首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The corporate world is increasingly rejecting imperial chief executives in favour of anonymous managers—prudent and boring men a
The corporate world is increasingly rejecting imperial chief executives in favour of anonymous managers—prudent and boring men a
admin
2021-02-21
63
问题
The corporate world is increasingly rejecting imperial chief executives in favour of anonymous managers—prudent and boring men and women who can hardly get themselves noticed at cocktail parties, let alone stop the traffic in Moscow. Some of the world’s most powerful bosses are striking mainly for their mildness: Sam Palmisano at IBM, Tony Hayward at BP, Terry Leahy at Tesco, Vittorio Colao at Vodafone. These men are at the head of a vast army of even more forgettable bosses.
It is true that there are a few more women and members of ethnic minorities at the top of companies than there used to be. But physical diversity has not translated into cultural diversity or intellectual vitality. Almost without exception, today’s bosses speak lengthily of the same tired old management ideas—about the merits of doing well by doing right, the importance of valuing your workers, the virtues of sustainability and so forth.
The women who were profiled in a recent article in the Financial Times about the "top 50 women in world business" were every bit as proficient with the old management ideas as their male colleagues. Indra Nooyi, the boss of PepsiCo, proclaimed that she spends her weekends "doing everything that normal people do". Andrea Jung, the boss of Avon, said her biggest inspiration came from "Avon’s six million sales representatives worldwide".
The fashion for faceless chief executives is part of an understandable reaction against yesterday’s imperial bosses, many of whom were vivid characters but who collectively brought severe criticism and disgrace on the system that let them shine. Some, such as Jeff Stalling of Enron, broke the law and helped inspire a dramatic tightening of government regulation. Others, such as Home Depot’s Bob Nardelli, paid themselves like superstars but delivered miserable results.
The turbulent business climate is another factor that encourages today’s chief executives to keep their heads down. Their average tenure has declined from ten years in the 1970s to six years today, and boards are becoming ever more likely to fire bosses if they get out of line, particularly in Europe. The financial crisis has also produced a wave of popular fury about over-paid executives and their unaccountable ways. In this sort of climate it is not just the paranoid, but the faceless, who survive.
Facelessness—or at least humility—is also the height of fashion among management consultants. Corporate headhunters are helping firms find "humble" bosses. Jim Collins, one of America’s most popular professional experts, argues that the best chief executives are not showy visionaries but "humble, self-effacing, diligent and resolute souls". Business journalists have taken to producing glowing profiles of self-effacing and self-denying bosses such as Mike Eskew, the former boss of UPS, who flew coach and shared an administrative assistant with three other people.
Yet there is surely a danger of taking all this too far. A low profile is no guarantee against corporate failure. In general, the corporate world needs its showy visionaries and raging self-centered bosses rather more than its humble leaders and corporate civil servants. Think of the people who have shaped the modern business landscape, and "faceless" and "humble" are not the first words that come to mind.
[A] was fired by the board due to poor performance in Home Depot
[B] dishonored the system that earned him fame and glories by violating the law.
[C] may agree that being humble is one of the requirements for the best CEOs.
[D] was criticized for being over-paid for his poor performance in Home Depot.
[E] applies old management philosophies like valuing employees.
[F] was one of the low-profile bosses reported in business field.
[G] is a good example of the best chief executives described in the Financial Times.
Mike Eskew
选项
答案
F
解析
Mike Eskew出现在第六段。该段最后一句说,商业记者开始报道不爱出风头、谦虚克制的老板们的光辉形象,例如UPS的前老总Mike Eskew。F中的low-profile是对原文glowing profiles of self-effacing and self-denying的概括,reported对应原文的journalists,故F为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/W1Y4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
Withtheriseofthewomen’smovementinthelate1960s,thepoliticalsignificanceofdressbecameincreasinglyexplicit.Rejec
Priortothe20thcentury,manylanguageswithsmallnumbersofspeakerssurvivedforcenturies.Theincreasinglyinterconnected
Newscientificstudiesrevealthehiddencostsofmultitaskingastechnologyincreasinglytemptspeopletodomorethanonethin
Superiorcustomerservicecanbeanessentialsourceofstrengthascompaniesemergefromtherecession,butmanagersneedtoun
Superiorcustomerservicecanbeanessentialsourceofstrengthascompaniesemergefromtherecession,butmanagersneedtoun
Superiorcustomerservicecanbeanessentialsourceofstrengthascompaniesemergefromtherecession,butmanagersneedtoun
LOSANGELES—Allyear,Hollywoodexecutiveshavebeenbrushingasideworriesaboutbox-officestagnationintheUnitedStatesand
LOSANGELES—Allyear,Hollywoodexecutiveshavebeenbrushingasideworriesaboutbox-officestagnationintheUnitedStatesand
随机试题
口对口人工呼吸的操作错误的是()。
对不可替代行为及不作为义务的执行,可采取以下哪些直接执行措施?()
图示一高压喷水入大气的喷嘴,喷嘴出口断面1—1的平均流速υ1为30m/s,喷至2—2断面的平均流速υ2减少为1m/s,不计水头损失,则喷射高度H为:
某地矩形基础埋深为1.5m,底面尺寸为2m×3m,柱作用于基础的轴心荷载F=900kN,弯矩M=310kN.m,(沿基础长边方向作用)基础和基础台阶上土的平均重度γ=20kN/m3,试问基础底面边缘最大的地基反力接近于下列哪个值?()
根据《风景名胜区规划规范》,下列选项中不正确的是()。
某工程施工单位按招标文件中提供的工程量清单作出报价(见表4一1)。施工合同约定:工程预付款为合同总价的20%,从工程进度款累计总额达到合同总价10%的月价开始,按当月工程进度款的30%扣回,扣完为止;施工过程中发生的设计变更,采用以直接费为计算基础的全费用
实际操作过程中,关联交易实际上是一种内幕交易,与市场竞争、公开竞价的方式不同,其价格可由关联双方协商,容易成为企业调节利润、避税和为一些部门及个人获利的途径,有利于保护中小投资。()
()是指货物在船到港前进入承运人指定仓库后,承运人应托运人的要求而签发的提单。
一项研究报告显示,在与孩子的相处中,爸爸的收获比妈妈要多。男性在扮演爸爸的角色时,会比单身男士有更多的幸福感和积极向上的情绪,研究提到,相反,女性却没有因为做妈妈而更幸福。有人认为这是因为妈妈们常常家务缠身的缘故。以下哪项如果为真,最能支持上述观点?(
条件"not工资额>2000"的含义是
最新回复
(
0
)