首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a gla
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a gla
admin
2018-04-04
39
问题
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a glass of red wine a day will help us live longer. The next day, maybe not. It seems journalists are pretty interested in wine research and the same might be said for coffee. Now, there’s been a lot of research into whether coffee is good for our health. "The results have really been mixed," admits Neal Freedman who led the coffee study and published his findings in a medical journal recently. "There’s been some evidence that coffee might increase the risk of certain diseases and there’s also been maybe more recent evidence that coffee may protect against other diseases as well."
Freedman and his colleagues undertook the biggest study yet to look at the relationship between coffee and health. They analyzed data collected from more than 400,000 Americans ages 50 to 71 participating in the study. "We found that the coffee drinkers had a modestly lower risk of death than those no-drinkers," he said. Here’s what he means by "modestly" : those who drank at least two or three cups a day were about 10 percent or 15 percent less likely to die for any reason during the 13 years of the study. When the researchers looked at specific causes of death, coffee drinking appeared to cut the risk of dying from heart disease, lung disease, injuries, accidents and infections.
Now, Freedman stressed that the study doesn’t prove coffee can make people live longer. A study like this can never prove a cause-and-effect relationship. All it can really do is to point researchers in the right direction for further investigation. And even if it turns out that coffee is really good for you, scientists have no idea why.
According to the author, scientists______.
选项
A、have already proved that coffee is good for human health
B、have a long way to go before they find a way to study coffee
C、have avoided the cause-and-effect approach to study coffee
D、are still unable to figure out why coffee is good for us
答案
D
解析
根据第三段最后一句“And even if it turns out that coffee is really good for you,scientists have no idea why.”可知,科学家们对咖啡有益于人体的原因还没有弄明白,所以选项D正确。选项C干扰性较强,从最后一段第二句可知,科学家们并不是一开始就have avoided the cause-and-effect approach to study coffee,排除C。故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UiCO777K
0
成人本科学位英语
相关试题推荐
Howshouldoneinvestasumofmoneyinthesedaysofinflation(通货膨胀)?Leftinabankitwillhardlykeepitsvalue,howeverh
Saltisasnecessarytolifeaswater.InmanyareasofAfricapeopleoncedranktheurine(尿)ofanimalsbecausetheyhadnoot
Thecoursewould(havebeenoffered)thisterm,butit(cancelled)becausetoofewstudentshad(registered)beforeregistration
Itseemsverydifficult________.
Phonecaller:Hello.CouldIspeaktoHelen?Helen:________
Fromtheverybeginning,waterhasfurnishedmanwithasourceoffoodandahighwaytotravel.Thefirstcivilizationsarose【C1
Fromtheverybeginning,waterhasfurnishedmanwithasourceoffoodandahighwaytotravel.Thefirstcivilizationsarose【C1
Tilenecklacehas96piecesandtheyareworth,individuallyand______alotofmoney.
Onemusttryhisbestto______tothenewenvironment.
Onemusttryhisbestto____________tothenewenvironment.
随机试题
可用于亲水性凝胶骨架片的材料为
男性,41岁。发热2周,右上腹及右腰部疼痛1周。体检:右上腹隆起,肝肋下3cm,有叩痛及触痛,B超:肝右叶下部5锄×4cm液平段,1个月前有慢性腹泻史,考虑为阿米巴肝脓肿。下列哪项治疗是错误的
流感病室用食醋熏蒸消毒,每100m3空间食醋的用量为( )
意识全部丧失,深浅反射均消失的状态称为
A.二陈汤合三子养亲汤B.清金化痰汤C.桑杏汤D.黛蛤散合黄芩泻白散E.三拗汤合止嗽散
某机械预算价格为20万元,耐用总台班为4500台班,大修理间隔台班为900台班,一次大修理费为9000元,则台班大修理费为()元。
填入空缺处最恰当的是()。
(注:顺差是指在国际收支上,一定时期内收入大于支出的差额;逆差指的是在国际收支上,一定时期内支出大于收入的差额;表中同比数据为正的代表同比增长,同比数据为负的代表同比下降)2011年至2017年,我国服务进出口逆差最大的年份是:
有以下程序main(){unsignedchara=2,b=4,c=5,d;d=a|b;d&=c;printf("%d\n",d);}程序运行后的输出结果是
十进制数39转换成二进制整数是
最新回复
(
0
)