首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2013-05-10
16
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"—especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramaticj much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
Which of the following sentences is NOT true?
选项
A、Oral evidence was unnecessary in France because the judges and prosecutors could read.
B、When trial by ordeal was finally abandoned throughout Europe, trial by jury was introduced in Britain.
C、In the adversarial system, it is the lawyers who play the leading roles.
D、Lawyers in Britain are prepared to lie in order to win their cases.
答案
D
解析
这道细节题所涉及的相关信息在文章的前面三段。根据第三段可以判断A选项是与原文相符的;根据第二段的第三句话,可以判断B选项与原文相符;根据第一段可以判断C选项与原文相符;只有D选项在文中找不到相关的意思,所以根据原文,只有D选项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SYxd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Duringthe1980s,unemploymentandunderemploymentinsomecountrieswasashighas90percent.Somecountriesdidnot【21】_____
Duringthe1980s,unemploymentandunderemploymentinsomecountrieswasashighas90percent.Somecountriesdidnot【21】_____
nominating本题和第3题同属信息题。难度较大。注意听原文的:“...theGRAMMYprocesscanbedividedintofivestage...”之后紧接的内容,就可以很轻松地答对这两道题。
Inthe1950s,thepioneersofartificialintelligence(AI)predictedthat,bytheendofthiscentury,computerswouldbeconversi
Therecanbenodoubtthatthecomputerrevolutionhastouchedvirtuallyeverypersoninthecountryinsomewayoranother.
Galaxiesarethemajor’buildingblocksOftheuniverse:Agalaxyisgiantfamilyofmanymillionsofstars,anditisheld
Therearemorerichpeoplethaneverbefore,includingsome7millionmillionaires,andover400billionaires.Fromsippingcham
Environmentalissuesraiseahostofdifficultethicalquestions,includingtheancientoneofthenatureofintrinsicvalue.Wh
winning分析见第2题。
Whatmustyoumakesurewhenyouloadthecassette?
随机试题
根据我国刑法规定,村民委员会等村基层组织人员,利用职务上的便利侵吞集体财产的行为,应构成()
患者男,30岁。夏天在田地里劳作时,突出现头痛、头晕、恶心。继而出现口渴,胸闷、面色苍白、冷汗淋漓,脉搏细速、血压下降,后晕倒在地,该患者最可能发生了()。
某房地产投资项目累计净现金流量开始出现正值的年份数为4,又知上年累计净现金流量为-240万元,出现正值的当年净现金流量为300万元,则该房地产投资项目的投资回收期是()年。
某投资项目流动资金财务价值估算为3000万元,估算的应收账款1500万元,应付账款400万元,现金100万元。在经济费用效益分析中,假定价格不需调整,该项目流动资金经济价值应为()万元。
沉管灌注桩主要包括()。
某酒店工程,建筑面积28700m2,地下1层,地上15层,现浇钢筋混凝土框架结构。建设单位依法进行招标,投标报价执行《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》GB50500-2013。共有甲、乙、丙等8家单位参加了工程投标。经过公开开标、评标,最后确定甲施工单位中标
由招标人组建的评标委员会的任务有()。
按照财政管理权属分类,财政收入可以划分为()。
人的终身学习具有()。
---CAUTION---HAZAROUSCAUTIONSAHEADROUGH,NARROWROADWITHLOOSEGRAVEL,STEEPGRADESANDBLINDCURVESDONOTEXCEED15M.P.
最新回复
(
0
)