A year has passed since Chile’s 33 trapped miners were hauled to freedom in the Atacama Desert. By and large, it’s been a relati

admin2015-09-26  36

问题     A year has passed since Chile’s 33 trapped miners were hauled to freedom in the Atacama Desert. By and large, it’s been a relatively safe year in the country’s mines. The number of deaths from mining accidents has fallen sharply, from 27 in the first half of 2010 to 12 in the same period this year. Although it is too early to tell how much of that improvement will stick, the days when mining claimed hundreds of Chilean lives each year are thankfully gone. The government has increased the number of inspectors at Chile’s mines from 18 at the time of last year’s accident to 45 now. Those officials have carried out more than 3,800 inspections in Chile’s 8,000 mines so far this year. In July the government sent a draft bill to Parliament to overhaul mine safety regulation, describing it as the most important legislation in the area in 30 years.
    Despite this good work, however, there is one glaring anomaly that needs to be addressed; Chile has yet to ratify(正式批准)the International Labour Organisation’s(ILO)Convention 176 on mining safety. The convention has been around for 13 years, and has been adopted by 25 countries from Albania to Zimbabwe. It establishes workers’ rights to refuse work they consider unsafe, to leave a mine they consider dangerous and to elect their own health and safety representatives. In the days after last year’s remarkable rescue Sebastian Pihera, the President, promised to ratify the convention. But today his government still seems hesitant to do so. It has asked the ILO for more information on how the measures would affect the mining industry, which accounts for around a fifth of the country’s GDP.
    Even though all 33 people trapped in the San Jose mine were rescued, last year was still the deadliest in Chile’s mines for over a decade: 45 miners were killed at work. It’s no coincidence that it was also the year in which the copper price averaged a record high of over $3. 40 a pound($7.50 per kg). When the price of Chile’s chief export is high, accidents happen. That’s because an army of part-time, unsupervised miners, often with little experience, head out into the Atacama Desert in search of the mineral. Mines that closed long ago because they were unprofitable suddenly find they can make money again and reopen, often with no better safety standards than when they closed. The reverse is also true: when the copper price is low, the accident rate falls. The safest year in the history of Chilean mining was 1999, with just 0. 09 deaths for every million hours worked. That year copper sold for just 72 cents a pound.
    This year copper has averaged over $4 a pound. Mining is booming. All the more reason, therefore, to reflect on the extraordinary events of last year at the San Jose mine, and to invest a little more of the industry’s handsome profits in safety improvements.
According to the passage, which of the following statements is CORRECT?

选项 A、The mining industry occupies a minor part in Chile’s GDP.
B、Chilean government should think twice before ratifying the ILO’s Convention 176.
C、San Jose’s mine rescue shows Chile’s remarkable progress in rescue work.
D、It’s high time Chilean government took measures to strengthen its mining safety.

答案D

解析 细节题。最后一段最后一句提到,智利政府更有理由将采铜业中的不菲利润多分出一部分投资在安全设施改善上,由此可知,[D]“现在是智利政府采取措施加强其采矿安全的时候了”为正确答案。第二段最后一句提到,智利政府要求国际劳工组织提供更多关于该措施会如何影响采矿业的信息,因为采矿业产值大约占智利国内生产总值的20%,由此可知,采矿业是智利的重要工业,而[A]“采矿业在智利国内生产总值中处于一个不重要的位置”陈述错误,故排除;作者在第二段主要阐述智利政府未批准国际劳工组织关于采矿安全的第176号公约,以及批准该措施的必要性,而[B]“智利政府在正式批准第176号公约前应该三思而后行”陈述错误,故排除;作者在第二段第四句用remarkable rescue描述去年阿塔卡马沙漠被困矿工的营救行动,但作者并未陈述智利如何在营救方面取得进步,[C]陈述错误,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UiXK777K
0

最新回复(0)