首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
It is not forbidden to dream of building a better world, which is by and large what the social sciences try to help us to do. Ho
It is not forbidden to dream of building a better world, which is by and large what the social sciences try to help us to do. Ho
admin
2013-01-30
21
问题
It is not forbidden to dream of building a better world, which is by and large what the social sciences try to help us to do. How to make cities more harmonious, reduce crime rates, improve welfare, overcome racism, increase our wealth—this is the stuff of social sciences. The trouble is that the findings of social sciences are often dismissed as being too theoretical, too ambitious or too unpalatable. The methods of research are also often attacked for their lack of rigor, and critics are quick to point out that the people who make the important decisions pay little attention to what social scientists have to say anyway. This would change if the social sciences made themselves more relevant and ready for the society of the 21st century.
Social sciences began to take shape in the 19th century, but came into their own at the beginning of the 20th century, when a number of well-established disciplines, including economics , sociology, political science, history and anthropology really made their mark. Geography and psychology could be added to that list. However, only sociology, political science and e-conomics have succeeded in consolidating their position in the social sciences mainstream. The others were virtually all marginalised. Moreover, powerful institutional barriers now separate the various disciplines.
Hardly the right atmosphere in which to grow and deal with the harsh criticism which the social sciences have come in for from many quarters, including governments and international commissions. Radical measures are now being suggested to turn things round, from how to award university chairs, to setting syllabi and raising funds.
The need for decompartmentalising and striking a new order in the relationship between the disciplines concerns all of the social sciences, though perhaps economics most of all. Only it has acquired a dominant position in management and public affairs. Some would say it has fallen under the sway of "unitary thinking", with little room for debate, for example, on the question of debt reduction or monetary tightness. Moreover, many people do not believe that economic science forms part of social sciences at all. This is a somewhat problematic position to uphold, particularly as economic developments are largely determined by political, social and cultural factors. Yet, e-conomists often have difficulty understanding or taking such factors into account. This has left economics exposed to attack, for example, over its prescriptions for development and its analysis of events, such as the causes of the Asian crisis. To many, economics relies too heavily on hypothetical and sometimes unrealistic assumptions.
Can social sciences bounce back and assert themselves in the 21st century? We will probably not be able to tell for a few decades, since the ways in which societies analyse themselves develop very slowly. After all, the social sciences are rarely given to sudden discoveries and headline breakthroughs like some other sciences. What is more, social sciences may continue to face the stout resistance of established institutions defending their own territory and opposing innovation and change. Could it be that society, which by definition seeks stability, has an in-built resistance towards indulging in any form of self-analysis? Few people have an appetite for hard truth. But perhaps in the information age and in the dematerialised economy of the knowledge world, all that could change. Perhaps society will discover a pressing need to know itself much better, if only to survive. Social sciences will then have a different status.
The author of this article_____.
选项
A、believes that the social sciences have become unimportant and unnecessary
B、believes that the social sciences are faced with too many problems
C、speculates that the future of the social sciences may be better
D、considers the social sciences hostile to progress
答案
C
解析
根据最后一段第一句“Can social sciences bounce back and assert themselves in the 21st century? We will probably not be able to tell for a few decades,since the ways in which societies analyse themselves develop very slowly.”可知,作者只是猜测社会科学的未来是美好的。由此得出,答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/V1hi777K
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
What’syourearliestchildhoodmemory?Canyourememberlearningtowalk?Ortalk?Thefirsttimeyou【C1】______thunderorwatche
Doyouforgettoturnoffthelightsandheaterswhenyougooutofaroom?In2040itwillnotmatter.Theywillturnthemselve
IntheUSA,85%ofthepopulationovertheageof21approveofthedeathpenalty.Inthemanystateswhichstillhavethedeath
Becauseofadverseweatherconditions,thetravelersstoppedtocamp.
"Businesscasual"wasprevalentseveralyearsagobecause______Whenthe"businesscasual"prevailed,______
Thefollowingaccountbytheauthor______thedifferencebetweenEuropeanandAmericanreactions.
Sheshould______thosepresentatthemeetingtoarriveataclear-cutdecision.
FrictionbetweenAmerica’smilitaryanditscivilianoverseersisnothingnew.America’s220-yearexperimentinciviliancontrol
Childrenaregettingsofattheymaybethefirstgenerationtodiebeforetheirparents,anexpertclaimedyesterday.Today’
Thenormalhumandailycycleofactivityisofsome7-8hours’sleepalternationwithsome16-17hours’wakefulnessandthatthe
随机试题
《就任北京大学校长之演说》在写作方面的特点。
某防疫站为了评价不同燃料燃烧对室内空气质量的影响,拟分别测定燃煤、燃气、燃柴家庭室内SO2含量,应采用的气体采集法为
A.牙源性颌骨囊肿B.发育性囊肿C.阻塞性囊肿D.牙源性肿瘤E.孤立性囊肿血外渗性囊肿属于
患者,男,68岁。2型糖尿病8年,胰岛素6U治疗,餐前30分钟,Htid。最合适的注射部位是()。
甲建设单位与施工单位订立了施工合同,甲建设单位负责建筑材料的采购,于是甲建设单位向乙材料生产厂家发函要求购买无机气硬性胶凝材料,发出一份传真内容如下:本公司希望向你公司购买建筑石膏20t(价格为5600元/t),建筑石灰42t(价格为2400/t),在本单
(2012年卷二第15题)2008年,何某在一次意外事故中下落不明。2011年,经何某妻子申请,人民法院宣告何某死亡,其名下的财产也被继承。2012年,何某回到家中。原来何某在该次事故中被救起,后一直在其他城市打工,但未与家人联系。根据民法通则及相关规定,
吴某,女性,54岁,工人,小学文化,已婚。自我陈述:睡眠差。全身不适伴发冷两个多月。在两个月前,我也不知道怎么回事就出现头痛、头晕、睡眠差,没力气、手酸、胃口不好,去医院看,做了很多检查,也没有发现什么问题。以后这些不舒服更加厉害,吃过中药
同一个和弦音之间上方或下方二度(大、小)关系的外音称为()。
甲、乙和丙,一位是山东人,一位是河南人,一位是湖北人。现在只知道:丙比湖北人年龄大,甲和河南人不同岁,河南人比乙年龄小。由此可以推知:
Ourape-menforefathershadnoobviousnaturalweaponsinthestruggleforsurvivalintheopen.Theyhadneitherthepowerfult
最新回复
(
0
)