首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2017-03-25
78
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U. S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出,在1986年被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有半涉及铁路公司,但铁路公司经常会胜诉。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TKGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
InsomeAfricancountries,thecostoftreatinganAIDSpatientmay______hisorherentireannualincome.
1.Theonrushofcheapcommunications,powerfulcomputersandtheInternetallexplainwhymanypeoplefeelthat,nowadays,chan
Distanceeducationisenrollmentandstudywithaneducationalinstitutionthatprovideslessonmaterialspreparedinasequenti
Thereislittlelearninginvolvedwhenoneisreprimandedtwoorthreemonthsafterthedeed.
Inrecentyearstherehasbeena______increaseinthecostofliving,manyfamilieshavetodependonthefederalaids.
Thinkaboutwhatwouldmakeyoureally,reallyhappy.Moremoney?Wrong.Smiling,well-adjustedkids?Wrongagain.Thefactisw
GeorgeMasonmustrankwithJohnAdamsandJamesMadisonasoneofthethreeFoundingFatherswholefttheirpersonalimprinton
Inthepast10years,thecompanyhasgradually____allofitssmallerrivals.
Today’sworkerisnolongerwillingtoworkinanauthoritariananddehumanizingenvironment.Workerswantmeaningintheirwork
"Tear’emapart!’""Killthefool!""Murderthereferee!"Thesearecommonremarksonemayhearatvarioussportingeve
随机试题
10个月患儿,诊断为重症佝偻病,用维生素D突击疗法已满3个月。其预防量每日应给维生素D。
_______是提供报社、电台、电视台编写新闻消息的文字材料,它不直接同公众见面,要经过记者的加工。
以下情形中,仲裁员必须回避、当事人也有权提出申请回避的有()。
建筑施工单位生产经营规模比较小的,可以不建立应急救援组织,但应指定一名( )的应急救援人员。
协议收购上市公司并达成协议后,收购人必须在()日内向中国证监会和证券交易所作出书面报告。
根据企业所得税的有关规定,企业发生的下列支出,应作为长期待摊费用处理的是()。
企业经营管理者总是希望企业的保本点越低越好,保本点越低,企业的经营风险就越小。()
在资产负债表日企业计算确认所持有交易性金融资产的公允价值低于其账面余额的金额,应借记的会计科目是()。
以下哪些属于明朝的会审方式()
简述中国古代法典从《唐律疏议》到《大清律例》篇章体例的发展演变。
最新回复
(
0
)