2. 外语
  3. Use of Trademarks A company must determine whether or not to apply for trademark protection under the federal Lanham Act of

Use of Trademarks A company must determine whether or not to apply for trademark protection under the federal Lanham Act of

admin2012-07-29  53
问题                         Use of Trademarks
    A company must determine whether or not to apply for trademark protection under the federal Lanham Act of 1946 or state law. A trademark gives a firm exclusive use of a "word, symbol, combination of letters or numbers, or other devices such as distinctive packaging used to identify the goods of one company and to distinguish them from other companies" for as long as they are marketed.
    Trademarks are voluntary and require a registration procedure that can be time consuming, complex, and expensive. A multinational firm must register trademarks in every country in which it operates. In order for a trademark to be legally protected, it must have a distinctive meaning that does not describe an entire product category, not be confusingly similar to other trademarks, be used in interstate commerce, and not imply characteristics that the product does not possess. A surname by itself cannot be registered, because anyone can do business under his or her name. However, an surname can be registered if used to describe a specific business (e. g. , Roy Roger’s Restaurants).
    When brands become too popular or descriptive of a product category, they run the risk of becoming public property. Then a firm loses its trademark position. Brands that are fighting to remain exclusive trademarks include Xerox, Levi’s Frigidaire, Formica, Kleenex, and Teflon. Brands of former trademarks that are now considered generic and therefore public property are cellophane(赛璐芬) , aspirin, kerosene(煤油) , cola, linoleum(漆布) , and monopoly.
    DuPont used careful research to retain a trademark for Teflon. As company survey showed that 68 percent of the consumers questioned identified Teflon as a brand name. This enabled DuPont to win a court case against a Japanese firm using the name Teflon. On the other hand, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that "Monopoly"was a generic term that could be used by any game maker. Likewise, a federal court ruled that Miller could not trademark the single word Lite for its lower-calorie(低热量) beer.
    Trademark protection is essential to many firms because exclusive use of brands and symbols enables them to maintain long-established images and market shares.  
In its fight to retain an exclusive trademark for Teflon, one of the things DuPont did is
选项 A、identifying it as a brand name
B、winning a court case against a Japanese firm
C、carrying out a survey
D、appealing to the Supreme Court
答案C
解析 文章的第四段第一和第二句句子告诉我们，DuPont公司为确保Teflon商标，进行了调查，调查显示，68%的被询问顾客将Teflon认做商标名。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Tdmd777K
本试题收录于： 职称英语卫生类A级题库职称英语分类
0

职称英语卫生类A级

职称英语

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)