首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Rising Inequality Is Holding Back the U. S. Economy [A]In announcing his run for the presidency last month, Jeb Bush has set an
Rising Inequality Is Holding Back the U. S. Economy [A]In announcing his run for the presidency last month, Jeb Bush has set an
admin
2017-01-21
25
问题
Rising Inequality Is Holding Back the U. S. Economy
[A]In announcing his run for the presidency last month, Jeb Bush has set an ambitious goal of 4 percent real growth in gross domestic product(GDP). This goal has been greeted with substantial skepticism from parts of the economics establishment, while some economists have praised it as a "worthy and viable aspiration" that could be achieved with growth-oriented policies. Our recent research implies that a 4 percent growth goal for first term of the next President is not only possible, but is what we should strive to achieve. Like Hubbard and Warsh, veteran Republican economic policymakers, we agree that the U. S. needs policies that raise labor force participation, accelerate productivity growth and improve expectations. Where we part ways is the tactics. [B]Their recommendations focus on supply-side policies, such as tax reform, regulatory reform, reduced trade friction and education and training. Our research implies that a weak demand side explains the sluggish(萧条的)recovery from the Great Recession, with the rise of income inequality as a central factor. Consequently, our policy prescriptions revolve around increasing the take-home pay of the majority of American households. The Great Recession, which began in December 2007, was the most severe American economic downturn in three-quarters of a century. Most economists did not anticipate ahead of time that this kind of thing could happen, although we warned that "it could get ugly out there" in October 2007.
[C]But as the severity of the recession became apparent in the dark days of late 2008 and early 2009, many economists predicted a swift bounce-back, reasoning from historical evidence that deep downturns are followed by rapid recoveries. Sadly, that prediction was also incorrect. The growth path following the Great Recession has been historically sluggish. Our recent research, supported by the Institute for New Economic Thinking, helps explain why: The economic drag from decades of rising income inequality has held back consumer spending.
[D]Our work studies the link between rising income inequality and U. S. household demand over the past several decades. From the middle 1980s until the middle 2000s, American consumers spent liberally despite the fact that income growth stagnated(停滞)for most of the population. We show that the annual growth rate of household income slowed markedly in 1980 for the bottom 95 percent of the income distribution, while income growth for the top 5 percent accelerated at the same time. The result was the widely discussed rise of income inequality.
[E]It is also well known that household debt grew rapidly during this period. Our work points out that the buildup of debt relative to income was concentrated in the bottom 95 percent of the income distribution. Debt to income for the top 5 percent bounced around with little clear trend: When the financial crisis hit, our work shows that the bottom 95 percent of Americans could no longer get the rising debt they needed to continue to spend along the trend they established in the years leading up to the crisis. The result was a sharp cutback in household demand relative to income that caused the collapse of the Great Recession.
[F]What about the recovery? Household demand in 2013(the most recent observation we have because our computations incorporate data that are released with a lag and are available at an annual frequency only)was a stunning 17. 5 percent below its pre-recession trend, with no sign of recovering back toward the trend. What happened? Our research implies that the cutoff of credit for the group of households falling behind as income inequality rose prevented their spending from recovering to its pre-recession path.
[G]While there is no reason to necessarily expect that consumer spending will follow a constant trend over long periods of time, the practical reality is that the U. S. economy needed the pre-recession trend of demand to maintain adequate growth and at least a rough approximation of full employment prior to 2007. In the middle 2000s, there was no sign of excess demand in the U. S. economy. Inflation was tame and interest rates were low. Wage growth was stagnant. Although some gradual slowing in long-term U. S. growth might have been predicted as the large baby-boom generation ages, the overall labor force participation rate was actually rising prior to the recession, so there was no reason to expect any significant decline in labor resources in the years immediately following 2007.
[H]Yes, the way many Americans were financing their demand was unsustainable, but there is no indication that businesses could not sustainably continue to produce along the pre-recession trend if they had been able to sell the output. Our interpretation of the evidence is that the demand drag that could be expected as the result of rising inequality is, after a delay of a-quarter century, finally constraining the U. S. economy. Intuition, theory and evidence predict that high-income people spend, on average, a smaller share of their income than everyone else does. So as a higher share of income goes into the pockets of the well-to-do, the household sector as a whole is likely to recycle less of its income back into spending, which slows the path of demand growth.
[I]A possible problem with this prediction for the U. S. in recent years is that income inequality began to rise in the early 1980s, but household demand remained strong through 2006. Our argument is that the demand drag from rising inequality was postponed by the buildup of debt-. The bottom 95 percent borrowed rather than cut back their spending when their income growth slowed. But as the crisis hit, lending to households collapsed, and the trend of rising debt could not continue.
[J]The effect of rising inequality has hit the economy hard. As a result, today’s economy is underperforming. No one can know precisely how much of the stagnation in household demand is due to the rise of inequality, but our estimates imply that the current path of total demand in the economy is at least 10 percent below where it would have been with the income distribution of the early 1980s. Where demand goes, so follows output and employment. This analysis links to the call for 4 percent growth. Considering conventional estimates of the long-term trend growth of the economy, a 4 percent growth rate through the next U. S. President’s first term would go a long way toward closing the gap in output that opened with the collapse of household spending in the Great Recession and has yet to be filled.
[K]How can we move toward this goal? Our research strongly implies that the main problem is on the demand side, not the supply side. The U. S. needs to find a way to boost demand growth by arresting, and hopefully reversing, the dramatic rise of inequality. The basic argument is exceedingly simple: The economy continues to be held back by insufficient household spending, and if the income share of Americans outside of the top sliver rises, household spending will increase. Policies that raise the minimum wage and reduce the tax burden of low- and middle-income households would help.
[L]In our view, however, the best method to achieve this objective would be to restore wage growth across the income distribution as occurred in the decades after World War II. Meeting this objective is challenging for a variety of reasons, including the fact that there remains no clear consensus about what has caused the rise of American economic inequality. But the need to address inequality is not just a matter of social justice: it also is important to get the economy back on the right track after more than seven years of stagnation. We can do better.
Labor resources were not expected to suffer from a sharp fall in the years after 2007.
选项
答案
G
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ScF7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Hislectureoneducationreceiveswideattention.B、Hisexpressivenessmakesthelectureagreatsuccess.C、Hisideasleadto
Morethan100000internationalstudentswillspendthissummerworkingandtravelingintheUnitedStates.They【B1】_____theSum
Morethan100000internationalstudentswillspendthissummerworkingandtravelingintheUnitedStates.They【B1】_____theSum
Childrenwhosemindswandermighthavesharperbrains,researchsuggests.Astudyhasfoundthatpeoplewhoappeartobeconstan
Childrenwhosemindswandermighthavesharperbrains,researchsuggests.Astudyhasfoundthatpeoplewhoappeartobeconstan
Almosteveryonewantstopredictthefuturesothattheycanhavelessregretsandmoreachievements.It’simpossibletoknowth
Notgettingenoughsleepdoesn’tjustmakeyoutired.Italsomakesyoufatbecauseofincreasedfood-eating,accordingtoresea
Themostwell-knownportraitofawomanintheworldisoverthemoonliterally.RecentlyNASAmanagedto【B1】______animageoft
A、HestartedoutinOttawa.B、HesawCanadianColumbia.C、HemetDashan’smother.D、Hehadagoodtime.D旅行交通类。事实细节题。对话中女士请男士谈谈他
A、Becausetheyweredrivenbysteampower.B、Becausetheydidtheworkanimalsusedtodo.C、Becausetheypulledcarsfullofco
随机试题
社会基本矛盾是()。
男性,48岁,有风湿性关节炎病史15年,近5年出现呼吸困难、咳嗽和咯血等症状,并伴有肝大,腹水,双下肢水肿。查体心尖区可闻及隆隆样舒张期杂音。心电图示右室大。为明确诊断可靠的辅助检查是
患者,女,38岁。近3个月乳房胀痛,每逢月经来潮前乳房疼痛加重,两胁胀痛,心烦不寐,舌红,苔薄白,脉细涩。X线:双侧乳腺内弥漫性棉絮状结节影,边界不清。该患者的治法是
A.全血B.洗涤红细胞C.血小板制剂D.血清蛋白E.浓缩白细胞多次输血的贫血病人输血时用
公路工程质量监督,是指依据有关法律、法规、规章、技术标准和规范,对公路工程质量进行监督的行政行为。为加强公路工程质量监督,保证公路工程质量,保护人民生命和财产安全,《公路工程质量监督规定》明确了公路工程质量监督主要包括的内容、交通主管部门对公路工程质量监督
案例六:于先生是一家公司的业务经理,年薪10万,他打算把一部分资金投资在股票和债券上,但由于缺少专业知识,他想去咨询一下理财规划师。根据案例六,回答下列问题:于先生想了解交易所债券市场的交易规则,下列说法中不正确的是( )。
看见游客欲跨入景区禁止踩踏的草坪,导游人员忙上前笑着说:“小心!再往前一步,真理成错误!”这种提醒属于幽默式提醒。()
竞争性国有企业
在世界范围内,法人设立采用的一般原则是()。
有下面事件过程:PrivateSubCommandlClick()a=5b=8Fork=1To30c=b-aa=bb=cNextkPrintc
最新回复
(
0
)