首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2017-03-25
39
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U. S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出,在1986年被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有半涉及铁路公司,但铁路公司经常会胜诉。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TKGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Thegreattragedyoflifeisnotthatmen,butthattheyceasetolove.
Helikestotakeahandineverything,eventhosethathardlyconcernhim.
1.Theonrushofcheapcommunications,powerfulcomputersandtheInternetallexplainwhymanypeoplefeelthat,nowadays,chan
ThetwoclawsofthematureAmericanlobsteraredecidedlydifferentfromeachother.Thecrusherclawisshortandstout;thec
Ateacherissomeonewhocommunicatesinformationorskillsothatsomeoneelsemaylearn.Parentsarethe【C1】______teachers.
Ateacherissomeonewhocommunicatesinformationorskillsothatsomeoneelsemaylearn.Parentsarethe【C1】______teachers.
Thinkaboutwhatwouldmakeyoureally,reallyhappy.Moremoney?Wrong.Smiling,well-adjustedkids?Wrongagain.Thefactisw
FrancoisJacobwrotethat"anageorcultureischaracterizedlessbytheextentofitsknowledgethanbythenatureoftheques
Shewasextremelylucky;whenhergreat-uncledied,she______afortune.
Manyrapecrisisandbatteredwomen’sprogramsalsohaveeducationalcomponentsfocusingonyouth.However,mostoftheseapproa
随机试题
磁铁试验的作用不包括
女性,35岁,停经42天,阴道不规则少量淋漓出血10余天。诊断性刮宫,病理报告为“蜕膜组织,未见绒毛”。最可能的诊断是
某肝硬化病人,3天未大便,出现嗜睡和幻觉。在灌肠时,不宜采用哪种灌肠溶液()
患者男性,56岁,过去有嗜酒及慢性肝炎史,近2个月食欲不振、低热、消瘦、乏力、右上腹胀痛并扪到肿块。体格检查:肝肋下3cm,质硬,无腹水。B超检查发现病人肝右叶中央单个10cm×12cm占位,AFP升高,肝肾功能正常。诊断为原发性肝癌。病人2小时前突然
临床治疗心力衰竭时,应用洋地黄的主要目的是
个体工商户王某于2009年6月在某百货商场租赁一柜台用于销售绿叶公司生产的“绿源”牌连衣裙,并采取下列促销措施,其中属于不正当竞争行为的是:()
LES适用于()。
Sometimesthestudentmaybeaskedtowriteabouthis______toacertainbookorarticlethathassomebearingonthesubjectbei
Sheisahighlysuccessfulteacher.
A、Itbeginsfromacampus.B、It’sfivemileslong.C、Itgoesaroundthecityhall.D、Ittakesafewdaystocover.A推断题。浏览选项可知,选
最新回复
(
0
)