首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness of the inadequacies of the judicial system in the United States. Costs a
In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness of the inadequacies of the judicial system in the United States. Costs a
admin
2014-01-13
29
问题
In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness of the inadequacies of the judicial system in the United States. Costs are staggering both for the taxpayers and the litigants — and the litigants, or parties, have to wait sometimes many years before having their day in court. Many suggestions have been made concerning methods of ameliorating(改善)the situation, but as in most branches of government, changes come slowly.
One suggestion that has been made in order to maximize the efficiency of the system is to allow districts that have an overabundance of pending cases to borrow judges from other districts that do not have such a backlog. Another suggestion is to use pretrial conferences, in which the judge meets in his chambers with the litigants and their attorneys in order to narrow the issues, limit the witnesses, and provide for a more orderly trial. The theory behind pretrial conferences is that judges will spend less time on each case and parties will more readily settle before trial when they realize the adequacy of their claims and their opponents’ evidence. Unfortunately, at least one study has shown that pretrial conferences actually use more judicial time than they save, rarely result in pretrial settlements, and actually result in higher damage settlements.
Many states have now established another method, small-claims courts, in which cases over small sums of money can be disposed of with considerable dispatch. Such proceedings cost the litigants almost nothing. In California, for example, the parties must appear before the judge without the assistance of counsel. The proceedings are quite informal and there is no pleading(辩护)— the litigants need to make only a one-sentence statement of their claim. By going to this type of court, the plaintiff(原告)waives(放弃)any right to a jury trial and the right to appeal the decision.
The word "litigants" means most nearly______.
选项
A、jury members
B、commentators
C、parties in a lawsuit
D、taxpayers
答案
C
解析
语义题。原文多处提到litigants一词。根据此词前后的内容attorneys,make only a one-sentencestatement判定文中的litigants意为“诉讼”。选项中,jury members“陪审团成员”;commentators“评论员”;parties in a lawsuit“诉讼部分”;taxpayers“纳税人”。故答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/W1QO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Itdidn’thappenovernightTheproblemofpollutedairhasbeenfesteringforcenturies.Suddenlytheproblemofairpolluti
ToliveintheUnitedStatestodayistogainanappreciationforDahrendorf’sassertionthatsocialchangeexistseverywhere.
Guthrie’scontiguityprincipleofferspracticalsuggestionsforhowtobreakhabits.Oneapplicationofthethresholdmethod
Duringourlivesallofusareexposedtothepossibilityofavarietyofriskeventssuchas:workaccidents,majorillness,de
Friendsplayanimportantpartinourlives,andalthoughwemaytake【46】forgranted,weoftendon’tclearlyunderstandhowwem
Eversincethisgovernment’stermbegan,theattitudetoteachershasbeenovershadowedbythemantrathatgoodteacherscannot
In1798thepoliticaleconomistMalthuspredictedthatintimemankindwouldfacestarvation,havingoutgrowntheavailablefood
Thepresidenthassaidthattherearenoplansto______taxes.
Therearesigns______restaurantsarebecomingmorepopularwithfamilies.(中南大学2006年试题)
The______totheadvertisementsheplacedinthenewspaperswasverygood;overahundredlettersofapplicationwerereceived.
随机试题
下列选项中,不能计入产品成本的是()
党的十六大第一次对社会主义本质进行了完整的表述。
锥体束包括___________和___________束,前者经内囊___________,联系的下运动神经元是___________,后者经内囊___________,联系的下运动神经元是___________。
男性,30岁。因右下颌智齿冠周炎,造成颌间隙、颞下间隙、翼下颊间隙脓肿。切开引流的最佳方法为
下列关于宪法的分类说法正确的是()。
“备案号”栏应填:“标记唛码及备注”栏除了填报标记唛码外,还应填报:
在我国,备付金是指()。
2014年8月12日,某县地税局以违法开具发票为由,向该县纳税人金滨娱乐有限公司送达罚款5000元的《税务行政处罚决定书》。该公司不服,于8月22日向市地税局申请行政复议。9月28日,经市地税局行政复议机构同意,该公司撤回复议申请。根据规定,下列关于该公司
双人拦网“心跟进”防守战术中,一般是()号位跟进。
《宪法》第1条第1款规定:“中华人民共和国是工人阶级领导的、以工农联盟为基础的人民民主专政的社会主义国家。”这说明我国的国体是()。
最新回复
(
0
)