首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
公务员
In the idealized version of how science is done,facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective rese
In the idealized version of how science is done,facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective rese
admin
2019-12-28
17
问题
In the idealized version of how science is done,facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work.But in the everyday practice of science,discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route.We aim to be objective,but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experiences.Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience,what we think our experiences mean,and the subsequent actions we take.Opportunities for misinterpretation,error,and self-deception abound.
Consequently,discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience.Similar to newly staked mining claims,they are full of potential.But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery.This is the credibility process,through which the individual researcher’s me,here,now becomes the community’s anyone,anywhere,anytime.Objective knowledge is the goal,not the starting point.
Once a discovery claim becomes public,the discoverer receives intellectual credit.But,unlike with mining claims,the community takes control of what happens next.Within the complex social
structure of the scientific community,researchers make discoveries;editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process;other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes;and finally,the public(including other scientists)receives the fiew discovery and possiblv accompanying technology.As a discovery claim works its way through the community,the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the techn010gY involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovenr.
Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process.First,scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect.Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed.The goal is new-search,not re-search.Not surprisingly,newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers.Second,novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief.Nobel Laureate and phvsiologist Albert once described discovery as“seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobodv has thought.”But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views.Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.
In the end,credibility“happens”to a discovery claim—a process that corresponds to what philosopher
Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind.“We reason together,challenge,
revise,and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions 0f reason.”
请回答下列问题。
Which of the following would be the best title of the text?
选项
A、Novelty as an Engine of Scientific Development
B、Collective Scrutiny in Scientific Discovery
C、Evolution of Credibility in Doing Science
D、Challenge to Credibility at the Gate to Science
答案
C
解析
主旨题。从整篇文章脉络来看,文章第一段指出任何发现最终的目标是将它客观化,但是这个过程多多少少会受到环境和背景的影响;第二段写到这个过程需要公众共同的努力;第三段具体论述了不同的角色在这个过程中需要完成的工作;第四段则提出了使科学发现获得可信度的过程中所遇到的两个矛盾;最后一段作者用Annette Baier的一句话总结了这个过程。由此可知,全文都围绕科学发现的“取信过程”(即可信度从无到有的发展过程)展开论述,故C项“科学研究中可信度的发展”为正确答案。A项“新颖是科学发展的引擎”与原文不符。B项“科学发现中的集体审查”以偏概全。D项“科学人门处对可信度的质疑”只是对第四段的概括,也不能代表全文。故本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TBjY777K
本试题收录于:
银保监财会类题库国家公务员分类
0
银保监财会类
国家公务员
相关试题推荐
PM2.5是指大气中直径小于或等于2.5微米的颗粒物,它的直径还不到人的头发丝粗细的1/20。虽然PM2.5只是地球大气成分中含量很少的成分,但它富含大量的有毒、有害物质且在大气中的停留时间长、输送距离远,因而对人体健康和大气环境质量的影响更大。根据以上内
搬运站运送500只玻璃瓶,商定每只运费是0.24元,如果打破一只,不但不给运费,而且还要赔偿1.26元,结果搬运站共得运费115.50元,搬运中打破了()只玻璃瓶。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性。
以下变化使事物性质发生改变的是:
随着社会的发展。每个明星都可以看成一个品牌。而品牌在塑造过程中会遇到来自各方面原因引起的危机,特别是作为公众人物的明星,一举一动都受到媒体和公众的注视。而明星品牌危机的主要来源包括以下几方面:代言的产品质量问题、出席了引起公众反感的活动、出演了与自身品牌不
心理记账是人们在心理上对结果进行分类、编码、估价和预算等的过程。消费者在决策时可能根据不同的任务进行相应的心理记账。根据上述定义,下列不属于典型的心理记账的是:
近些年,海外代购成为国人较为青睐的购物方式,代购的销售量和收益在迅速增长,其中商品的来源大多是日本和韩国。代购者从海外购买相应产品,通过旅游、海外探亲等渠道避开关税,卖给内地顾客从中收益,而政府也就损失了这部分的税收收入。专家指出政府应当严厉打击和限制这种
王某是房管局的一名工作人员,房地产企业甲公司为了在办事时受到关照,公司经理谢某通过不同的途径送给王某名贵玉石4件、人民币现金30万元。根据相关法律,王某的行为构成了:
求助者有两种求助动机:执行性求助和工具性求助。前者是自己不做任何尝试或努力,只想知道答案或让他人代自己完成任务;后者是借助其他人的力量以达到自己解决问题或实现目标的目的。根据上述定义,下列属于工具性求助的是:
Intheidealizedversionofhowscienceisdone,factsabouttheworldarewaitingtobeobservedandcollectedbyobjectiverese
随机试题
小柴胡汤与大柴胡汤中均含有的是
患者男,43岁,回吸鼻涕带血2个月余。若鼻咽部MRI示:右侧鼻咽部软组织增厚,咽隐窝不对称,右侧颈部多个淋巴结肿大,最大者3cm×3cm,关于该患者下列叙述正确的是
从我国领域外寄交或者托交的授权委托书,应当经所在国公证机关证明。并履行下列哪种法定程序,才具有效力?()
根据《治安管理处罚法》的规定,违反治安管理行为在()内公安机关没有发现的,不再处罚。
阐述布洛卡区、威尔尼克区和角回的位置以及它们在言语活动中的作用。
Ourdreamswillsometimesbe______andouretherealhopesblasted.
America’seconomicrecoveryremainsuncomfortablyweak.Thelatestdatashowindustrialproductionfallingwhilethetradedefic
(263)不属于沟通管理的范畴。
防火墙的设计策略包括网络策略和【 】策略。
函数pi的功能是根据以下近似公式求π值:(π*π)/6=1+1/(2*2)+1/(3*3)+…+1(n*n)现在请你在下面的函数中填空,完成求π的功能。#include"math.h"{doubles=0.0;
最新回复
(
0
)