首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s
admin
2012-12-01
44
问题
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s Essays. My friend Margaret Rea and I spent hours wandering around Boston discussing the meaning and implications of the essays. Michel de Montaigne lived in the 16th century near Bordeaux, France. He did his writing in the southwest tower of his chateau, where he surrounded himself with a library of more than 1,000 books, a remarkable collection for that time. Montaigne posed the question, "What do I know?" By extension, he asks us all: Why do you believe what you think you know? My latest attempt to answer Montaigne can be found in Everyday Practice of Science: Where Intuition and Passion Meet Objectivity and Logic, originally published in January 2009 and soon to be out in paperback from the Oxford University Press.
Scientists tend to be glib about answering Montaigne’s question. After all, the success of technology testifies to the truth of our work. But the situation is more complicated.
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experiences. Prior knowledge and interests influence what we experience, what we think our experiences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.
Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes communal scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.
Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works its way through the community, a dialectic of interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.
Two paradoxes infuse this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not research. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Szent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as "seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought." But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.
In the end, credibility "happens" to a discovery claim — a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. "We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason," she wrote in a book with that title. In the case of science, it is the commons of the mind where we find the answer to Montaigne’s question: Why do you believe what you think you know?
Albert Szent-Gyorgyi would most likely agree that
选项
A、scientific claims will survive challenges.
B、discoveries today inspire future research.
C、efforts to make discoveries are justified.
D、scientific work calls for a critical mind.
答案
D
解析
观点态度题。由题干中的人名Albert Szent-Gy6rgyi将答案出处定位到第六段倒数第三句。该句提到Albert Szent-Gy6rgyi曾把发现描述为“见他人所见,想他人所未想”。结合后面提到的“但是思考没人想过的事情,再告诉别人他们漏掉了什么…”可知,Albert Szent-Gy6rgyi的言外之意就是科学工作需要敢于挑战已有的发现,需要有批判的精神,故答案为[D]。[A]和[B]是第一个悖论中涉及的观点,故排除。[C]与该段讲述内容无关,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VJaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Peopleusuallycommunicatebyspokenandwrittenlanguage,yettheycanalsocommunicatewithoutwordsandthiskindofcommunic
WhichofthefollowingisnotaBritishnewspaper?
Whatmightdrivingonanautomatedhighwaybelike?Theanswerdependsonwhatkindofsystemisultimatelyadopted.Twodistinc
WhichofthefollowingisNOTarepresentativeofModernism?
______isregardedasthe"fatherofmodernlinguistics".
A、apresssecretaryB、anentertainerC、acongressmanD、apopularsingerA可用排除法。在SonnyBono的人生经历中,他曾是流行歌手、娱乐节目主持人、国会议员。
A、RickVegawasfoundtohaveabaddrivingrecord.B、Navairahadbeendrinkingbeforetheaccident.C、JoeCasiashadbeenspeed
A"scientistic"viewoflanguagewasdominantamongphilosophersandlinguistswhoaffectedtodevelopascientificanalysisof
Tolive,learn,andworksuccessfullyinanincreasing【M1】______complexandinformation-richsociety,studentsmustbeable
A、adoctor.B、asecretary.C、alawyer.D、aleader.C
随机试题
Theydidn’ttellme______gofortheirholiday.
关于全程化药学服务的内容,不正确的是
在我国,下列哪些属于法官职业道德规范所禁止的不当行为?
可以是铁路货物运输的国际贸易术语是()。
运用借贷记账法编制会计分录时,可以编制()。
Therearemanydifferentwaysofpresentinggrammarintheclassroom.Amongthem,threearemostfrequentlyusedanddiscussed.
某公司于1997年1月8日在工商部门注册登记成立,具有法人资格,2月18日正式营业,2002年3月1日被撤销,关于该公司的权利能力和行为能力,下列表述中正确的是()。
(01年)一个半球体状的雪堆.其体积融化的速率与半球面面积S成正比.比例常数K>0.假设在融化过程中雪堆始终保持半球体状,已知半径为r0的雪堆在开始融化的3小时内.融化了其体积的.问雪堆全部融化需要多少小时?
赢时通,中国证券商务网,是一个多渠道的证券电子商务平台,也是目前国内最成熟的电子商务网站之一。
A、Tobacco.B、Potatoes.C、Machinery.D、Clothing.D短文中提到,服装是安道尔公国出口产品中的一种,故答案为D)。
最新回复
(
0
)