttimeyou______abletowritelettersinEnglish.
Itisnotsomuchthelanguage______theculturalbackgroundthatmakesthebookdifficulttounderstand.
Generally,acomputerisanydevicethatcanperformnumericalcalculations.Currently,【1】,thetermusuallyrefers【2】anelectr
Cultureshockmightbecalledan【1】diseaseofpeoplewhohavebeensuddenly【2】abroad.Likemostailments,ithasitsown【3】andc
Jack______fromhomefortwodaysnow,andIambeginningtoworryabouthissafety.
Ourape-menforefathershadnoobviousnaturalweaponsinthestruggleforsurvivalintheopen.Theyhadneitherthepowerfult
The______ofthespringwaterattractsalotofvisitorsfromalloverthecountry.
Thinkaboutwhatwouldmakeyoureally,reallyhappy.Moremoney?Wrong.Smiling,well-adjustedkids?Wrongagain.Thefactisw
Thesizzlingsteamsofsunlightwerejustbeautifullyglimmeringdownonthecrispgreenschoolyard.Suchawonderfuldaythatw
随机试题
现行选举法规定,以下哪些可以提名、推荐人民代表大会候选人?()
法与共产党的政策在表现形式上不同,表现在()
年利率为12%,存款额为1000元,期限为一年,以一年四次按季利率计息,则其有效利率和一年后的本利和分别为()。
过境税
决定模拟分权制成败的关键之一是()。
甲公司2018年至2021年发生的与房地产有关的业务如下:(1)2018年12月31日,甲公司从外部购入一栋建筑物,购买价款为1450万元,相关税费为50万元,预计使用年限为50年,预计净残值为0,采用直线法计提折旧。(2)2019年1月1日,甲公司将
王某持匕首抢劫张某,在争斗中王某头部撞击墙角昏迷倒地,匕首掉在地上。张某见状,捡起匕首往王某心脏部位猛刺数下,导致王某死亡。对于张某用匕首刺死王某的行为,下列说法正确的是()。
根据下面的短文写一篇不少于800字的现代文,体裁不限(诗歌、戏剧、小说除外)。《小王子》是法国作家圣.埃克苏佩里于1942年写成的著名儿童文学短篇小说。书中有这样一段对话:“最好还是在原来的那个时间来。”狐狸说道,“比如说,你下午四点钟
敏捷供应链系统的体系结构是以基本功能体为核心的,辅助以各种工具,通过应用这些工具可方便地对系统进行配置。但它不关注于实现系统的()。
Indiaistofrugality(节俭)asBethlehemistoJesus.Asrichcountriesenteraneweraof【C1】______,thebestpracticesofthegur
最新回复
(
0
)