首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsof
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsof
admin
2013-08-05
41
问题
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! demanding independent proof that they were making promised changes to protect the privacy of users’ search history. They also urged Google to store sensitive search data for only six months instead of nine.
Ten privacy and data-protection commissioners from countries including Canada, Germany and Britain wrote a public letter to Eric Schmidt,Google’s boss,demanding changes in Google Buzz,the firm’s social-networking service, which had been criticised for dipping into users’ Gmail accounts to find "followers" for them without clearly explaining what it was doing. Google promptly complied.
Such run-ins with regulators are likely to multiply and limit the freedom of global Internet firms. It is not just that online privacy has become a controversial issue. More importantly,privacy rules are national, but data flows lightly and instantly across borders,often thanks to companies like Google and F’acebook, which manage vast databases.
A recent scandal dubbed "Wi-Figate" exemplifies the problem. Google(accidentally, it insists)gathered data from unsecured Wi-Fi networks in people’s homes as part of a project to capture images of streets around the world. A number of regulators launched investigations. Yet their reaction varied widely, even within the European Union, where member states have supposedly aligned their stance on online privacy. Some European regulators ordered Google to preserve the data it had collected in their bailiwicks; others demanded that information related to their countries be destroyed.
Despite such differences within Europe,the gap is much greater between Europe and America,home to many of the world’s largest online social networks and search engines. European regulations are inspired by the conviction that data privacy is a fundamental human right and that individuals should be in control of how their data are used. America,on the other hand, takes a more relaxed view, allowing people to use consumer-protection laws to seek redress if they feel their privacy has been violated. Companies that handle users’ data are largely expected to police themselves.
Some experts say this dichotomy explains why Silicon Valley firms that strike out abroad have sometimes been the targets of European Union data watchdogs. Jules Polonetsky of the Future of Privacy Forum,a think tank, says that many American firms have yet to learn that showing up in Europe and extolling the virtues of self-regulation is likely to be as ineffective as rightwing politicians denouncing antidiscrimination laws back home.
Transatlantic friction between companies and regulators has grown as Europe’s data guardians have become more assertive. Francesca Bignami,a professor at George Washington University’s law school,says that the explosion of digital technologies has made it impossible for watchdogs to keep a close eye on every web company operating in their backyard. So instead they are relying more on scapegoating prominent wrongdoers in the hope that this will deter others.
But regulators such as Peter Schaar?who heads Germany’s federal data-protection agency, say the gulf is exaggerated. Some European countries, he points out, now have rules that make companies who suffer big losses of customer data to report these to the authorities. The inspiration for these measures comes from America.
Yet even Mr. Schaar admits that the Internet’s global scale means that there will need to be changes on both sides of the Atlantic. He hints that Europe might adopt a more flexible regulatory stance if America were to create what amounts to an independent data-protection body along European lines. In Europe, where the flagship Data Protection Directive came into effect in 1995,before firms such as Google and Facebook were even founded, the European Commission is conducting a review of its privacy policies. In America,Congress has begun debating a new privacy bill and the Federal Trade Commission is considering an overhaul of its rules. David Vladeck,the head of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, has acknowledged that "existing privacy frameworks have limitations".
Even if America and Europe do narrow their differences, Internet firms will still have to grapple with other data watchdogs. In Asia, countries that belong to APEC are trying to develop a set of regional guidelines for privacy rules under an initiative known as the Data Privacy Pathfinder. Some countries such as Australia and New Zealand have longstanding privacy laws,but many emerging nations have yet to roll out fully fledged versions of their own. Mr. Polonetsky sees Asia as "a new privacy battleground", with America and Europe both keen to tempt countries towards their own regulatory model. Shoehorning such firms into antiquated privacy frameworks will not benefit either them or their users.
It can be inferred from the passage that
选项
A、Americans pay less attention to their privacy than Europeans.
B、American firms should be more careful to collect data in Europe.
C、European regulators attempt to ban American firms of data collection.
D、European web giants welcome the regulations of European watchdogs.
答案
B
解析
推断题。第六段末句对首句做进一步解释:许多美国公司还不知道在欧洲开辟市场的同时高唱自我管理的优点,极可能像国内右翼政客指责反歧视法一样无效。即欧洲监管严格,在收集数据时需要格外注意遵守当地的监管法律,由此可以推出[B]为答案。第五段第二句这只是监管者的思路不同,并不能说明哪国人更注重隐私,排除[A];第七段末句指出“他们反而更加依赖于寻找出头鸟来替罪,希望能起到杀鸡儆猴的效用。”这里没有明确提及是拿美国公司开刀,明令禁止收集数据,[C]无依据;文章没有具体涉及欧洲互联网公司的反应和看法,排除[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Vi4O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Askedwhatjobtheywouldtakeiftheycouldhaveany,peopleunleashtheirimaginationsanddreamofexoticplaces,powerfulpo
BeliefWeallbelieveinsomethingorsomeone.Wemustbelieve,justaswemusteat,sleep,andreproduce.Mankindhasanins
InrecentyearsAmericansocietyhasbecomeincreasinglydependentonitsuniversitiestofindsolutionstoitsmajorproblems.
TheU.S.SpaceAgencyNASAsays______orbitingMirspacestationhaslostitsprimaryandbackupoxygensources.
______istheleaderoftheBritishgovernment.
TheDeathofaSpouseFormuchoftheworld,thedeathofRichardNixonwastheendofacomplexpubliclife.Butresearcher
Thesealaylikeanunbrokenmirrorallaroundthepine-girt,lonelyshoresofOrr’sIsland.Tall,kinglysprucesworetheirr
Argumentation:FunctionsandStrategiesI.Functionsofargumentation:Youcanuseargumentationto1)makeapointin(1)______
AtHarvardCollegeinSeptember,acontroversyeruptedovertheadoptionofa"freshmanpledge,"whichforthefirsttimeasked
A、BushmetIraqiPrimeMinisteronFridayB、BrzezinskiisamemberofRepublicanPartyC、Americanpeoplehavenomuchconfidence
随机试题
哲学物质范畴与自然科学的物质结构理论,两者是
颗粒黄体细胞和膜黄体细胞分泌
下列哪种行为,护士不需承担法律责任
某啤酒生产线扩建项目,位于原厂区西面100m的空地上,某国道从厂区北侧通过,距公路500m,距火车站26km,当地地形以山地高原为主,平原、绿洲、荒漠东西展开,南北更替,地势由西南向东北渐趋倾斜,当地地表水比较发达,地下水资源丰富。自然土壤由高山寒漠土、高
①因自然气候的变迁、无序的放垦、环境的污染和一些人为的因素,鄂尔多斯的生态环境遭受到严重破坏,这个曾经水草丰美、“风吹草地见牛羊”的富庶之地,其羊绒的品质近年来也在_________。②一年一度的端阳节,各地的民间习俗同多于异,如悬挂菖蒲艾草、佩
教师要遵循的学生身心发展的一般规律有()。
引起劳动法律关系产生的劳动法律事实是()。
A、1B、2C、3D、4C图形数阵,优先考虑对角线方向的数字联系。观察发现:第一个图中,6-5=5-4;第二个数阵中,4-6=5-7;第三个数阵中,8-7=4-3;则第四个数阵中应该满足:12-1=所求项-(-8),可知所求项为3。故正确答案为C。
6,7,8,13,15,21,( ),36
唐朝立法的开端是()
最新回复
(
0
)