首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Serious Risks of Rushing New Teacher Evaluation Systems A)One of the primary policy reforms now being employed in states and
The Serious Risks of Rushing New Teacher Evaluation Systems A)One of the primary policy reforms now being employed in states and
admin
2015-07-31
28
问题
The Serious Risks of Rushing New Teacher Evaluation Systems
A)One of the primary policy reforms now being employed in states and districts nationwide is teacher evaluation reform. Well-designed evaluations, which should include measures that capture both teacher practice and student learning, have great potential to inform and improve the performance of teachers and, thus, students. Furthermore, most everyone agrees that the previous systems were not really practical, failed to provide useful feedback, and needed replacement.
B)The attitude among many policymakers and advocates is that we must implement these systems and begin using them rapidly for decisions about teachers, while design flaws can be fixed later. However, we believe this attitude to be unwise. The risks of excessive haste are likely higher than whatever opportunity costs would be brought forth by proceeding more cautiously. Moving too quickly gives policymakers and educators less time to devise and test the new systems, and to become familiar with how they work and the results they provide.
C)Moreover, careless rushing may result in avoidable erroneous high-stakes decisions about individual teachers. Such decisions are harmful to the profession, they threaten the credibility of the evaluations, and they may well promote widespread resistance.
D)Finally, we must not underestimate the costs, financial and otherwise, of making large changes to these systems once they are in place. A perfect example is No Child Left Behind— it had many obvious design flaws that were known early on, but few of these have been corrected, even in states’ NCLB "flexibility" applications.
E)In short, given these risks and the difficulty of fairly and accurately measuring teacher effectiveness, it seems short-sighted to rush into full-blown implementation without ensuring that the new systems are up to the task.
F)To that end, we would like to highlight four issues to which states and districts must pay attention in the short term. The first is that the details of the evaluations, some of which may seem insignificant, in fact matter tremendously. Important choices include(but are not limited to): selecting measures, particularly for teachers in non-tested grades and subjects; reporting evaluation results to educators in a manner that is useful to their practice; ensuring accuracy in state data systems; choosing cut scores(if desired)to separate more and less effective educators; and designing scoring systems that preserve each measure’s intended importance, or "weight". All of these decisions are important, but even a quick glance of states’ new evaluation policies under the waivers(弃权,放弃)or Race to the Top highlights many decisions that contradict what little we know about effective teacher evaluation systems.
G)And, as is often the case with new policies, the flow of research in this area lags far behind the risky pace of policy making. For instance, a large number of states have chosen as their growth models for teacher evaluation a variant on what’s commonly called the "student growth percentile"(SGP)model. However, recent evidence suggests that value-added models can do a better job of leveling the playing field across classes. Similarly, the Measures of Effective Teaching project offered useful guidance for designing evaluation systems, but its results were released after many states and districts had already made these decisions.
H)A second issue is simple bad timing: The implementation of the Common Core standards and new Core-aligned assessments creates serious complications for new teacher evaluation systems. Perhaps the most important of these is that curriculum, standards, and assessments are not yet in sync(同步的,协调的). New York has recently experienced this issue, administering new assessments before teachers have been supported to implement the Common Core through curriculum materials. And, while the stated hope is that the tests, curricula, and standards will perfectly come into adjustment in a few years, if history is any guide this is far from guaranteed.
I)Doing evaluation reform and Common Core implementation at the same time may well be too much for states, districts, and schools to handle. Furthermore, evaluating teachers on the basis of tests that are not in line with what they are supposed to be teaching is a fundamentally invalid use of those data.
J)The third issue is the need for states to avoid being overly prescriptive. Most notably, many schools and districts have well established evaluation systems already in place, and it makes little sense to do away with these systems and force a state-enforced model. Similarly, districts should be given room to experiment with system design and with different ways to use the results for personnel decisions. The state’s optimal role may be to enforce a minimum standard for teacher evaluation, rather than enforcing a particular evaluation model statewide.
K)Fourth and finally, new evaluations—as with any major policy—require significant time and resources to plan and experiment, and there must be substantial capacity building for educators to understand and carry out these systems. Policies should not move directly from the drawing board to high-stakes(高风险的)implementation if the goal is to bring the policies’ effectiveness into full play and minimizing(最小化)their negative unintended consequences. We recommend that schools and districts should have a year for planning and two years of implementation prior to tying ratings to high stakes decisions.
L)We conclude where we began—as two individuals who believe that improved teacher evaluation systems could indeed help elevate teaching and learning in US schools. We are concerned that the overly quick, insufficiently careful manner in which many new systems are being installed threatens their likelihood of success.
M)Put simply, we need to slow down and work to create the best systems possible. Schools and districts in the middle of the design and implementation process should focus on the details of their systems and partner with researchers and other sites to study system effectiveness. In those places where evaluations are already in force, we would strongly advise policymakers to take a step back and consider our suggestions.
N)And, no matter the situation, high-stakes decisions about teachers should not be made on the basis of assessment data collected during Common Core implementation. Doing so is unfair and inappropriate and may cause serious harm.
From the perspective of the author, it wouldn’t be wise for policymakers and advocates to implement the teacher evaluation reform rapidly.
选项
答案
B
解析
细节归纳题。定位句讲述了一些政策制定者和倡导者积极推动教师评估体制改革,并且迅速地实施,但是作者认为这样做是不明智的。题干是对定位句的概括,故选B)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Swl7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Ifyou’velivedforlonginNewYorkCity,chancesareyou’velivedinseveraldifferentplaces.Onthemapofwherewelivenow
Ifyou’velivedforlonginNewYorkCity,chancesareyou’velivedinseveraldifferentplaces.Onthemapofwherewelivenow
A、Itisveryrichinculture.B、Itsweatherispleasant.C、It’squietandnatural.D、Itisverydeveloped.C对话中男士提到撒丁岛是他见过的最安静、破
A、Bypersuadingpeopletobuyalotofthingsinthesalespromotion.B、Bypublicizingproductswithbeautifulbutuselesspacka
A、Shehasalreadyseenthefilm.B、Thefilmisverygood.C、Sheisinterestedinseeingthefilm.D、Mostofherclassmatesthink
A、Theyliketolistentotherecordagainandagain.B、Theyarehappysheplaysadifferentsongthistime.C、Thissongisalway
A、Ecologists.B、Industrialists.C、Businessmen.D、Environmentalists.B短文最后提到,自然资源保护论者认为应限制技术的增长,由此可推断出,industrialists(工业家、实业家)极有可
Almosteverychild,onthefirstdayhesetsfootinaschoolbuilding,issmarter,more【B1】______,lessafraidofwhathedoesn
Whatdodietingandenergypolicyhaveincommon?TheSnackWelleffect.Thenamecomesfromthosetastylittlecookiesthatare【
随机试题
属于中效的糖皮质激素类药物是:
以下可提出行政复议的有()。
煤矿许用电雷管也称为安全电雷管,煤矿许用毫秒延时电雷管的最高段别是()。
某基础工程合同价为2000万元,合同总工期为20个月,施工过程中因设计变更,导致增加额外工程400万元,业主同意工期顺延。则承包商按造价比例法可索赔工期()个月。
在下列股利分配政策中,能使企业保持理想的资本结构,使加权平均资本成本最低,并实现企业价值最大化的是()。
某投资项目在建设起点一次性投资50916元,当年完工并投产,投产后每年可获现金净流量10000元,寿命为15年,其内含报酬率为()。
甲企业为增值税一般纳税人,适用增值税税率为17%,原材料按实际成本核算,2015年12月初,A材料账面余额90000元。该企业12月份发生的有关经济业务如下:(1)5日,购入A材料1000千克,增值税专用发票上注明的价款为300000元,增值税税额为
下列属于宪法中规定的国家机构的是()。
[*]
ABiologicalClockEverylivingthinghaswhatscientistscallabiologicalclockthatcontrolsbehavior.Thebiologicalcloc
最新回复
(
0
)