首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
America is said to have the most successful economic system in history. But sometimes it breaks. So too do the big banks, the mo
America is said to have the most successful economic system in history. But sometimes it breaks. So too do the big banks, the mo
admin
2015-01-10
52
问题
America is said to have the most successful economic system in history. But sometimes it breaks. So too do the big banks, the most highly distilled form and symbol of this system. And never more so than in the crash of 2008. The culprit in that crash has broadly been identified as greed, and the solutions have focused on additional regulation of Wall Street. But there have been few proposed solutions to one of the most important, and mostly unexamined, causes of the downturn: groupthink.
I saw groupthink in action during my time on Wall Street. One sees hints of it in research showing that subprime bankers had worse personal real estate performance than the average American. And I lived it when I was fired from my position running Smith Barney at Citi after advocating partly reimbursing clients for losses on(unintentionally)high-risk products we sold them. I was told to "get back in line" and was later relieved of my duties. When people ask me if I was fired because I am a woman, my prior answer of "Absolutely not" has now become "Well…not exactly" as I’ve reviewed the research on gender differences in the workplace.
While I did not necessarily take the positions I did because I’m a woman, research shows that compared with men, women are more risk-averse, take a longer-term perspective and are more concerned about maintaining relationships. And thus in a climate like Wall Street’s, women are arguably more client-focused. These differing perspectives are neither good nor bad in and of themselves, and they can be complementary and therefore can strengthen an institution. Studies have shown time and again that companies with diverse management teams outperform those with less diverse teams—and that diverse teams outperform even more "capable"(on paper)teams.
That makes sense to me. Earlier in my career, I worked at Sanford Bernstein, by far the most diverse company I’ve been at. We actively hired people with non-Ivy League, non-Wall Street backgrounds, including even a taxi driver.(And that’s not to mention a just-returning-to-the-workforce-after-maternity-leave mom like me.)When I was director of research there in the late 1990s, we began pursuing a strategy very different from that of the rest of Wall Street, pulling ourselves out of the extraordinarily lucrative—but conflicted—business of stock underwriting. We energetically debated the trade-offs of this decision. Our business suffered greatly for a few years(even our clients questioned us), but when Eliot Spitzer revealed that research analysts had been misleading investors by publicly praising—but privately disparaging—stocks, our lonely choice was validated. There is no question in my mind that it was because we were a diverse group of individuals that we questioned the conventional wisdom.
But it’s not all about individual firms’ fates and fortunes. The entire economy can suffer when groupthink is allowed to run rampant, as it did in financial services—among bankers, regulators, rating agencies, boards, analysts and others. When diversity is embraced, however, there can be a major economic upside. The economic engagement of women, in particular, is a driver of economic growth, which positively affects everyone. A 2012 Booz & Co. Goldman Sachs report estimated that fully engaging women in the economy would increase U. S. GDP by a whopping 8%. More women in the workforce begets more demand, more demand begets more jobs, more jobs begets more demand.
What’ s more, diversity can drive second-order positive economic impacts. Recent research from the Center for Talent Innovation indicates that greater diversity can power greater innovation. At the end of the day, though, diversifying the leadership of Wall Street and corporate America is a fairness issue. Companies with more-diverse leadership teams have lower gender-pay disparities throughout their workforce. And for the banks, the fairness imperative is even clearer: gains in good times accrue to shareholders and employees, who represent an increasingly nondiverse group, while the risk of extreme losses has been shouldered by taxpayers. Unfortunately, progress on diversity has stalled in corporate America and actually gone backward on Wall Street’
One can see the promise of a business world dominated by those who " think different. " Harnessing the messy clash of ideas inherent in diverse perspectives is the smart path forward to a more modern and sustainable economic system.
WOMEN BY THE NUMBERS
18%: Approximate percentage of female executive officers and managers in the securities, investment-banking and commodities industries
17%: Percentage of Fortune 500 board-of-director seats held by women; only 23 women are CEOs of Fortune 500 companies
16%: Average return on equity for a company whose board includes one or more women; companies with no women on the board have an average of 12%
15% : Percentage by which the presence of a female director on a company’s board reduces the cost of a successful acquisition
What is groupthink according to the author? Why does she say that groupthink is "one of the most important, and mostly unexamined, causes of the downturn"(para. 1)in 2008?
选项
答案
mainly refers to the male dominance of financial business at management level/and their way of thinking/often focusing on making more money("greed")/particularly shown from subprime bankers in their real estate performance/professionals worse "than the average American"/the crash of 2008 closely related to such groupthink/leads to the arriving of 2008 economic crisis/the groupthink of greed psychology : one of the most important causes/according to the author/this root cause has not been fully examined and criticized/groupthink could be out of control("go rampant")and even lead to financial disasters/
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UJSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
HolidayBluesFormostofus,thepurposeoftheholidaysistobringpeace,loveandgoodwilltowardsall.Yet,formany,t
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Ifpeoplecannotaffordtobuytheirownhouse,theycanrentpropertyfromaprivatelandlord,as10%ofthepopulationdoes,o
Ourcompanywillprovideyouwithfreetransportationasyourequestedandchargetheinstallation.
WorldWaterShortageAnewstudywarnsthataboutthirtypercentoftheworld’speoplemaynothaveenoughwaterbytheyear
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
MycompanyisExcellentKitchenwareCompany,therenearbyisabigmarketforkitchenwareinourcity.
Thebankrequiresthattherealestatecompanynaturallyserveasaloan________foritscustomers.
随机试题
有权作出吊销公证员执业证书的行政处罚的机关是
说明如何正确分析和评价杰出人物在历史上的作用。
患者,男性,43岁,主因左眼睑下垂l周入院。X线胸部正侧位片显示前上纵隔6cm×6cm肿物,边界清楚。纵隔肿瘤中除胸腺瘤外,位于前三位的其他两种肿瘤是
女,50岁,阴道镜检宫颈取材病理所见为异型上皮达到上皮全层,采取哪种治疗最合适
直径大于50ram的低压碳素钢管的坡口加工方法为()。
风险对房地产投资决策的影响包括()
明察秋毫:洞若观火
甲、乙两人轮流投篮,每人每次投一球。约定甲先投且先投中者获胜,一直到有人获胜或每人都已投球3次时投篮结束。设甲每次投篮投中的概率为,乙每次投篮投中的概率为,且各次投篮互不影响。则投篮结束时乙只投了两个球的概率为:
存储过程是存储在数据库中的代码,具有很多优点。下列陈述中不属于存储过程优点的是——。
A:Whatisallthisglassdoingonthefloor?B:______
最新回复
(
0
)