首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does Califor
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does Califor
admin
2021-10-13
101
问题
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs
We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden has a plan, as does a coalition led by Families USA (a liberal advocacy group) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (a trade group). To some extent, all these plans and others aim to provide insurance to the estimated 47 million Americans who lack it—a situation widely deplored as a national disgrace. But the real significance of all these proposals, I submit, lies elsewhere.
For decades, Americans have treated health care as if it exists in a separate economic and political world: when people need care, they should get it; costs should remain out of sight. About 60 percent of Americans receive insurance through their employers; to most workers, the full costs are unknown. The 65-and-older population and many poor people receive government insurance. Except for modest Medicare premiums and payroll taxes, costs are largely buried in federal and state budgets.
It is this segregation of health care from everything else that is now crumbling— and the various health proposals are just one sign. We see others all the time. For example, even with employer-provided insurance, workers’ monthly premiums (which cover only part of the costs) have skyrocketed. From 1999 to 2006, they doubled from $129 to $248.
Look at Massachusetts. Last year the then Gov. Mitt Romney made headlines by signing legislation to cover all the state’s uninsured. The law required that everyone with incomes three times the federal poverty line buy "affordable" insurance (people with incomes below that threshold would be subsidized on a sliding scale). Romney suggested annual premiums for a single worker might total $2,400. But when insurance companies recently provided real estimates, the cost was much higher: $4,560. Is it a sensible policy to force workers with a $30,000 income—about triple the poverty line— to spend nearly a sixth of their budget on health insurance, as opposed to food, rent or transportation? Good question.
The hard questions won’t sit still, because health care (now a sixth of the economy, up from an 11th in 1980) is too big to be hidden. Myths abound. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the doubling of premiums for employer-provided coverage doesn’t mean companies shifted a greater share of costs to workers. In both 1999 and 2006, premiums covered 27 percent of costs, says Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute. It’s simply the rapid rise in total health spending that’s depressed workers’ take-home pay.
One myth about the uninsured is that, because they’re heavy users of emergency-room services, providing them with insurance (and regular care) would actually lower their costs. This may be true for some—but not most. The trouble is that the uninsured don’t really use emergency rooms heavily. A study on the journal Health Affairs finds that their use is similar to that of people with private insurance—and half that of people with Medicaid. The upshot is that extending insurance to all the uninsured would be costly, because they would get more and (presumably) better care. John Sheils of the Lewin Group estimates the annual cost of their care would rise 75 percent to $145 billion.
Our health-care system will inevitably combine government regulation and private enterprise. But what should the mix be? Which patients, providers and technologies should be subsidized and why? How important is health care compared with other public and private goals? Will an expanding health-care sector spur the economy—or, through high taxe and insurance premiums, retard it? We have refused to have this debate for obvious reasons. A friend of mine recently had a near-death experience; he survived only because he had superb medical care. Debating health care makes us queasy, because it pits moral imperatives (including the right to live) against coldhearted economics.
I don’t intend to examine—at least now—all the new proposals. Some would do better at some goals (say, protecting the poor) than at others (say, controlling costs). But the Bush proposal does have one huge virtue: it exposes health-care costs to the broad public. By not taxing employer-paid insurance, the government now provides a huge invisible subsidy to workers. Bush wouldn’t end the subsidy, but by modifying it with specific deductions for insurance ($15,000 for families, $7,500 for singles), he would force most workers to see the costs. By contrast, some other proposals disguise their costs. Schwarzenegger’s plan shifts costs to the federal government, doctors and hospitals. It’s clever, but it perpetuates the illusion that health care is cheap—or even free.
However our health system evolves—with more government control or more market influence—Americans need to come to a more realistic understanding of its limits. Underestimating its costs and exaggerating its benefits guarantees disappointment. If the present outpouring of proposals signals a start of our needed debate, then it is long overdue.
Which of the following is NOT a sign that shows the present situation of American’s health care?
选项
A、The various health proposals.
B、The various benefits it provides.
C、The Massachusetts law by Mitt Romney.
D、The increase of workers’ monthly premiums.
答案
B
解析
由第三和第四段可知,各种各样的健康提议只是反映美国卫生体制的一个信号(A),工人的月保费增长也是一个信号(D),还有马萨诸塞州的情况(C)等等。故B为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TcIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、Notassumingeveryonewillbehaveinthesamewayasyoudo.B、Tryingtorespecttheculturaltraditionsofyourcounterparts.
A、Becauseshewassavingup.B、Becauseshewaspregnant.C、Becauseherhusbandadvisedhertodoso.D、Becauseshefellillbeca
A、ThisThursday.B、RightAftertheinterviewoftwomoreapplicants.C、Withinaweek.D、Itisnotmentioned.C对话的最后,面试官提到,他们公司的做
PASSAGEFOURWhatcanthesuccessofGooglebeascribedtoaccordingtothefirstparagraph?
A、Frequentlychangetheirpasswordsofonlineaccounts.B、Puttheirphotosonlinefrequentlyandrandomly.C、Guaranteethedecen
A、Peopleprefertoputtheirprivatepictureonline.B、Peoplejustputtheirpreferablepicturesonline.C、Pictureswithmicroph
(1)Afterthirtyyearsofmarriedhappiness,hecouldstillremindhimselfthatVictoriawasendowedwitheverycharmexceptthe
(1)Inadecadeworkingasananny,AndreiaSoaresfinallyclambereduptheladderintoBrazil’smiddleclass.(2)Withthemo
PASSAGETWOWhatdoweknowaboutBritons’viewabouteconomicgrowthandcarbonreduction?
ToGetontheSamePageSamiAdwanistheverymodelofasoft-spokenprofessor.Hemeasureshiswords,andlistenscarefully
随机试题
刚性支承是指机械的主激频率()的支承。
患者,女,70岁。患咳喘病20年,今春发作,喘咳气逆,咯痰不爽,胸闷如塞,厌食寡语,神志恍惚,嗜睡,肢体抽搐,舌暗红苔白腻,脉滑数。其治法是
A.卡那霉繁B.对氨基水杨酸C.利福平D.异烟肼E.乙胺丁醇
没有代理权而以代理人的名义在票据上签章的,应当如何承担票据责任?()。
“PLSOFFER600MTGROUNDNUTS2012CROPCIFC5%TOKYODIRECTSTEAMERINDICATINGPYMTTERMSEARLIESTSHIPMENT”,上述内容是贸易磋商中的发盘环节。(
有关属人管辖原则的表述,下列说法正确的是( )。
法国人谈起中国人心目中的法国文学,总忍不住用一种轻蔑的口吻说:“你们喜欢《茶花女》。”在法国人眼里,喜欢大仲马还算有些品味,毕竟他有一部《基督山伯爵》,有《三个火枪手》,小仲马有什么呢?只不过写了一个交际花而已。法国文学是法国人的骄傲,在世界文学中有着举足
利他行为,有利于其他个体存活和生殖而不利于自身存活和生殖的行为,这种行为在自然界普遍存在。可用广义适合度和亲缘选择加以解释。根据上述定义,下列属于利他行为的是:
某单位要从100名报名者中挑选出20名献血者进行体检。最不可能被挑选上的是1993年以来已经献过血,或是1995年以来在献血体检中不合格的人。如果上述断定是真的,那么以下哪项所言及的报名者最有可能被选上?
Bytheendofnextmonthhe___________everythinginschool.
最新回复
(
0
)