首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
admin
2013-04-25
27
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family, cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age persen. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:
(a) get a job and work until they die;
(b) apply for public assistance (you have to be destitute to apply); or
(c) starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.(A)But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
The word subvert in Paragraph 2 is closest in meaning to ______.
选项
A、influence
B、destroy
C、maintain
D、escape
答案
B
解析
本题为词汇题,主要考查考生根据上下文对单词subvert的理解。该词所在句子“Still others believe it will subvert relations within the family: cynics dubbed it the ’Sue Your Son’ law”的意思为:其他人仍然相信这个法律会subvert家庭关系,那些愤世嫉俗者称之为“状告儿子的法律”。根据上下文尤其是下文中的“Sue Your Son” law可以判断出subvert的意思是“破坏”。选项A(影响)、C(保持)和D(逃离)都不符合题意,因此选择B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VOyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
CompletethenotesontheCitizensAdviceBureauusingNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachgap.•11.______asolicitor•suggestwhe
Theprofessorwantsthestudentstopretendthattheyare______.
Questions7-10Completethefollowingtableofinformationaboutthewalks.
YouwantthepersonyouarecallingintheUKtopayforthecall.Youwanttocallaplacewherethereareproblemscallingt
Questions4-8CompletethefollowinginformationusingONEwordforeachgap.
Whichtwothingsareuncommoninruralareas?Wheredomanyvolunteersandtravellersrelatetheirexperiences?
Thestudentsayssheis______whensheisstudyingathome.Themainproblemthestudent’sassignmentsisthattheyfailto_
Questions21-25AnswerthefollowingquestionsusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
SECTION4Questions31-40Questions31-32CompletethefollowingsentencesusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDS.
TheDinee,aNativeAmerican(people)ofthesouthwesternUnitedStates,were(once)seminomadichunterswho(practiced)a(few)
随机试题
治疗室性心律失常的首选药物是:
下列哪项不是霍利保持器的组成部分
A.血浆蛋白质含量下降B.血红蛋白浓度降低C.血浆视黄醇结合蛋白浓度降低D.红细胞转酮醇酶活力系数>25%E.红细胞谷胱甘肽过还原物酶活力系数>1.4人体维生素B2缺乏会导致()
主动脉瓣反流时心尖部可存在
细粒土分类按( )分类。
贸易术语FOBC代表的是()。
乘坐公共交通工具的人应当做“文明乘客”,到球场看球应当做“文明观众”,在图书馆读书、读报的人应当做“文明读者”。这是因为在现实生活中人们应当遵守()
有如下程序:#includeusingnamespacestd;classtest{private:inta;public:test(){cout
A、Therearealtogetherthreedepartmentswhichprotectcustomersandworkers.B、Acompanywithpoorordangerousworkingconditi
TheImpactofWildernessTourismA)Themarketfortourisminremoteareasisboomingasneverbefore.Countriesallacrossthew
最新回复
(
0
)