首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Bullying(欺凌弱小者) at School: Tackling the Problem A. A broad definition of bullying is when a student is repeatedly exposed to
Bullying(欺凌弱小者) at School: Tackling the Problem A. A broad definition of bullying is when a student is repeatedly exposed to
admin
2010-06-11
56
问题
Bullying(欺凌弱小者) at School: Tackling the Problem
A. A broad definition of bullying is when a student is repeatedly exposed to negative actions of the part of one or more other students. These negative actions can take the form of physical contact, verbal abuse, or making faces and rude gestures. Spreading rumors and excluding the victim from a group are also common forms. Bullying also entails an imbalance in strength between the bullies and victim, what experts call an asymmetric power relationship.
B. Bullying among schoolchildren is certainly a very old phenomenon, though it was not until the early 1970s that it was made the object of systematic research. Though this research originally focused on Scandinavia, by the 1980s bullying among schoolchildren had attracted wider attention in countries such as Australia, Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States.
C. The surveys of more than 150,000 students show that some 15% of pupils in elementary and lower secondary/junior high schools, roughly corresponding to ages 7 to 16, in Scandinavia are involved in bully/victim problems with some regularity--either as bullies, victims or both. Approximately 9% are victims, and 7% bully other students with some regularity. A relatively small proportion (15%- 20%) of the victims are themselves bullies of other pupils. These figures probably underestimate the problem, and there are indications that the level of bullying has risen over the last 10--15 years. More worrying, it is the more frequent and severe forms of bullying that have increased most.
D. Scandinavia is clearly not the stable rock of peace and calm it is often portrayed to be. Still, bullying may be more prevalent in other countries. For example, one British study of over 6,700 students shows that more than a quarter (27%) of primary school students reported being bullied with some regularity; this figure was 10% for secondary school students. With regard to bullying other students, corresponding figures were 12% for primary and 6% for secondary school students.
E. These are the raw data, but what about the background? There is considerable research literature on the characteristics, family backgrounds, long-term outcomes for victims and bullies, mechanisms and group processes involved. Fundamentally, bullying has to be seen as a component of more generally antisocial and rule-breaking behavior. In other studies, some 35% to 40% of boys who were characterized as bullies in Grades 6 to 9 (ages 13 to 16) had been convicted of at least three officially registered crimes by the age of 24. In contrast, this was true of only 10% of boys who were not classified as bullies. In other words, former school bullies were four times more likely than other pupils to engage in relatively serious crime.
F. There are several common assumptions about the causes of school bullying for which there is no supporting evidence. They include claims that bullying is a consequence of large class or school sizes, or of the competition for grades and other pressures that school generates. Another common assumption is that under a tough surface bullies, in fact, suffer from poor self-esteem and insecurity. These views are no more accurate than the stereotype that students who are fat, red-haired and wear glasses are particularly likely to become victims of bullying.
G. In reality, other factors are more important. Certain personality characteristics and typical reaction patterns, combined with the level of physical strength or weakness in the case of boys, can help to explain the development of bullying problems in individual students. At the same time, environmental influences, such as teachers’ attitudes, behavior and supervisory routines play a crucial role in determining the extent to which these problems will manifest themselves in a classroom or a school.
H. Victims of bullying form a large group of students who tend to be neglected by their schools. Yet it is a fundamental human or democratic right for a child to feel sage in school and to be spared the oppression and repeated, intentional humiliation of bullying. Governments and school authorities have therefore an important role to play in assuring that these rights are honored.
I. A Swedish law passed in 1994 and modified in 1997 goes some way to upholding these children’s rights at school. The associated regulations also make school principals responsible for realizing these goals, including the development of an explicit intervention plan against bullying. Similar legal moves, although with somewhat weaker formulations, have been made in a few other countries, notably Norway and the United Kingdom.
J. As bully/victim problems have gradually been placed on formal school agendas in many countries, a number of suggestions about their handing and prevention have been proposed. Some of these suggestions and approaches seem ill-conceived or even counterproductive, such as excessive focus on changing the victims’ behavior to make them less vulnerable to bullying. Others appear meaningful and potentially useful. A key problem, however, is that most of them have either not had positive results or have not been subjected to proper evaluation. Therefore it is difficult to know which measures actually work and which do not. Yet it is the results that count, not how adults might ,feel about using a programme.
K. The situation is well illustrated by the following. Recently, a US expert committee under the leadership of a respected criminologist, Professor Delbert Elliott, systematically evaluated more than 400 violence (or problem-behavior) prevention programmes. Only 10 of the programmes (four of which were school-based) satisfied the specified minimum criteria of the evaluation. These criteria were that they could show documented successful results, that the positive effects had lasted at least a year and that the programme had produced positive results in at least one site beyond the original one. These "Blueprint" or model programmes are now being implemented in a number of sites with financial support from the US Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
L. Bullying Prevention Programme, founded by Dan Olweus of the University of Bergen, is one of the 10 US Blueprint programmes and was the programme selected by the Norwegian committee. In this programme, the tools are quite straightforward, ranging from adult awareness and parent meetings to classroom roles against bullying, followed up by regular classroom meetings with the students.
M. The first evaluation of the use of the intervention programme was based on data from approximately 2,500 students (aged 11--14) in 42 primary and lower secondary/junior high schools in Bergen, Norway. The subjects of the study were followed over a period of two and a half years, from 1983 to 1985. The main findings were threefold. First, there were marked reductions--by 50% or more--in bully/victim problems for the periods studied, which included 8 and 20 months of intervention. Second, clear reductions were recorded in general antisocfal behavior, such as destruction, fighting, pilfering, drunkenness and truancy. And third, the social climate of the classroom was greatly improved, while student satisfaction with school life rose too.
N. The Norwegian government has now decided to offer the Bullying Prevention Programme to all comprehensive schools in Norway. A key element of the new proposal is the establishment of educational teacher discussion groups at each school. These groups will receive training and supervision from special trainer candidates, who in turn are trained and supervised by the Group for the Prevention of Bullying and Antisocial Behavior at the University of Bergen. In this way, it will be possible to reach out to a larger number of schools in a relatively short time.
antisocial behavior.
选项
答案
train and supervise
解析
参见N段“These groups will receive training and supervision from special trainer candidates.., are trained and supervised by the Group for the Prevention of Bullying.”
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VwKK777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Bearesearcherinthearea.B、Beaclinicalpsychologist.C、Knowhowtobeaproblem-solver.D、Knowmoreaboutpeople’sbehav
A、Theemployerandemployee.B、Theinterviewerandinterviewee.C、Theteacherandstudent.D、Thepoliceofficeranddriver.DWha
What’stheopinionofeconomistsaboutgoingtocollege?Whatisthechiefconsiderationwhenstudentschooseacollegetoday?
A、Followteachers.B、Freshmentofauniversity.C、Second-yearstudents.D、Eitherseniorsorjuniors.B
A、Earningafullscholarshiptolawschool.B、Gettingotherpeopletoacknowledgehissuccess.C、Achievingwhathecaresaboutm
A、Nottovisithisclass.B、Theclassobjectstohervisit.C、TovisithisclassnextMonday.D、Thestudentswillhavetheirexa
A、Acceptthejobofferfromthebookstore.B、Acceptthejobofferfrom1BM.C、IntheholidayworkinIBMandinthenextschool
随机试题
女性,74岁。自觉因擦背着凉后两肩和后背阵阵酸痛,每阵10分钟左右,不发烧,仍可下床走动。于今晨1时许,突然出现心前区剧痛,并向双肩、后背和左臂放射,伴大汗,休息后不见缓解,早8点急诊住院。检查:年迈,半卧位,无明显青紫,颈静脉不怒张,肺(-),心略向左侧
引起慢性肺心病失代偿最常见的诱因是
关于民事法律关系,下列哪一选项是正确的?()
由于分部分项工程量清单漏项或其他非承包人原因的工程变更,造成工程量清单出现新增项,对于新增项的综合单价的确定方法,下列各项中错误的是()。
在会计电算化环境下,不属于审核记账员的责任的是()。
持票人行使追索权,可以请求被追索人支付的金额和费用有()。
关于亚洲政坛女性首脑,下列说法错误的是()。
秦汉四百年间,政治与文化相互推动,形成互补机制,其效应:统一被认为是合理的、正常的,分裂则被认为是违理的、反常的。秦汉文化造成的这一定势,深刻地影响了此后两千年的中国历史。国家统一,使多元文化整合的速度与力度加强;而整合后的一统文化,具有强大的凝聚力和向心
A公司是搞电器的,A公司目前B:S是2:1,资产贝塔1.2,债务贝塔0.3。新项目初试投资100亿,第一年期末净收益税后现金流5亿,以后年增长3%。现在A公司以这个领域的B公司作为参考。B公司目前股票价格20,数量5亿。债券100亿,债券票面利率4.5%,
已知函数z=z(x,y)满足
最新回复
(
0
)