首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Choice Myth Last week, The Washington Post ran a front-page story that said most stay-at-home moms aren’t SUV-driving, d
The Choice Myth Last week, The Washington Post ran a front-page story that said most stay-at-home moms aren’t SUV-driving, d
admin
2011-01-01
41
问题
The Choice Myth
Last week, The Washington Post ran a front-page story that said most stay-at-home moms aren’t SUV-driving, daily yoga-doing, latte-drinking white, upper-middle-class women who choose to leave their high-powered careers to answer the call to motherhood. Instead, they are disproportionately low-income, non-college educated, young and foreign-born; in other words, they are women whose horizons are greatly limited and for whom the cost of child care, very often, makes work not a workable choice at all.
These findings, drawn from a new report by the Census Bureau, really ought to lead us to reframe our public conversations about who mothers are and why they do what they do. It should lead us away from all the moralistic bombast(大话) about mothers’ "choices" and "priorities". It should get us thinking less about choice, in fact, and make us focus more on the objective conditions that drive women’s lives. And they should drive us to think about the choices that we as a society must make to guarantee that the best possible opportunities are available for all families.
The basic finding of this latest report—that the more choices mothers have, the more likely they are to work—has been known, to anyone who’s taken the time to seriously look into the issue, for quite some time now. Ever since 2003, when Lisa Belkin’s article in The Times Magazine about highly privileged and ultra-high-achieving moms—"The Opt-Out Revolution" —was generalized by the news media to claim that mothers overall were choosing to leave the work force in droves, researchers have been revisiting the state of mothers employment and reaching very similar conclusions.
In 2005, the Motherhood Project at the Institute for American Values surveyed more than 2,000 women and published a report that said most mothers, given free choice in an ideal world, would choose to be employed—provided their employment didn’t impinge (侵占) excessively on their time with their kids. Approximately two-thirds said they’d ideally work part time or from home; only 16 percent said they’d prefer to work full-time. (Interestingly, the researchers said, it was the least-educated mothers who expressed the strongest preference for full-time work.)
In 2007, the sociologists David Cotter, Paula England and Joan Hermsen looked carefully at four decades of employment data and found that women with choices—those with college educations—were overwhelmingly choosing to stay in the work force. The only women "opting out" in any significant numbers were the very richest—those with husbands earning more than $125,000 a year—and the very poorest—those with husbands earning less than $23,400 a year.
You might say that the movement of the richest women out of the workforce proves that women will, in the best of all possible worlds, go home. But these women often have husbands who, in order to earn those top salaries, work 70 or 80 hours a week and travel extensively; someone has to he home. Many left high-powered careers that made similar demands on their time. They are privileged, it’s true, but very often they have also been cornered by the all-or-nothing non-choices of our workplaces.
The alternative narrative—of constricted horizons, not choice—that might have emerged from recent research has never really made it into the mainstream. It just can’t, it seems, find a foothold.
"The reason we keep getting this narrative is that there is this deep cultural conflict about mothers’ employment," England told me this week. "On the one hand, people believe women should have equal opportunities, but on the other hand, we don’t envision(展望) men taking on more child care and housework and, unlike Europe, we don’t seem to be able to envision family-friendly work policies. "
Why this matters—and why opening this topic up for discussion is important—is very clear: because our public policy continues to rest upon a fictitious idea, eternally recycled in the media, of mothers’ free choices, and not upon the constraints that truly drive their behavior. "If journalism repeatedly frames the wrong problem, then the folks who make public policy may very well deliver the wrong solution," is how E. J. Graff, the associate director and senior researcher at Brandeis University’s Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism once put it in the Columbia Journalism Review. "If women are happily choosing to stay home with their babies, that’s a private decision. But... it’s a public policy issue if schools, jobs and other American institutions are structured in ways that make it frustratingly difficult, and sometimes impossible, for parents to manage both their jobs and family responsibilities."
It looked, not so long ago, as though things were going to change. Barack Obama made increasing women’s work/life choices and providing more supports for working families a cornerstone of his campaign. All those lofty ideals, though, seem to have been forgotten in the realities of this recession, where plans to expand universal pre-K, paid family leave and subsidies for child care have gone the way of" state budget revenues. Even workfare, The Times reported this week, is being discarded in California in favor of old-style no-work welfare, because it’s been deemed too costly to give poor mothers job skills while providing decent child care.
In Fresno County, one of the first places in California where welfare recipients are being told about the policy change, which is voluntary for now, the new regulations aren’t being viewed as good news.
"Especially when you have kids, you can’t just sit around and collect checks," one mother told The Times. For now, 90 percent of beneficiaries in Fresno County are choosing to keep working and receiving child care subsidies.
When mothers can choose, they choose self-empowerment (自助自强). Because they know that there is no true difference between their advancement and the advancement of their children. Why do we so enduringly deny them the dignity of choice?
Increasing women’s work/life choices and providing more supports for working families is Barack Obama’s ______.
选项
答案
campaign cornerstone
解析
根据题干关键词Increasing work/life choices,Barack Obama定位到原文第十段第二句:Barack Obama made increasing women’s work/life choices and providing more supports for working families a cornerstone of his campaign. 可知在奥巴马竞选时,把这两项当作竞选的基石。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/T5y7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whenyoungpeoplegettheirrealjobs,theymayfacealotofnew,【B1】______situations.Theymayfindthateverythingisdiffere
Today’spolicemeninlargecitiesthroughouttheworld【C1】______onmodeminventionstohelpthemintheirwork.Inmostplacesm
Morethanfortythousandreaderstolduswhattheylookedforinclosefriendships,whattheyexpected【C1】______friends,whatt
A、Aletterofinvitation.B、Aletterofrecommendation.C、Aletterofcomplaint,D、Anapplicationletter.C推理判断题。对话开始男士就说给女士读一封信
A、It’stooexpensive.B、Theneighborhoodisnoisy.C、It’slocatedsomedistancefromschool.D、Itisn’tcozy.C该题的问题实际与对话中的问题wh
A、Theexamsthatshedoesn’tpass.B、Thetitlesofthetermpapersshewrote.C、Thereasonwhyherfamilydidn’ttravelanywhere
Thedifferencebetweenaliquidandagasisobvious【C1】______theconditionsoftemperatureandpressurecommonlyfound【C2】_____
Kitchendutiesmayhavetraditionallybeenviewedaswomen’swork,butnotattheWhiteHouse.Untilnow:CristetaComerfordha
A、sendthemagift.B、gotovisitthemagain.C、sendthemaletterorcallthem.D、nothing,waituntilthenextinvitation.A此题
Ithinkitisonlybya______ofimaginationthatyousayyouhaveseenaghost.
随机试题
一天,妈妈带着宣宣小朋友逛街,宣宣指着超市里的小汽车说:“妈妈我想要。”但家里已经有了很多的汽车玩具,于是妈妈拒绝了她。宣宣哇哇大哭,这个时候妈妈说:“宝贝,前面有非常好玩的淘气堡,我们去玩一会吧。”宣宣立马笑了起来。这体现了情绪调节的(
肾母细胞瘤最早出现的临床表现是()
下列哪些药物可以用高氯酸滴定液进行非水滴定
概算定额是编制初步设计概算和技术修正概算的依据。()
下面()不属于控制环境因素的范围。
下列关于新医学模式的理解,不正确的是()。
根据2010年第六次全国人口普查数据显示,东部地区中北京市常住人口为1961,24万人,上海市常住人口为2301.91万人;中部地区中河南省常住人口为9402.36万人,山西省常住人口为3571.21万人;西部地区中重庆市常住人口为2884.62万人,
A、 B、 C、 D、 AB项,右侧面的内部图形应为不与边相切的圆;C项右侧面两个小圆的方向应在另一条对角线上,D项中正面内切圆的横向半径线应指向右边。故本题选A。
EnglishasaGlobalLanguageI.EnglishisagloballanguageIt’swidelyusedineconomic,political,andscientificfields
你收到朋友小红的电子邮件,请参照以下内容回一封邮件给她。1.很高兴收到电子邮件,从中可以看出她的英语写作能力很不错,能用英语写一封流利的电子邮件。2.表示自己还达不到这样的水平,尤其是要解释某件事时。3.告诉对方自己的学校位于白云山
最新回复
(
0
)