首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Trust Me, I’m a Robot [A]With robots now emerging from their industrial cages and moving into homes and workplaces, roboticists
Trust Me, I’m a Robot [A]With robots now emerging from their industrial cages and moving into homes and workplaces, roboticists
admin
2019-09-18
61
问题
Trust Me, I’m a Robot
[A]With robots now emerging from their industrial cages and moving into homes and workplaces, roboticists are concerned about the safely implications beyond the factory floor. To address these concerns, leading robot experts have come together to try to find ways to prevent robots from harming people. Inspired by the Pugwash Conferences—an international group of scientists, academics and activists founded in 1957 to campaign for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons—the new group of robo-ethicists met earlier this year in Genoa, Italy, and announced their initial findings in March at the European Robotics Symposium in Palermo, Sicily.
[B]"Security and safety are the big concerns," says Henrik Christensen, chairman of the European Robotics Network at the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. Should robots that are strong enough or heavy enough to crush people be allowed into homes? Is "system malfunction" a justifiable defence for a robotic fighter plane that contravenes(违反)the Geneva Convention and mistakenly fires on innocent civilians?
[C]"These questions may seem hard to understand but in the next few years they will become increasingly relevant," says Dr. Christensen. According to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe’s World Robotics Survey, in 2002 the number of domestic and service robots more than tripled, nearly surpassing their industrial counterparts. By the end of 2003 there were more than 600,000 robot vacuum cleaners and lawn mowers—a figure predicted to rise to more than 4m by the end of next year. Japanese industrial firms are racing to build humanoid robots to act as domestic helpers for the elderly, and South Korea has set a goal that 100% of households should have domestic robots by 2020. In light of all this, it is crucial that we start to think about safety guidelines now, says Dr. Christensen Stop right there
[D]So what exactly is being done to protect us from these mechanical menaces? "Not enough," says Blay Whitby. This is hardly surprising given that the field of "safety-critical computing" is barely a decade old, he says. But things are changing, and researchers are increasingly taking an interest in trying to make robots safer. One approach, which sounds simple enough, is try to program them to avoid contact with people altogether. But this is much harder than it sounds. Getting a robot to navigate across a cluttered room is difficult enough without having to take into account what its various limbs or appendages might bump into along the way.
[E]"Regulating the behaviour of robots is going to become more difficult in the future, since they will increasingly have self-learning mechanisms built into them," says Gianmarco Veruggio. "As a result, their behaviour will become impossible to predict fully," he says, "since they will not be behaving in predefined ways but will learn new behaviour as they go."
[F]Then there is the question of unpredictable failures. What happens if a robot’s motors stop working, or it suffers a system failure just as it is performing heart surgery or handing you a cup of hot coffee? You can, of course, build in redundancy by adding backup systems, says Hirochika Inoue. But this guarantees nothing, he says. "One hundred per cent safety is impossible through technology," says Dr. Inoue. This is because ultimately no matter how thorough you are, you cannot anticipate the unpredictable nature of human behaviour, he says. Or to put it another way, no matter how sophisticated your robot is at avoiding people, people might not always manage to avoid it, and could end up tripping over it and falling down the stairs.
Legal problems
[G]In any case, says Dr. Inoue, the laws really just summarize commonsense principles that are already applied to the design of most modern appliances, both domestic and industrial. Every toaster, lawn mower and mobile phone is designed to minimize the risk of causing injury—yet people still manage to electrocute(电死)themselves, lose fingers or fall out of windows in an effort to get a better signal. At the very least, robots must meet the rigorous safety standards that cover existing products. The question is whether new, robot-specific rules are needed—and, if so, what they should say.
[H]"Making sure robots are safe will be critical," says Colin Angle of iRobot, which has sold over 2m "Roomba" household-vacuuming robots. But he argues that his firm’s robots are, in fact, much safer than some popular toys. "A radio-controlled car controlled by a six-year old is far more dangerous than a Roomba," he says. If you tread on a Roomba, it will not cause you to slip over: instead, a rubber pad on its base grips the floor and prevents it from moving. "Existing regulations will address much of the challenge," says Mr. Angle. "I’m not yet convinced that robots are sufficiently different that they deserve special treatment."
[I]Robot safety is likely to surface in the civil courts as a matter of product liability. "When the first robot carpet-sweeper sucks up a baby, who will be to blame?" asks John Hallam, a professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. If a robot is autonomous and capable of learning, can its designer be held responsible for all its actions? Today the answer to these questions is generally "yes". But as robots grow in complexity it will become a lot less clear cut, he says.
[J]"Right now, no insurance company is prepared to insure robots," says Dr. Inoue. But that will have to change, he says. Last month, Japan’s Ministry of Trade and Industry announced a set of safety guidelines for home and office robots. They will be required to have sensors to help them avoid collisions with humans: to be made from soft and light materials to rninimize harm if a collision does occur: and to have an emergency shut-off button. This was largely prompted by a big robot exhibition held last summer, which made the authorities realize that there are safety implications when thousands of people are not just looking at robots, but mingling with them, says Dr. Inoue.
[K]However, the idea that general-purpose robots, capable of learning, will become widespread is wrong, suggests Mr. Angle. It is more likely, he believes, that robots will be relatively dumb machines designed for particular tasks. Rather than a humanoid robot maid, "it’s going to be a heterogeneous(不同种类的)swarm of robots that will take care of the house," he says.
It is pointed out there is no absolute safety through technology due to the unpredictable nature of human behavior.
选项
答案
F
解析
根据题目中unpredictable nature of human behavior定位至F段。该段后半部分提到井上广近博士的观点:靠技术保证百分之百的安全是不可能的,因为无论如何事无巨细地准备,人类的行为本身就是不可预测的。本题句子是对该段倒数第2、3句的概括。题目中的absolute对应原文的one hundred per cent。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/T3W7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Oncetheydecidedtohavechildren,MiShelandCarlMeissnertackledthenextbigissue:Shouldtheytrytohaveagirl?Itwas
Tsunamis[A]UpuntilDecemberof2004,thephenomenonoftsunamiwasnotonthemindsofmostoftheworld’spopulation.Thatc
Scatteredaroundtheglobearemorethan100smallregionsofisolatedvolcanicactivityknowntogeologistsashotspots.Unlik
Aristotledefinedafriendas"asinglesouldwellingintwobodies".MembersofFacebookwhose"friends"reachtriplefiguresm
A、Itiselaboratelydecorated.B、Ithassurvivedsome2,000years.C、Itisverybig,withonlysixslimlegs.D、Itisshapedlik
PeoplewhospendalotoftimesurfingtheInternetaremorelikelytoshowsignsofdepression,BritishscientistssaidonWedn
PeoplewhospendalotoftimesurfingtheInternetaremorelikelytoshowsignsofdepression,BritishscientistssaidonWedn
Ablindbabyisdoublyhandicapped.Notonlyisitunabletosee,butbecauseitcannotreceivethevisualstimulusfromitsenv
A、Trytoincreasetheemploymentrate.B、Trytomoveforwardonmarriageequality.C、Trytocarryonwiththeunfinishedbusines
DoBritain’sEnergyFirmsServethePublicInterest?[A]Capitalismisthebestandworstofsystems.Lefttoitself,itwillemb
随机试题
治疗风寒湿邪壅滞经络所致的痉证,可用()(2007年第142题)
A.肌内注射或静脉注射阿托品B.给氧,进行人工呼吸C.按需给予适宜的升压药和补液D.静脉注射适量的肌松药,并进行人工呼吸E.静脉输注葡萄糖阿片类镇痛药给药过程中如发生危象征兆应先给予的对症处理是呼吸抑制,应
下图为Excel2010中记录的某班英语成绩登记表,完成以下题目。用公式计算综合成绩,其中综合成绩=口语×20%+语法×20%+听力×30%+作文×30%。则F1单元格中应输入公式____,然后左键拖动F3单元格的填充柄到F8单元格即可。
对已上市药品的安全性、有效性和质量可控性定期开展上市后评价的是
张某创办个人独资企业的行为( )。市工商行政管理局的意见( )。
2012年6月1日,某市政府根据城市规划进行旧城改造,决定征收城区内某处固有土地上15万m2的房屋,其中有3万m2的房屋未登记,包括1.20万m2的违法建筑。依法选定甲房地产估价机构负责房屋征收评估工作。甲房地产估价机构资质等级可以为()。
从事城乡规划编制工作应当具备一定条件,并经省、自治区、直辖市人民政府城乡规划主管部门依法审查合格,取得相应等级的资质证书后,方可在资质等级许可的范围内从事城乡规划编制工作,其应具备的条件不包括()。
A施工单位于2009年5月承接某科研单位办公楼机电安装项目,合同约定保修期为一年。工程内容包括:给排水、电气、消防、通风空调、建筑智能系统。其中:办公楼实验中心采用一组(5台)模块式水冷机组作为冷热源,计算机中心采用10%余热回收水冷机组作为冷热源;空调供
设A是三阶矩阵,α1,α2,α3为三个三维线性无关的列向量,且满足Aα1=α2+α3,Aα2=α1+α3,Aα3=α1+α2.判断矩阵A可否对角化.
下列关于线性链表的描述中,正确的是()。Ⅰ、只含有一个指针域来存放下一个元素地址Ⅱ、指针域中的指针用于指向该结点的前一个或后一个结点(即前件或后件)Ⅲ、结点由两部分组成:数据域和指针域。
最新回复
(
0
)