首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s
admin
2012-12-01
47
问题
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s Essays. My friend Margaret Rea and I spent hours wandering around Boston discussing the meaning and implications of the essays. Michel de Montaigne lived in the 16th century near Bordeaux, France. He did his writing in the southwest tower of his chateau, where he surrounded himself with a library of more than 1,000 books, a remarkable collection for that time. Montaigne posed the question, "What do I know?" By extension, he asks us all: Why do you believe what you think you know? My latest attempt to answer Montaigne can be found in Everyday Practice of Science: Where Intuition and Passion Meet Objectivity and Logic, originally published in January 2009 and soon to be out in paperback from the Oxford University Press.
Scientists tend to be glib about answering Montaigne’s question. After all, the success of technology testifies to the truth of our work. But the situation is more complicated.
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experiences. Prior knowledge and interests influence what we experience, what we think our experiences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.
Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes communal scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.
Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works its way through the community, a dialectic of interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.
Two paradoxes infuse this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not research. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Szent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as "seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought." But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.
In the end, credibility "happens" to a discovery claim — a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. "We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason," she wrote in a book with that title. In the case of science, it is the commons of the mind where we find the answer to Montaigne’s question: Why do you believe what you think you know?
Albert Szent-Gyorgyi would most likely agree that
选项
A、scientific claims will survive challenges.
B、discoveries today inspire future research.
C、efforts to make discoveries are justified.
D、scientific work calls for a critical mind.
答案
D
解析
观点态度题。由题干中的人名Albert Szent-Gy6rgyi将答案出处定位到第六段倒数第三句。该句提到Albert Szent-Gy6rgyi曾把发现描述为“见他人所见,想他人所未想”。结合后面提到的“但是思考没人想过的事情,再告诉别人他们漏掉了什么…”可知,Albert Szent-Gy6rgyi的言外之意就是科学工作需要敢于挑战已有的发现,需要有批判的精神,故答案为[D]。[A]和[B]是第一个悖论中涉及的观点,故排除。[C]与该段讲述内容无关,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VJaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
StudentsinAustraliabetweentheagesof6and15canenjoy______education.
CampaigningontheIndianfrontierisanexperiencebyitself.Neitherthelandscapenorthepeoplefindtheircounterpartsina
TheStockMarketWhenanewcompanyisorganizedandsharesaresold,itisnothardtodeterminethevalueofeachshare:all
"Ido."ToAmericansthosetwowordscarrygreatmeaning.Theycanevenchangeyourlife.Especiallyifyousaythematyourown
IntroductiontoEnglishSynonymsEnglishhasthelargestvocabularyandthemostsynonymsofalllanguagesintheworld.This
Ittakesawhile,asyouwalkaroundthestreetsofNantes,acityofhaftamillionpeopleonthebanksoftheLoireRiver,to
Ittakesawhile,asyouwalkaroundthestreetsofNantes,acityofhaftamillionpeopleonthebanksoftheLoireRiver,to
A、ThestoriesofHarryPotterarecriticizedinsomeothercitiesinU.SexceptNewMexicon.B、Youngpeoplearefascinatedwith
IntheUnitedStates,charterschoolsprovidealternativesto"regular"publicschools.Unlikemostpublicschools,chartersdon
LeavingHomeGenerally,mostpeoplehaveintheirmindsapictureoftheir"idealhome",butifyouarestudentsorpeoplej
随机试题
下列不属于慢性脓胸治疗原则的是_______。
阴虚火旺之心悸首选方剂为
患者,男,30岁。急性阑尾炎合并穿孔,在硬膜外麻醉下行阑尾切除术,术后手术室护士送患者回病室向患者解释取此种体位的理由是
监理服务是监理单位的高智能投入,服务工作的好坏取决于( )。
在洞室开挖的围岩类型中,Ⅲ类围岩的特点是()。
阅读下文,回答下列题:玫瑰在植物分类上属于蔷薇科蔷薇属,已有上千年的栽培历史,在此期间,人们通过广泛杂交,培育出数量庞大的品种群。如今,世界各地(主要是北半球地区)生长着200多个种类的玫瑰。植物学家和园艺家一般将玫瑰分成两大类,即野生玫瑰和园林
Onereasonhumanbeingscanthriveinallkindsofclimatesisthattheycancontrolthequalitiesoftheairintheenclosedsp
Youmaysaythatthebusinessofmarkingbooksisgoingtoslowdownyourreading.【C1】________probablywill.That’soneof
Howoldwastheshoe?
赵州桥建于隋朝,公元605年左右,长50.82米,宽9.6米,跨度37.37米。天才建筑师李春设计并监督了桥的建设。赵州桥结构新颖、造型优美。桥有一个大拱,在大拱的两端有两个小拱,帮助排泄洪水、减轻桥梁重量并节省石材。建成以来,该桥经受了多次洪水和地震,但
最新回复
(
0
)