首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Among the most enduring of all horrors is the prospect of a slow, painful death. Those who witness the protracted terminal illne
Among the most enduring of all horrors is the prospect of a slow, painful death. Those who witness the protracted terminal illne
admin
2016-10-24
47
问题
Among the most enduring of all horrors is the prospect of a slow, painful death. Those who witness the protracted terminal illness of a friend or relative often view the eventual death more as a relief than a tragedy.
But to make life or death decisions on behalf of a dying person unable to communicate his or her wishes is to enter a moral and legal minefield. Could a doctor be sued for withholding treatment and allowing someone to die—or for not allowing him or her to die? Could it ever be lawful to withhold food and water?
Legal moves are afoot which may settle these questions. Recently, a group on voluntary euthanasia proposed legislation to make documents known as "Advance Directives", or Living Wills, legally binding.
An Advance Directive sets out the kind of medical treatment a person wishes to receive, or not receive, should he or she ever be in a condition that prevents them expressing those wishes. Such documents, much in vogue in the US and some EU countries, are becoming increasingly popular in Britain.
A clear distinction must be drawn between actions requested by an Advance Directive, and active euthanasia, or "mercy killing". A doctor who took a positive step—such as giving a lethal injection—to help a patient die would, as the law stands, be guilty of murder or aiding and abetting suicide, depending on the circumstances.
An Advance Directive, however, requests only passive euthanasia: the withholding of medical treatment aimed solely at sustaining the life of a patient who is terminally ill or a vegetable(in a vegetative state). The definition of medical treatment, in such circumstances, can include food and water.
The enforceability of the Advance Directive stems from the notion, long accepted in English law, that a person who is both old enough to make an informed decision and composmentis, is entitled to refuse any medical treatment offered by a doctor, even if that refusal leads to the person’s death. A doctor who forces treatment on a patient against his or her wishes is, therefore, guilty of an assault. Case law exists in the US and several EU countries that extend this right of autonomy over one’s life to patients who write an Advance Directive refusing treatment and subsequently lose their reason. There is no reason, based on public policy or English case law, why an English court should treat previously made instructions any differently.
Which of the following best summarizes the author’s attitude toward the Advance Directive?
选项
A、It should be made legally binding in Britain.
B、It is morally questionable.
C、It is the same as mercy killing, and therefore should not be encouraged.
D、It runs counter to traditional English law.
答案
A
解析
以下哪种陈述最恰当地概括作者对事先指示的态度?应该让事先指示在英国具有法律约束力。根据第三段第二句,最近,一个主张自愿安乐死的团体建议立法,使“事先指示”或活遗嘱具有法律约束力。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TCGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
AstheEnglishlanguagehaschangedatafastspeedinthelastcentury,sohastheuseoftheEnglishlanguage.AftertheB
Mrs.Blackfindsthatherpianohasalwayshadthemagicpoweroftakingherawayfromthegrimrealitiesofdailylifeand_____
Readingbooksisahabitthatispopularly【C1】______bymoreandmorepeople.Itbenefitsourlivesbyimprovingourknowledgeto
Readingbooksisahabitthatispopularly【C1】______bymoreandmorepeople.Itbenefitsourlivesbyimprovingourknowledgeto
Someteachers______theirstudents’poorperformancepartiallytoalackofintelligence.
Ifoundthesubjectverydifficult,andatonetimethoughtIshouldhavetogiveitup,butyoudirectionsaresoclearand____
Americansoftensaythatthereareonlytwothingsapersoncanbesureofinlife:deathandtaxes.Americansdonothaveacor
Americansoftensaythatthereareonlytwothingsapersoncanbesureofinlife:deathandtaxes.Americansdonothaveacor
Crisiswouldbetherighttermtodescribethe______inmanyanimalspecies.
PeopleintheUnitedStatesinthenineteenthcenturywerehauntedbytheprospectthatunprecedentedchangeinthenation’seco
随机试题
某国土资源管理部门根据村民王某报上的材料,在未进行实地勘测的情况下,为其办理了集体土地使用证。不久,国土资源管理部门接到举报,称王某占用耕地建房。国土资源管理部门现场调查后,发现举报属实,拟对王某作出拆除房屋并复垦的行政处罚。王某认为用地都已经在上报的材料
下列导致委托代理关系终止的原因,正确的有()。
案例一【背景资料】某施工单位承建城镇道路改扩建工程,全长2km,工程项目主要包括:(1)原机动车道的旧水泥混凝土路面加铺沥青混凝土面层;(2)原机动车道两侧加宽、新建非机动车道和人行道;(3)新建人行天桥一座,人行天桥桩基共设计12根,为人工
根据《跟单信用证统一惯例》规定,若信用证中对是否分批装运与转运未予规定,则受益人()。
市场营销思考问题的出发点是()。
某上市公司拟进行重大资产重组,根据证券法律制度的规定,下列情形中,应当提交并购重组委审核的有()。
2015年1月1日,A公司库存A型机器5台,已计提存货跌价准备0.4万元。2015年2月1日,A公司对外销售期初库存A型机器5台。2015年12月31日已生产并形成库存A型机器12台,单位成本为30万元。A公司已就该批A型机器与B公司签订了销售合同,约定2
根据企业所得税法律制度的规定,下列各项中,属于企业所得税纳税人的有()。
Excerpt1Salesofe-readerssurgedduringtheChristmasholidayseason,accordingtoaPewResearchCenterreport,whichsh
按摩女钱某在“好再来”美容院一包厢内向嫖客王某卖淫时被乙县公安局民警当场查获,经审查,钱某供认还向10余名嫖客卖淫。因全案一时难以查清,乙县公安局决定对钱某取保候审。问题:乙县公安局对钱某取保候审是否正确?
最新回复
(
0
)