首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it,
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it,
admin
2017-07-31
46
问题
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it, and see that it is hard and green. You take up another one, and that, too, is hard, green, and sour. The shopman offers you a third; but, before biting it, you examine it, and find that it is hard and green, and you immediately say that you will not have it, as it must be sour, like those that you have already tried.
Nothing can be more simple than that, you think; but if you will take the trouble to analyze and trace out into its logical elements what has been done by the mind, you will be greatly surprised. In the first place you have performed the operation of induction. You find that, in two experiences, hardness and greenness in apples went together with sourness. It was so in the first case, and it was confirmed by the second. True, it is a very small basis, but still it is enough from which to make an induction; you generalize the facts, and you expect to find sourness in apples where you get hardness and greenness. You found upon that a general law, that all hard and green apples are sour; and that, so far as it goes, is a perfect induction. Well, having got your natural law in this way, when you are offered another apple which you find it hard and green, you say, "all hard and green apples are sour; this apple is hard and green; therefore, this apple is sour." That train of reasoning is what logicians call a syllogism, and has all its various parts and terms — its major premises, its minor premises, and its conclusion. And by the help of further reasoning, which, if drawn out, would have to be exhibited in two or three other syllogisms, you arrive at your final determination, "I will not have that apple. " So that, you see, you have, in the first place, established a law by induction, and upon that you have founded a deduction, and reasoned out the special particular case.
Well now, suppose, having got your conclusion of the law, that at some times afterwards, you are discussing the qualities of apple with a friend; you will say to him, "It is a very curious thing, but I find that all hard and green apples are sour!" Your friend says to you, "But how do you know that?" You at once reply, "Oh, because I have tried them over and over again, and have always found them to be so." Well, if we are talking science instead of common sense, we should call that an experimental verification. And, if still opposed, you go further, and say, "I have heard from people, in Somerset shire and Devon shire, where a large number of apples are grown, and in London, where many apples are sold and eaten, that they have observed the same thing." It is also found to be the case in Normandy, and in North America. In short, I find it to be the universal experience of mankind wherever attention has been directed to the subject. Whereupon, your friend, unless he is a very unreasonable man, agrees with you, and is convinced that you are quite right in the conclusion you have drawn. He believes, although perhaps he does not know he believes it, that the more extensive verifications have been made, and results of the same kind arrived at—that the more varied the conditions under which the same results are attained, the more certain is the ultimate conclusion, and he disputes the question no further. He sees that the experiment has been tried under all sorts of conditions, as to time, place, and people, with the same result; and he says with you, therefore, that the law you have laid down must be a good one, and he must believe it.
If you find a hard and green apple that is not sour, you should______.
选项
A、try more apples to see if the natural law has changed
B、eat the rest of the apple at once
C、reject the law stating that hard and green apples are usually sour
D、conduct further investigations and make adjustments to the law of apples as necessary
答案
D
解析
本题的目的是让读者理解上下文,搞清演绎法的含义。四个选项中B和C明显错误。D项比A项更为全面,因此D项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SvFO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
TheBritishgovernmenthasdecidedtowipeouttheobesityepidemicthroughanovelstrategy-byofferingfatpeoplecashincenti
ForthepeoplewhohavenevertraveledacrosstheAtlanticthevoyageisafantasy.Butforthepeoplewhocrossitfrequentlyo
democracyimaginationdifferentflexibilityovercomeonlineoffertraditionalmodern
democracyimaginationdifferentflexibilityovercomeonlineoffertraditionalmodern
democracyimaginationdifferentflexibilityovercomeonlineoffertraditionalmodern
Whenitcomestotheslowingeconomy,EllenSperoisn’tbitinghernailsjustyet.Butthe47-year-oldmanicuristisn’tcutting,
Supposeyougointoafruiterer’sshop,wantinganapple-youtakeupone,andonbitingityoufinditissour;youlookatit,
Doweneedlawsthatpreventusfromrunningriskswithourlives?Ifso,thenperhapslawsareneededprohibitingthesaleofc
随机试题
《关于信托的法律适用及其承认的公约》订立于1985年的()
A.黏滞阻力B.惯性阻力C.气道阻力D.肺弹性阻力E.胸廓弹性阻力肺泡液一气界面的表面张力属于
65岁妇女,绝经15年,近半年阴道流血性分泌物,量中等,间断有少量阴道流血,妇查:阴道呈漏斗型,宫颈呈溃疡状,触痛(+),子宫小、固定,双侧宫旁呈团饼状增厚,质硬,达盆壁,锁骨上淋色结(-)患者治疗后半年,出现左腿痛,肿胀,伴腰骶部疼痛,同时合并尿少
消化性溃疡合并上消化道出血时的首选检查是
女性,51岁,牙龈增生影响咀嚼1年。检查见全口牙龈肥大增生,覆盖牙面约1/2.结节状。探诊时有出血,个别牙龈增生严重处牙齿有移位。为了有助于诊断.最应注意询问的病史为
对某项目进行单因素敏感性分析。当单位产品价格为1500元时,财务内部收益率为23%;当单位产品价格为1080元时,财务内部收益率为18%;当单位产品价格为950元时,财务内部收益率为10%;当单位产品价格为700元时,财务内部收益率为-8%。若基准收益率为
旅行社资产的构成特点主要有()。
企业生产车间发生的固定资产修理费用等后续支出,不符合固定资产确认条件的,应当在发生时计入当期的制造费用。()
十九大报告指出,要在全面建成小康社会的基础上,分()在本世纪中叶建成()的社会主义现代化强国。
算法的有穷性是指
最新回复
(
0
)