首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animals.
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animals.
admin
2019-09-23
38
问题
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animals. The practice, they argue, threatens human health by turning farms into breeding grounds of drug-resistant bacteria. Farmers responded that restricting antibiotics in livestock would devastate the industry and significantly raise costs to consumers. We have empirical data that should resolve this debate. Since 1995, Denmark has enforced progressively tighter rules on the use of antibiotics in raising pigs, poultry and other livestock. In the process, it has shown that it’s possible to protect human health without hurting farmers.
Farmers in many countries use antibiotics in two key ways: (1) at full strength to treat sick animals and (2) in low doses to fatten meat-producing livestock or to prevent veterinary illnesses. Although even the proper use of antibiotics can inadvertently lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, the habit of using a low or "sub-therapeutic" dose is a formula for disaster: the treatment provides just enough antibiotic to kill some but not all bacteria. The germs that survive are typically those that happen to bear genetic mutations for resisting the antibiotic. They then reproduce and exchange genes with other microbial resisters. Because bacteria are found literally everywhere, resistant strains produced in animals eventually find their way into people as well. You could hardly design a better system for guaranteeing the spread of antibiotic resistance.
The data from multiple studies over the years support the conclusion that low doses of antibiotics in animals increase the number of drug-resistant microbes in both animals and people. As Joshua M. Scharfstein, a principal deputy commissioner at the Food and Drug Administration, put it, "You actually can trace the specific bacteria around and ... find that the resistant strains in humans match the resistant strains in the animals." And this science is what led Denmark to stop sub-therapeutic dosing of chickens, pigs and other farm animals.
Although the transition unfolded smoothly in the poultry industry, the average weight of pigs fell in the first year. But after Danish farmers started leaving piglets together with their mothers a few weeks longer to bolster their immune systems naturally, the animals’ weights jumped back up, and the number of pigs per litter increased as well. The lesson is that improving animal husbandry — making sure that stalls and cages are properly cleaned and giving animals more room or time to mature —
offsets
the initial negative impact of limiting antibiotic use. Today Danish industry reports that productivity is higher than before. Meanwhile, reports of antibiotic resistance in Danish people are mixed, which shows — as if we needed reminding — that there are no quick fixes.
Of course, the way veterinary antibiotics are used is not the only cause of human drug-resistant infections. Careless use of the drugs in people also contributes to the problem. But agricultural use is still a major contributing factor. Every day brings new evidence that we are in danger of losing effective antibiotic protection against many of the most dangerous bacteria that cause human illness. The technical issues are solvable. Denmark’s example proves that it is possible to cut antibiotic use on farms without triggering financial disaster. In fact, it might provide a competitive advantage. Stronger measures to deprive drug-resistant bacteria of their agricultural breeding grounds simply make scientific, economic and common sense.
When the Danish authorities ordered farmers to cease giving antibiotics to their farm animals,______.
选项
A、the farmers refused to cooperate
B、animals took longer to put on weight
C、animal productivity quickly began to rise
D、young pigs gained less weight in their first year
答案
D
解析
推断题。第4段第1句提到家禽业转型顺利,但是猪的平均体重在第一年有所下降,故选D。注意B(动物需要更长时间增重)容易误选,这是对第4段第2句的过度解读。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SVMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Washington:TheBushadministrationhas【L1】______forthefirsttimethatitmaybewillingto【L2】______amultinationalforcein
Whatissuggestedforyourinvestment?
Whichofthefollowingistrueaboutthepolitician?
A、Familybackground.B、Chemistry.C、Agedifference.D、Awisechoice.D事实细节的找寻和判断。根据原文Thekey,hesays…Itis…areyouready?Thati
A、Busy,wealthyandintellectual.B、Busy,wealthyandtraditional.C、Busy,abstemiousandtraditional.D、Busy,intellectualand
A、Allthepassengers.B、About1,650.C、52.D、Notsure.B数字信息的找寻和判断。根据原文AboardtheAndreaDoriawere1,706persons,passengersand
KidsCanbeGoodforMarriage,ReallyVocabularyandExpressionsworld-alteringrelationship-alteringthriveem
ReportersWithoutBordersReportersWithoutBorders(RWB)wasfoundedin1985inFrance.Atfirst,the【L1】______workedtopr
Nike’sSuccessNikeperformedwellduringthelastquarter.Businesswasupineverymajormarket,in【L1】______,bothinits
Nike’sSuccessNikeperformedwellduringthelastquarter.Businesswasupineverymajormarket,in【L1】______,bothinits
随机试题
Youcan’tbelievethathewasa______modelwhenhewasyoung.
发包人收到工程竣工报告后( )天内,组织专家验收组,制定验收方案。
建设工程目标控制任务中的施工招标阶段的基本内容有( )。
架空线路上的金具有()。
下列各种物资中,不应当作为企业存货核算的有()。
一瓶浓度为95%的酒精270克,现要配置出质量相同的浓度为75%和60%的两种酒精溶液,并要求把原酒精溶液用完,则共需水()。
简述我国现行宪法的修改制度。(2011简65)
计算
用树型结构表示实体及实体间联系的数据模型称为【】。
Althoughshewasstillill,she______herselffromthehospital.(2004年湖北省考博试题)
最新回复
(
0
)