首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2019-11-02
26
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration—a pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants, and a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U.S.-born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things, " says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase." And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is bom on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
The author is most probably______.
选项
A、a scientist
B、an economist
C、a politician
D、a sociologist
答案
D
解析
作者最有可能是:该题为推断题,文中多次提到“经济学家告诉我们”以及“政客们”如何如何,可见作者不属于他们中的任何一种。此外,该文章也不是科技文,所以作者最有可能是探讨社会问题的社会学家。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TjbK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Whilemanynationshaveagingpopulations,Japan’sdemographiccrisisistrulydire,withforecastsshowingthat40percentof
Womenweremorelikelythanmentoreporthavingunderstandingsaboutsaferbehavior,suchasagreeingnottogetdrunk(23per
Womenweremorelikelythanmentoreporthavingunderstandingsaboutsaferbehavior,suchasagreeingnottogetdrunk(23per
Fundingpublictransitisoneofthebiggestproblemsfacingcitiestoday.Oftenthetroubleisthatafewhigh-cost,low-rider
A、Itwillbringaquickreturnofmoneyataratherlowcost.B、Itwilltakealongtimetodevelopgoodcourseware.C、Itislik
A、BecauseitisthebestuniversityinCanada.B、Becauseithasthemostbeautifulcampusallovertheworld.C、Becausehercous
ChineseAmericansI.EarlyimmigrationA.thefirstgroupofChineseimmigrants—cameto【T1】______【T1】______—becamethe【T2】__
PASSAGETWOWhatdoestheword"leash"implyinPara.7?
A、LivinginthecenterofLondon.B、Don’tjudgebypersonalpreferences.C、Neverlivinginabeautifulvillagehouse.D、Don’twa
随机试题
在考生文件夹下有一个数据库文件“sarap3.accdb”,里面已经设计了表对象“tEmp”、窗体对象“fEmp”、报表对象“rEmp”和宏对象“mEmp”。试在此基础上按照以下要求补充设计。将报表“rEmp”按照聘用时间的年代分组排列输出,同时在其对
下列与I型超敏反应无关的物质是
散点分布在一条直线上,且x增加时y值增大,可初步判断两变量为
A.人参养荣汤B.参苓白术散C.八珍汤D.二仙汤合开郁散E.神效瓜蒌散合开郁散乳岩之脾虚胃弱证,治疗首选
李某是某股份公司的董事,在其执行职务时,利用职务之便,多次以公司的财产为朋友提供担保,并获取好处费,则公司可以采取()措施维护自身的利益。
收购要约约定的收购期限不得少于______日,并不得超过______日。( )
关于总会计师性质与地位的下列表述中,符合会计法律制度规定的有( )。
患者,女性,67岁。患牙右下6因重度磨耗露髓,拟行根管治疗,常规根管治疗的步骤为()。
根据国际卫生与保健组织2000年年会“通讯与健康”公布的调查报告显示,68%的脑癌患者都有经常使用移动电话的历史。这充分说明,经常使用移动电话将极大增加一个人患脑癌的可能性。以下哪项若为真,则最严重削弱上述结论?
直到最近,人类学家才普遍认为高级灵长类动物起源于3000万年前的埃及的AlFayyu出地区。然而,1978年在缅甸(现在叫作Myanrnar)发现的4000万年前的下颚骨化石碎片被用来证明最早的灵长类动物起源于缅甸的理论。无论如何,这个声明还为时过早,因为
最新回复
(
0
)