首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsof
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsof
admin
2012-12-30
30
问题
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! demanding independent proof that they were making promised changes to protect the privacy of users’ search history. They also urged Google to store sensitive search data for only six months instead of nine.
Ten privacy and data-protection commissioners from countries including Canada, Germany and Britain wrote a public letter to Eric Schmidt, Google’s boss, demanding changes in Google Buzz, the firm’s social-networking service, which had been criticised for dipping into users’ Gmail accounts to find "followers" for them without clearly explaining what it was doing. Google promptly complied.
Such run-ins with regulators are likely to multiply and limit the freedom of global Internet firms. It is not just that online privacy has become a controversial issue. More importantly, privacy rules are national, but data flows lightly and instantly across borders, often thanks to companies like Google and Fa-cebook, which manage vast databases.
A recent scandal dubbed "Wi-Figate" exemplifies the problem. Google (accidentally, it insists) gathered data from unsecured Wi-Fi networks in people’s homes as part of a project to capture images of streets around the world. A number of regulators launched investigations. Yet their reaction varied widely, even within the European Union, where member states have supposedly aligned their stance on online privacy. Some European regulators ordered Google to preserve the data it had collected in their bailiwicks; others demanded that information related to their countries be destroyed.
Despite such differences within Europe, the gap is much greater between Europe and America, home to many of the world’s largest online social networks and search engines. European regulations are inspired by the conviction that data privacy is a fundamental human right and that individuals should be in control of how their data are used. America, on the other hand, takes a more relaxed view, allowing people to use consumer-protection laws to seek redress if they feel their privacy has been violated. Companies that handle users’ data are largely expected to police themselves.
Some experts say this dichotomy explains why Silicon Valley firms that strike out abroad have sometimes been the targets of European Union data watchdogs. Jules Polonetsky of the Future of Privacy Forum, a think tank, says that many American firms have yet to learn that showing up in Europe and extolling the virtues of self-regulation is likely to be as ineffective as rightwing politicians denouncing antidiscrimination laws back home.
Transatlantic friction between companies and regulators has grown as Europe’s data guardians have become more assertive. Francesca Bignami, a professor at George Washington University’s law school, says that the explosion of digital technologies has made it impossible for watchdogs to keep a close eye on every web company operating in their backyard. So instead they are relying more on scapegoating prominent wrongdoers in the hope that this will deter others.
But regulators such as Peter Schaar, who heads Germany’s federal data-protection agency, say the gulf is exaggerated. Some European countries, he points out, now have rules that make companies who suffer big losses of customer data to report these to the authorities. The inspiration for these measures comes from America.
Yet even Mr. Schaar admits that the Internet’s global scale means that there will need to be changes on both sides of the Atlantic. He hints that Europe might adopt a more flexible regulatory stance if America were to create what amounts to an independent data-protection body along European lines. In Europe, where the flagship Data Protection Directive came into effect in 1995, before firms such as Google and Facebook were even founded, the European Commission is conducting a review of its privacy policies. In America, Congress has begun debating a new privacy bill and the Federal Trade Commission is considering an overhaul of its rules. David Vladeck.the head of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, has acknowledged that "existing privacy frameworks have limitations".
Even if America and Europe do narrow their differences, Internet firms will still have to grapple with other data watchdogs. In Asia, countries that belong to APEC are trying to develop a set of regional guidelines for privacy rules under an initiative known as the Data Privacy Pathfinder. Some countries such as Australia and New Zealand have longstanding privacy laws, but many emerging nations have yet to roll out fully fledged versions of their own. Mr. Polonetsky sees Asia as "a new privacy battleground", with America and Europe both keen to tempt countries towards their own regulatory model. Shoehorning such firms into antiquated privacy frameworks will not benefit either them or their users.
"Watchdogs" in the first paragraph refers to
选项
A、European data-protection agencies.
B、ten privacy and data-protection commissioners.
C、web guardians in American and Europe.
D、companies such as Google, Microsoft and Yahoo!.
答案
C
解析
推断题。首句指出“Watchdogs are growling at the web giants,and sometimes biting them.”之后,对其进行具体解释说明其中提到“European data—protection agencies wrote to Google,Microsoftand Yahoo!demanding independent proof…”,之后第二段又提及“Ten privacy and data-protectioncommissioners from countries including Canada,Germany and Britain wrote a public letter to EricSchmidt,Google’s boss,demanding changes in Google Buzz…”。可见,开篇首句为主题句,之后作者举例说明,而第三段首句的“Such run-ins with regulators are likely to multiply…”起到承上启下的作用。显然这里的regulators就是指首段提到的watchdogs,而guardians与regulators意思相近,根据例证中提到的范畴可以判断这里说的是欧美的监管机构,故[C]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SVaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
IntheUnitedStates,charterschoolsprovidealternativesto"regular"publicschools.Unlikemostpublicschools,chartersdon
Areferenceinaliteraryworktoaperson,aplaceorathinginhistoryoranotherworkofliteraryisan______.
Whoiscalled"fatherofEnglishandEuropeannovels"?
TheAmericanFamilyWe’lllearntheAmericanfamiliesfromthefollowingfiveaspects:1.Familystructures1)Immediatefamily
TheAmericanFamilyWe’lllearntheAmericanfamiliesfromthefollowingfiveaspects:1.Familystructures1)Immediatefamily
Linguistshavefoundthatsignlanguagesandspokenlanguagessharemanyfeatures.Likespokenlanguages,whichuseunitsofsou
SevenTypesofEvidenceItisimportanttolearntouseevidenceinargumentativewriting,becausewithoutevidence,youcan’t
AbreakthroughintheprovisionofenergyfromthesunfortheEuropeanEconomicCommunity(EEC)couldbebroughtforwardbyup
AbreakthroughintheprovisionofenergyfromthesunfortheEuropeanEconomicCommunity(EEC)couldbebroughtforwardbyup
随机试题
如果政府对卖者出售的商品每单位征税5美分,那么这种做法将引起这种商品的
IncomparingallofEarth’sgeologicalevolutiontoonecalendaryear,theauthorshows______.InthecompressedhistoryofEa
竞争免疫法测糖化血红蛋白的标准()。
根据《公路水运工程试验检测管理办法》规定,属于现场评审必须完成的工作是()。
我国目前在农村实行的家庭联产承包责任制度属于( )。
甲有限责任公司注册资本为120万元,股东人数为9人,董事会成员为5人,监事会成员为5人。股东一次缴清出资,该公司章程对股东表决权行使事项未作特别规定。根据公司法律制度的规定,该公司出现的下列情形中,属于应当召开临时股东会的有()。
下列不属于高中数学课程必修5的数学内容是()。
Facinguptoyourproblems______runningawayfromthemisthebestapproachtoworkingthingsout.
阅读以下材料,根据要求写一篇不少于600字的文章。“道”是指自然运行于人世共通的真理,“德”是指人世的德行。道德可以是一种承诺,掷地有声:道德可以是一种担当,责任重于泰山;道德可以是一份善良,春风化雨;道德有一个底线,无法逾越。对此,李克强
Aboutthisnovel,whichofthefollowingstatementisNOTtrue?Accordingtothepassage,whichofthefollowingstatementist
最新回复
(
0
)