首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2017-03-25
63
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U. S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出,在1986年被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有半涉及铁路公司,但铁路公司经常会胜诉。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TKGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
AMonitor/TIPPpolllastmonthfoundthatyoungpeopleandseniorsheldsimilarviewswhenaskedto______theimportanceofUS
Whenaconsumerfindsthatanitemsheorheboughtisinfaultyorin【S1】______someotherwaydoesnotlivetothema
Thedistancebetweentheearthandthesunmaybesaidtobe______.
Withoutdoubt,theinternationalrelationsappearattimesbewildering.Studentsmayattimefeelthattheireffortstoundersta
Sofarasthefoodindustryisconcerned,theprocessingofsheepandlambsisrelatively______intheUnitedStates,accountin
TwomonthsagoyougotajobasaprogrammerforthecompanyofTIANYI.Butnowyoufindthattheworkisnotwhatyouexpected.Y
Themostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemost.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringforyourselfsomethingthatis
Themostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemost.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringforyourselfsomethingthatis
"Tear’emapart!’""Killthefool!""Murderthereferee!"Thesearecommonremarksonemayhearatvarioussportingeve
【T1】Determinedtomakeitonhisown,Bushdidnottellhisfatherthathewas’applyingtoHarvardBusinessSchool.【T2】The"Wes
随机试题
设A,B均为n阶方阵,且AB不可逆,则[].
A.肾小球滤过率下降B.血浆胶体渗透压降低C.抗利尿激素(ADH)分泌减少D.血容量减少E.继发性醛固酮增加肾病综合征水肿的主要原因是
片剂辅料中的崩解剂是
下列哪一项为扁豆的功效()
关于2007年3月全国人民代表大会通过的《物权法》规定,下列说法正确的是()。
在证券市场供给决定因素分析中,影响上市公司数量的主要因素通常有()。Ⅰ.宏观经济环境因素Ⅱ.制度因素Ⅲ.市场因素Ⅳ.竞争对手数量
下列收购未税矿产品的单位能够成为资源税扣缴义务人的有()。
数据库系统可能发生的故障有:________、系统故障和介质故障。
让人,并不是懦弱,而是一种涵养,一种胆识。“让人非我弱,弱者不让人。”蔺相如不想和廉颇争地位,路上遇到廉老将军就一而再、再而三地避让。这种豁达大度,不正体现了蔺相如以国家利益为重的崇高品德吗?因他的这种美德,才有后来廉颇老将军的“负荆请罪”,从而留下了一段
1939年,国民党提出的国民精神总动员的中心口号是__________、________、_________。
最新回复
(
0
)