首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack ea
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack ea
admin
2016-01-30
48
问题
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack each other — hurl insults, even — and it counts as logical argument. I cannot understand it. It seems that our society favors a kind of ritualized aggression. Everywhere you look, in newspapers and on television, issues are presented using the terminology of war and conflict. We hear of battles, duels and disputes. We see things in terms of winners and losers, victors and victims. The problem is society’s unquestioning belief in the advantages of the debate as a way of solving disagreements, even proving right from wrong.
Our brainwashing begins early at school, when the brightest pupils are co-opted onto the debating system. They get there because they can think up a good argument to support their case. Once on the debate team, they learn that they earn bonus points for the skill with which they verbally attack, or insult, the opposing team. They win if they can successfully convince the audience that they are right, even if the case they are arguing is clearly consensual. They do this by proving themselves to be stronger, brighter, more outrageous, even. The training in this adversarial approach continues at our tertiary institutions. The standard way to present an academic paper, for instance, is to take up an opposing argument to something expressed by another academic. The paper must set out to prove the other person wrong. This is not at all the same thing as reading the original paper with an open mind and discovering that you disagree with it.
The reverence for the adversarial approach spills over into all areas of life. Instead of answering their critics, politicians learn to sidestep negative comments and turn the point around to an attack on accusers. Defense lawyers argue the case for their clients even when they suspect they may be guilty. And ordinary people use the same tactics — just listen to your teenager next time you pull him up for coming home late. You can be sure a stream of abuse will flow about your own time — keeping, your irritating habits, your history of bad parenting.
Unfortunately, the smarter your kid, the better his or her argument against you will be. You’ll be upset, but you’ll comfort yourself that those teenage monsters of yours will one day turn into mature, though adults who can look after themselves — by which you mean, of course, they will be able to argue their way out of sticky situations.
It’s not that you should never use angry words, or take up a position in opposition to someone or something. There are certainly times when one should take a stand, and in such cases strong words are quite appropriate; if you witness injustice, for instance, or feel passionately about another’s folly. Mockery — so cruel when practiced on the innocent — can be very useful in such situations. There is no better way to bring down a tyrant than to mock him mercilessly.
What I dislike is the automatic assumption most people have when it comes to disagreements: they should attack, abuse, preferably overpower their opponent, at whatever the cost. The approach is to so ingrained that "compromise" has become a dirty word. We feel quality if we are conciliatory rather than confrontational. We have trained ourselves, or been brainwashed into believing, that to be pleasant is a sign of weakness.
But just think how easy it can be to persuade a "difficult" person to be considerate of you or your wished when you are pleasant to them, and unthreatening. Give them a way out of a potentially aggressive situation without losing face, and they will oblige you willingly.
Discuss a subject without taking an adversarial position and you will find the other person happy to explore the possibilities with you. I ’m prepared to bet on it. You’ll get closer to the truth of the matter than you would by going to each other hammer and tongs.
The author thinks that harsh words are appropriate in the following situations EXCEPT
选项
A、when you see something unfair
B、when you are annoyed at someone’s extremely foolish behavior
C、when you are enough with an arrogant person
D、when you are in disagreement with your colleagues
答案
D
解析
细节判断题。根据关键词harsh words定位到原文第五段第二句中的冒号后和尾句,这两处表明了在witness injustice,feel passionately about another’s folly和bring down a tyrant than to mock himmercilessly情况下可以使用harsh words,对照选项,只有选项D不属于其中的情况。故答案为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ShGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Ihavefeltforalongtimethataidtounderdevelopedcountriesshouldbeplacedinadefiniteandmorerationalorderofprior
Thegovernment’spoliciesinthepastfiveyearshaveshowna(n)______inemphasizingthenecessityofimprovingthepeasants’li
(复旦大学2009年试题)Hereisagreatironyof21st-centuryglobalpublichealth;Whilemanyhundredsofmillionsofpeoplelackade
(复旦大学2010年试题)Businessandgovernmentleadersconsidertheinflationratetobeanimportantgeneralindicator.Inflationis
(上海理工大学2006年试题)Inatelephonesurveyofmorethan2,000adults,21%saidtheybelievedthesunrevolved(旋转)aroundtheearth
(浙江大学2008年试题)Theenergycrisis,whichisbeingfeltaroundtheworld,hasdramatizedhowthecarelessuseoftheearth’sre
AreweatthebeginningofanotherAgeofExploration?Perhapsevenmoreimportant,areweatthebeginningof【C1】______AgeofC
Fewnaturaldangersaremorefearedthanavalanches.AvalanchesareafamiliarpartofEuropeanhistory.ParticularlyintheSwi
Theideaofhumanoidrobotsisnotnew.TheyhavebeenpartoftheimaginativelandscapeeversinceKarlCapek,aCzechwriter,
Livinginpoverty,Johnsoldfor500dollarsthe_______ofhismother’sfirstworkwhichmadeherfamous.
随机试题
①春天必然曾经是这样的。在《诗经》之前,在《尚书》之前,在仓颉造字之前,一只吃草的小羊猛然感到草的多汁,一个放风筝的孩子猛然感到风筝的飞腾,一位患风痛的老人猛然感到腿的舒活,一位溪畔浣纱的女子猛然感到手的温润……人们不由自主地将嘴噘成吹口哨的形状,惊喜地奔
A.激活凝血因子Ⅻ而引起DIC B.大量组织因子入血引起DIC C.血小板聚集、释放而引起DIC D.RBC大量破坏引起DIC E.其他促凝物质入血引起DIC高热的患者是通过
胸骨颈静脉切迹相当于
下列哪项可作为原发性高血压和肾性高血压的主要区别
根据《建筑地基基础设计规范》的规定,用该规范的地基承载力公式确定地基承载力特征值时需要满足下列()项条件。
“没有规矩不成方圆”,因此在组织和培养班集体时应()。
甲公司委托乙公司开发一种浓缩茶汁的技术秘密成果,未约定成果使用权、转让权以及利益分配办法。甲公司按约定支付了研究开发费用。乙公司按约定时间开发出该技术秘密成果后,在没有向甲公司交付之前,将其转让给丙公司。下列说法正确的是
用泰勒公式确定下列无穷小量当χ→0时关于χ的无穷小阶数:(Ⅰ)(Ⅱ)∫0χ(et-1-t)2dt.
在考生文件夹下存在一个数据库文件“samp2.accdb”,里面已经设计好表对象“tStudd”“tCourse”“tScore”和“tTemp”。试按以下要求完成设计:(1)创建一个查询,当运行该查询时,应显示参数提示信息“请输入爱好”,输入爱
Themaindifferencebetweencordlessphonesandcellphonesisthatcordlessphonescanonlyoperateinalimitedrange.Because
最新回复
(
0
)